TEST FOR COLON CANCER2 Introduction Standard Molecular Biomarker is a test that is carried out in the histopathology laboratory during the process of diagnosing for colon cancer. The standard molecular biomarker is useful in determining the treatment of colon cancer. It gives guidelines for conventional chemotherapy methods and identifies the effective therapies for the treatment of colon cancer (Sepulveda et al, 2017). Principles of Standard Molecular Biomarker The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Due to the increased understanding of the colon cancer pathways, it has resulted to the increaseof monoclonal antibodies to the EGFR, panitumumab so that to block EGFR, thus preventing the activation of the transduction pathway signalsthat uses p13-AKT, SRC and RAS enzymaticreactionswith ligandslikeEGFR Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). It causes several somatic mutations to produce neo- antigens. The dMMR tumors can respond to the blockage of immune checkpoints such as PD1, PD-LI, LAG-3, and IDO because of the presence of neo-antigens. (Morelli et al, 2015). BRAF.Oncogene that is present in the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway which has adversative prognosis in all the treatments. PIK3CA. It is a proto-oncogene which encodes for the PI3K involved in the EGFR tyrosine domain. In recent studies have shown that the mutations of the exon 20 of this proto- oncogene can act as a target for anti- EGFR therapy resistance. This domain leads to activation of AKT- mTOR pathway after phosphorylation of AKT.
TEST FOR COLON CANCER3 PTEN. It is a tumor – suppressor gene which encodes a protein used in suppressing the PI3- AKT signal path. It lacks consensus and acts as a predictive marker of anti-EGFR treatment (Punt, Koopman & Vermeulen, 2017) . How Molecular Biomarkers are used in Colon Cancer Treatment The molecular markers predict responses to a particular treatment or therapy that is called the predictive biomarkers. Treatment of monoclonal antibody marks the epidermal growth factor receptor and bind EGFR extracellular zone, thus, leading to the blockage of the signal pathways of EGFR. For colon cancer (colorectal cancer,) patients, Anti- EGFR has been the main target used for colorectal cancer (CRC) therapies. CRC therapies require the knowledge of genes mutationalwithinthepathwaysasthepredictivebiomarkersofresponsestowardsCRC treatments. The CRC patients who have the KRAS triggering mutations which affect exon 2codons 12 and 13 were demonstrated through clinical trials but did not show any effects from anti- EGFR monoclonal antibody treatments. Other guidelines demonstrating the molecular bio- testing of EGFR signaling pathways in gene mutations that can affect the CRC responses towards anti- EGFR antibody treatments involves exons of NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA andPTEN The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status of colorectal cancer might show predictive values in specific clinical environments. When testing for the CRC patients, MMR is recommendable in all patients so that to perform a workup testing for the evaluation of any possible Lynch syndrome. For the patients with immunotherapy, the molecular biomarker demonstrated that it is
TEST FOR COLON CANCER4 crucial to use microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, which is a marker of deficient MMR (Topalian, Taube, Anders & Pardoll, 2016). . During CRC development and progression, there are alterations of several clinical genes that include BRAF and dMMR, which have been measured using several metrics of tumor survival or progress and shown to affect the colon cancer prognosis. The stress on accuracy genomic-based drugs and post-genomic period provides and a large quantity of new information and promising data of the new molecular cancer biomarkers, which might become a successful molecular diagnostic tool. The tool would be efficiently useful in enabling effective treatments of patients with colon cancer (Bronte et al, 2015). Many of the histopathological laboratories have been known to delay the treatments of cancer patients where the molecular biomarkers involve several timely stages. These stages include; selection of assays, selection of the specimen to be tested, tests ordering, and the turnaround time while waiting for the results. In recent days, the plethora in the technical approach is effectively used if the test sensitivity and specificity meets the clinical requirements. The current method uses several molecular markers in gene panels like next-generation sequencing (NGS) cancer panels that can assay hundreds of amplicons and genes and with known mutational status in CRC (Kocarnik, Shiovitz & Phipps, 2015). Conclusion It is clearly shown that there several biomarkers and specific exons with accurate prognostic value in the treatment of colon cancer. The CRC guidelines for selecting test for cancer require well–established methods for determining and regular developmental updates in
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
TEST FOR COLON CANCER5 the management of clinical molecular testing. The molecular biomarker test that involves EGFR signal pathways provides efficient and effective clinical actionable as negative predictors of importance to the anti- EGFR monoclonal antibody in the treatments of colorectal cancer.
TEST FOR COLON CANCER6 Reference Bronte, G., Silvestris, N., Castiglia, M., Galvano, A., Passiglia, F., Sortino, G., ... & Fanale, D. (2015). New findings on primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: do all roads lead to RAS?. Oncotarget, 6(28), 24780. Kocarnik, J. M., Shiovitz, S., & Phipps, A. I. (2015). Molecular phenotypes of colorectal cancer and potential clinical applications. Gastroenterology report, 3(4), 269-276. Morelli, M. P., Overman, M. J., Dasari, A., Kazmi, S. M. A., Mazard, T., Vilar, E., ... & Morris, J. (2015). Characterizing the patterns of clonal selection in circulating tumor DNA from patients with colorectal cancer refractory to anti-EGFR treatment. Annals of Oncology, 26(4), 731-736. Punt, C. J., Koopman, M., & Vermeulen, L. (2017). From tumour heterogeneity to advances in precision treatment of colorectal cancer. Nature reviews Clinical oncology, 14(4), 235. Sepulveda, A. R., Hamilton, S. R., Allegra, C. J., Grody, W., Cushman-Vokoun, A. M., Funkhouser, W. K., ... & Monzon, F. A. (2017). Molecular biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer: guideline from the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. American journal of clinical pathology, 147(3), 221-260. Topalian, S. L., Taube, J. M., Anders, R. A., & Pardoll, D. M. (2016). Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer, 16(5), 275.