CRJ 222 Term Paper: Private Prisons and Profitability Debate

This essay examines the debate over whether private, for-profit corporations should be allowed to run U.S. prisons. The paper begins with an introduction to the topic and its significance, followed by a roadmap of the arguments. It presents opposing arguments, including the increasing number of detained immigrants and the blurring of the reasons for using for-profit corporations. The author then presents their own argument, discussing the weakest, moderate, and strongest points in favor of private prisons, such as their role in reducing the burden on the government and providing job opportunities. The conclusion summarizes the key points, highlighting the growth of private prisons and their impact on the U.S. immigration detention system. The essay incorporates multiple scholarly sources and aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the issue. The paper is a persuasive research essay for CRJ 222, focusing on effective criminal justice communication principles and APA formatting.

UNIVERSITY NAME
STUDENT NAME
DATE
PRIVATE PRISONS: SHOULD PRIVATE PRISON “FOR PROFIT”
CORPORATIONS BE ALLOWED TO RUN U.S. PRISON?

TABLE OF CONTENTS
• I. Introduction
• I A. The significance of the topic
• I B. Roadmap of the paper
• II. Opposing Arguments
• II A. Overview of Claims and Evidence
• II B. Critique of argument
• III. Your Argument
• III A. Weakest Point
• III B. Moderate Point
• III C. Strongest Point
• Conclusion
• References

I. INTRODUCTION
• This study will be based on the Private Prisons
that private prison should be allowed to run U.S.
prison in terms of “for profit” corporations. Here
all the pros and cons will be argued with the help
of evidence to support or negate the problems.

I A. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
TOPIC
• This research study helps to know to consider the
advantages and disadvantages of private prisons
in the United States and how it benefits the
government as well as to the for-profit prison
corporation

I B. THESIS STATEMENT
• Here research study will focus on the detained
immigrants who are prisoned in private prisons
and the reasons why the government promote
for-profit organizations for detained immigrants.

I C. ROADMAP OF THE PAPER
• The core idea of the paper to either propose or
oppose Private Prisons that private prison should
be allowed to run U.S. prison in terms of “for
profit” corporations based on evidence and facts.

II. OPPOSING ARGUMENTS
II A. OVERVIEW OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
• Throughout 2016 fiscal year, around 353,000
refugees recognized for custody or exclusion by
United States Immigration and Customs
Enforcement approved concluded supplementary
two hundred migration imprisonment
accommodations, since 2001 from 209,000.
• The major reserved custodial servicers gain ample
yearly incomes from impeding migrants,
comprising those recognized for asylum seekers,
removal, as well as others in anticipation of an
inquiry in migration court of law, in addition to
persons in the procedure of actuality expelled
(Burkhardt, 2017).

II B. CRITIQUE OF ARGUMENT
• The increasing number of illegal immigrants or verdict
immigrants as of August 2016 compelled United States
Immigration and Customs Enforcement to contract bed space in
native prisons in addition to state-owned penitentiaries. The
actual reason for the use of for-profit corporations (private
prisons) has been blurred and aims to provide convenient
facilities to detained immigrants and reduce the overall burden of
the federal government not achieved.
• In both circumstances, the worry is understandable: the wariness
provisions that force lead performers in the organization to
wandering from their responsibility to direct reasonableness
objectively (Claus, 2016).

III. YOUR ARGUMENT
III A. WEAKEST POINT
• The point is here that private prisons have
reduced the overall burden of the federal and
state government where it is become apparently
unbearable to run private prisons (Hulley, Liebling
& Crewe, 2011). In centralized in addition to
state-run reformatories that are openly
functioned, the amount of convicts being
contained is rapidly more numerous than the
cribs in addition to populace stages the ability
was intended to embrace.

III B. MODERATE POINT
• The denationalization of penitentiaries makes
occupation breaks on plentiful planes for a public.
There are the unswerving occupations that are
obtainable in the penitentiary. Facility business
occupations are essential to care that populace.
Conveyance specialists must bring in expendable
properties.

III C. STRONGEST POINT
• Indeed, even with a criminal equity degree,
looking for some kind of employment in law
authorization can be a troublesome
recommendation. Numerous organizations need
experienced staff that can start working right
away. Revenue driven offices offer a section level
position for prison guards where that experience
can be acquired. It is a chance to adopt new
aptitudes, apply the information from a criminal
equity degree out of the depressed, and get
settled.

IV. CONCLUSION
• It is evident that in the United States, A rushing
prisoner populace in the 1980s directed to thriving
in for-profit reformatories. Nowadays, in private
course prisons have converted the administration’s
defaulting imprisonment centers for undocumented
refugees.
• The preceding few periods has observed the
increasing engrossment as well as the impact of the
private prison trade in the United States colonization
execution, in conjunction with the enlargement of
the migration imprisonment arrangement.