Ask a question from expert

Ask now

[Type the abstract of the document here.] [Type the abstract of the document

4 Pages837 Words403 Views
   

Added on  2021-11-17

About This Document

The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] Testimony is an important term used as evidence by the court in any trial. The opinion or statement given by both are differ in the way of their fairness and reasonableness as an expert can provide more relevant and appropriate opinion as compared to a lay witness. At some places of testimony the opinions of

[Type the abstract of the document here.] [Type the abstract of the document

   Added on 2021-11-17

BookmarkShareRelated Documents
TESTIMONY
Legislation and
Testimony Testimony

[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of
the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of
the contents of the document.]
[Type the abstract of the document here.] [Type the abstract of the document_1
1. Testimony is an important term used as evidence by the court in any trial. There can be
different kinds of testimony it can be either normal testimony or special testimony made
by an expert. The opinion or statement given by both are differ in the way of their
fairness and reasonableness as an expert can provide more relevant and appropriate
opinion as compared to a lay witness. If the matter pertains to any technical or scientific
issue than the opinions of an expert witness shall be considered as more valuable. At
some places of testimony the opinions of experts would significantly permitted instead of
the statement of any lay witness (Brodsky, & Gutheil, 2016).
2. In case where the suggestions of an expert are required then it is irrelevant to consider the
opinion of lay witness. The expert has qualification in an individual sector through which
he can prove the relevance of facts properly. Whereas a lay witness only shares or
provide the facts of his own knowledge. He does not have any special knowledge of such
field. Although he can provide or lighten the facts before Court but he does not have
relevant qualifications to prove such facts in front of court. Generally the expert witness
is assigned to provide their opinions in case of technical. Scientific or in cases related to
intellectual properties (Faigman, Monahan, & Slobogin, 2014).
1. When we consider the testimony of any lay witness then we have to consider various
factors regarding him i.e. age, demeanor etc. This is required because the statement of a
minor or an unsound mind person has less effect as compared to a sound mind person.
We cannot consider the statement of a criminal for deciding the matter of another
criminal. Also we cannot rely on the statement given by an eye witness who escaped
from the place where the cause of action occurred. The behavior and past criminal
records of a witness are also important to consider while taking his opinion. It is
necessary to know the accuracy of such statements (Brodsky, & Gutheil, 2016).
2. The opinions of an expert are used in the cases related to severity of injury, cause of
failure of any machinery or other devices, intellectual property. In these cases the Court
can call the experts to evaluate the facts of case. These experts should have the complete
knowledge in the field of his working. Doctor, Engineer, scientist, hand writing expert
[Type the abstract of the document here.] [Type the abstract of the document_2

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Court Jurisdiction System-Assignment 9
|9
|2061
|28