Historical Analysis: Colonisation and Removal of Indigenous Children

This essay traces the history of European colonisation in Australia and the compulsory removal of Indigenous children, highlighting the distrust many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have towards white institutions. It discusses the Protectionist legislation used to justify the removal of Indigenous children under the guise of child welfare, examining government investigations and policies. The colonisation process led to poor health conditions and homelessness among Indigenous children. Social work's role in unjust practices is explored, emphasizing the lack of value placed on traditional Indigenous systems by British colonisers. The essay also discusses the impact of these policies on Indigenous families, the separation of siblings, and the long-term effects on education and employment. It concludes by highlighting the need for social justice and acknowledging the historical injustices faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Essay
1

Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................3
Main body:.................................................................................................................................4
Conclusion:................................................................................................................................9
References:...............................................................................................................................10
2

Introduction:
The report will be tracing the history of the compulsory eliminating of the Indigenous
children’s and the history of the European Colonisation of Australia. Many of the Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander individuals are wary of the white institutions and social welfare.
The discussion will be carried out on a policy of Protectionist legislation which was basically
utilised for the penchant to the general child welfare legislation to eliminate Indigenous
Children, in this the officials of the government certainly acted towards the individuals. The
report will also be carrying out explanation of the investigations that were carried out by the
government and the officials for the indigenous kids. The process of colonisation resulted in
poor conditions of health and sickness for the children’s that were homeless.
3

Main body:
Social work has been associated with and has plotted in supremacist, disparaging, and
unjustifiable practices. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people groups were, all in all,
given a role as those in outrageous need of social administrations, training, lodging, and other
security administrations and in this manner have been, and are, the beneficiaries of social
work's training of not dynamic members in its development. The welfare and social
approaches forced upon the Indigenous Australians by the British trespassers did not at all
esteem these customary systems. The absence of comprehension and acknowledgement with
respect to non-Indigenous governments and organizations may go some approach to
clarifying and understanding the proceeding with poor outcomes from forced non-Indigenous
projects (Green, et. al, 2018).
The degree to which Aboriginal guardians who consented to their kids going to auxiliary
school in far-off areas remained in certainty succumbing to coercion is an annoying issue.
The Investigation has caught that in territories where there is no optional training offices
were accessible, for instance on Cape Barren Island in Tasmania, Central Australia and in
the Torres Strait, the groups of promising understudies that were inquired as to whether they
needed their youngsters to be given the occasion of encouraging the training by certainly
taking off their home and going to live somewhere else. Entries for Investigation underscored
that by making those offers it would have not ever the anticipation to dislodge of the bonds
within the family or to just deny about the groups of the privilege for keeping up the contact
through all their kids. Guardians were eventually allowed for staying in the contact of their
kids and the kids could only now and again go home for occasions (Roberts and Jan, 1981).
Sensibly, in any case, if there was no probability that the Indigenous families could have
been the substantial assets for a guarantee of the nonstop general contact, certain of the
policies and the legislation that was presented wherein such a way that none of the family
could refuse it.
Many of the methods of investigations have been to incorporate these expulsions which were
clearly associated with the weight of certain unequivocal nature and also yet not for accepting
that all happened below pressure on the ground of shielding the Indigenous children’s from
the damage, manhandle or disregard. Because of the dispossession and reliance of Indigenous
families, various youngsters’ not just physical but now and then mental prosperity was also
4

imperilled. These youngsters are all things considered inside their rapports of the references
since as they were certainly isolated from all of their Indigenous families and other groups,
normally by the impulse. Interestingly as with the expulsion of the non-Indigenous kids,
evidence of the disregard was generally not even obligatory beforehand an Indigenous
youngster could have been just expelled. Their Aboriginality could certainly get the job done
as it may be up to the interests of the children’s (Norman, et. al, 2018).
Siblings were a part of the secondary level of partition. Frequently the evacuated offspring of
a family were put independently or, where set together; the personalities and the connections
they possessed were certainly not unveiled. Several of the witnesses talked about discovering
significantly later that they had been in an indistinguishable home from at least one of their
siblings. Some of them were certainly of being acquainted with their siblings on the day that
sibling was withdrawing the organization for a cultivate position. Another composed of
leaving their more toddler siblings behind in a halfway house when they were sent to work
somewhere else. Nonetheless, their terms of reference plainly are not restricted to these. The
Investigation received some of the entries had been recognizing the affection and care given
by the non-Indigenous assenting families or the recordings that provided gratefulness for
some of the elevated expectations of the education (Rofe and Winchester, 2017).
Notwithstanding, the majority of the witnesses who made these focuses additionally
communicated their desire that they had not needed to make the forfeits that they had to do.
As per Australian Bureau of Statistics, a survey was conducted for the Indigenous people in
the year 1994 which had been allowing doing the comparison of the further circumstance of
life for the kids that were separated from their families along with the kids that were staying
back with the families. The survey showed that there was no huge distinction between the
two gatherings as for their instructive achievement. Likewise, the kids that were expelled
from their families in adolescence were not any more prone to be utilized. There is a slight
and non-huge propensity for these kids to be more averse to getting utilized than the
individuals who were certainly not removed (Hiscock, et. al, 2016). As per the study nor are
individuals expelled as youngsters altogether more inclined to acquire higher salaries in their
adulthood.
The disparity that could be illustrious in the survey with the evacuated individuals as more
prone to be in the $8,000-$12,000 section while those that were not expelled were highly
prone to be in the $0-$3,000 section, recommends that the evacuated individuals were
5

