Case laws

Running Head: Case laws 1
Case laws
Student Name
Student ID
Institution Name
Author Note

Case Law 2
Introduction
The case law is about the two parties Brandon and Hoof Hearted Adventures and the case to
applied is of the” tort of negligence”. In this case, a brief evaluation of the clauses, issues or
concerns and access would be discussed related to the case.
Answer 1
The parties involved are Brandon and Hoof Hearted Adventures. The legal principles applied
here is the negligence law and the tort law.
Answer 2
Brandon essential elements of the negligence action which plaintiff can win over a lawsuit
are the injuries, damages, losses caused by the defendant negligence. In the contract, the Hoof
Hearted adventures has clearly mentioned the liability clause, which the plaintiff without
even reading has signed (Svantesson, 2015). It is important when the parties are signing such
clauses they need to read contract clauses. Each party should allow parties to have a
reasonable time to go through the contract. They need to abide by the clauses of the
negligence that should oblige to pay for damages. Also, it was clearly written in the contract
that when the rider is riding the horse, the employee needs to check if the rider is wearing a
saddle, harness along with the riding equipment. But when Brandon was sitting, no employee
was there to assist him. Brandon also without notifying started with the horse riding.
Additionally, before allowing the rider to do independent horse riding, the employee also
needs to train the horse and the rider about the avoidable accidents. Here, the employee of the
Hoof Hearted Adventures completely avoided it. There was also no additional employee of
the security guard to assist the rider.