Tests and Measurements for Assessing Personality and Scales Used in Social Science Study

Running head: TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS
1
Tests and measurements
Name:
Institution:

TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS 2
Introduction
Reliably and validly assessing people's personality is essential to a mental evaluation.
Therefore, considerable energy has been put into building self-report action. Researcher typically
seeks to capitalize on the content rationality of the tests and each item’s content is thoroughly
selected to apprehend the construct. But, an influence of item syntax, grammar, and wording are
underestimated or neglected (Allemand et al., 2008, pp.758). Not only the content but also the
answering scales (formats) are crucial and affect psychometric aspects of a scale such as a
criterion and construct intensity.
Some basic guideline exists that ought to be tracked to safeguard that items are correctly
built. It is crucial to keep all the item constructs in details, and being confident not to combine
things that evaluate constructs with that assessing outcomes or reactions (Ziegler & Hagemann,
2015, pp. 43). Another essential aspect is that statement should be modest and as short as
possible, and the linguistic used should be familiar to the target respondents (Kline, 2005, pp.
30). Reverse-scored or negatively-phrased should be used with care as a few of these items
scattered can have a detrimental result on the psychometric features. For the meaningful
responses to be obtained, questions should be comprehended by the respondent as intended by
the researchers (Kline, 2005, pp. 49). Finally, content redundancies are necessary when building
numerous items because they are the basis of inner consistency.
Content adequacy assessment is also critical to the item construction. In many instances,
a researcher invests a lot of resource and time only to discover that they have flawed necessary
measure. Ensuring the content are sufficient before final questionnaire development offers aid
for construct validity and permits the removal of items that may be theoretically unreliable

TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS 3
(Ziegler & Hagemann, 2015, pp. 45). Similarly, researcher should take care of the factor analysis
as it assists in determining how many aspects exist for the set of items. Internal consistency
assessment is also a significant element in item constructs. But, the most recommended for
measuring the scales internal consistency is Cronbach Alpha which illustrates how the item
gauges the same construct. Construct validation and replication is also significant concerns in
the constructing the question (Bayoglu et al., 2013, pp. 331). For researchers to circumvent the
typical source concerns, it is commended that facts from sources other than the respondents, such
as regular appraisals, be composed where possible. The duplication includes factors analysis,
evaluation of internal reliability and constructs authentication. Therefore, the above reviews
should offer the scholar with the sureness that the completed measures hold the validity and
reliability and would be appropriate for use in an upcoming study.
Type of scales
A scale is a form of a merged gauge that is comprised of numerous objects that have
empirical or logical assembly (Ashton & Lee, 2007, pp.107). Therefore, the scales make use of
variances among the pointers of the variables. For instance: when a query has the reaction
selection such as at all times, occasionally, hardly and never. It signifies a scale because the
response selections have differences in intensity and are rank-ordered. Numerous types of range
exist, but in this paper, it will analyze four regularly used scales in social science study and how
they are created (Fishman & Galguera, 2003, pp. 61).
Likert scale
The scale is regularly used in social science survey. The level is termed after the
psychologist Rensis Likert (Dittrich et al., 2007, pp. 4). Being one of the commonly used scales,

TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS 4
it illustrates how a candidate provides their view on something by affirming the level to which
they approve or differ. "The scale looks similar such as, intensely agree, and agree, neither
agree nor disagree, disagree, sturdily disagree” (Dittrich et al., 2007, pp. 5).
For researchers to build the size, each answer selection is allocated a range starting from
0 to 4 (Dittrich et al., 2007, pp. 6). Likert items can be supplemented collectively for each to get
a complete score. For instance: measurement of prejudice against women (Kline, 2005, pp. 64).
The score of every statement would be summed for each candidate to build a complete count of
bias. If we had five comments and candidates hugely disagreed to each item, her or his compete
prejudice score would be 0, denoting a slight degree of bias against women (Dittrich et al., 2007,
pp. 9).
Bogardus social distance scale
The Bogardus scale is a method for gauging the readiness of individuals to take part in
social links with others. Entirely, the range requests individuals to confirm the extent to which
they are tolerating another group. “Each item on the level is counted to reveal the social space,
from 1.00 as a measure of number social distance to 5.00 measuring the maximum social
distance”(Bayoglu et al., 2013, pp. 337). When the answer of each reaction is averaged, a higher
magnitude denotes a lower level of approval.
A semantic differential scale
The differential gauge is a collaboration of more than one range. The maximum disparity
scale is used in trade-off analyses (Revelle et al., 2011, pp. 3). Max diff study is utilized in new
products aspect or even in market division study to get proper arrangements of the most vital
prediction feature. The scale asks the candidates to answer the questionnaires and selects