probably appreciating the advantages of social security. An investigation was built up in the
year 1995 by the previous Attorney General, the Hon. Michael Lavarch MP, in the light of
expanding worry among the key Indigenous offices and groups that the overall population's
obliviousness of the historical backdrop of persuasive evacuation was preventing the
acknowledgement of the necessities of the casualties and their families and the arrangement
of the required services. Indigenous witnesses were giving classified confirmation of their
encounters of coercive expulsion that was requiring the mental support for the procedure and
a while later as a result of the horrible idea of their recollections and the definitely going up
against assignment of relating them to outsiders (Watson, et. al, 2015).
The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) prescribed for the
Investigation that the sustenance should be accommodated for the other groups and the
socially proper introduction of the words with the endorsement of the individuals that were
experiencing the partition policies. The wildness and the sickness that was related with
colonization could be described, in the parlance of the social Darwinism, as a typical practice
for the survival of the fittest. As per this investigation, the ultimate fortune of the Native
individuals was certainly bad; what was required from the governments and the ministers was
to for the even and the withering pillow. When considering appropriating worldwide
Indigenous ways to deal with social work in Australia, there are no less than two principal
contrasts between the Australian Indigenous experience of colonization and that of
Indigenous people groups in the two countries most equivalent with Australia's pioneer
understanding, in particular, Aotearoa New Zealand and Canada (Moran, 2015). Premier is
that bargains and assertions for the most part with respect to local land title, yet in addition
including different rights, have existed between the Native Canadians and the Canadian
government and between the Maori and the New Zealand (NZ) government for well finished
a century.
Despite the fact that these settlements have been regarded more in the breaking than the
keeping up and have not implied these Indigenous people groups have gotten away ruinous
frontier impacts, they have given a superior, or if nothing else unique, premise whereupon to
fabricate relations and contend for, and increase, formal rights and the position.
Albeit Australian social work is focused on upgrading the individuals and the group lives of
Indigenous Australians, these qualities are deciphered and interceded by social specialists
themselves. There is a restricted assortment of work, and not many of the social specialists,
6

accessible to instruct their social labourers for cooperating with Indigenous peoples. Some of
the key parts of this basic social work, some of which have been in the social work group
from its most punctual years and some of which are particular to the basic social work
custom, are secured quickly. For the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people groups,
social equity has been an inaccessible dab on the social skyline (Seddon, et. al, 2015). Social
work seems to have accomplished little in the method for Indigenous auxiliary fairness.
Social specialists were the members during the time spent on dispossession and abuse,
especially in the territories.
The policy of that had impacted the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were of
protectionist legislation. The protectionist legislation was for the most part utilized as a part
of inclination for the general child welfare legislation to expel the Indigenous kids. In this
way, government authorities that had been acting under the specialist of the Central or on the
Board could basically arrange for the evacuation of the Indigenous youngster deprived of
establishing to the fulfilment of the court's that the kid remained disregarded. Another
technique for driving individuals of blended plunge far away from their families and groups
and into the non-Indigenous society was certainly for changing the meaning of Aboriginality
in the security legislation for fitting into the administration's present strategy in the
connection to the Aboriginal undertakings. Individuals having an excess of the specified
extent to the European blood remained precluded for living on the holds with all their
families or further getting apportions. The certain strategy of dispersing the Aboriginal sites
was then utilized as a part of Victoria and New South Wales (Bessarab and Forrest, 2016).
The race was the focal class over which the Australian nationality came to be tacit. The novel
vote based society, as indicated by its own philosophy, tenable its libertarian guideline by
holding fast to English customs and the organizations, and also by keeping up racial unity.
The announced discourses, explanations and talk from the Gathering uncover the decent
variety of assessment to be found among government authorities with extensive involvement
in the Native issues in the initial segment of the twentieth century. Additionally uncovered is
the way that white Australia went about as an organizing gadget that could certainly prompt
the different decisions about the Native strategy and the destiny of Aborigines (Nagle, et. al,
2017).
The Aboriginal Legitimate Administration assesses that around 90% of all the captures in the
Northern Domain are of Natives despite the fact that they are yet 30% of the populace. In
7

Western Australia, Natives make up to 2% of the aggregate populace, in South Australia just
1% and in the Victoria even less. In these three states, 64% of the considerable number of
ladies detainees are Natives and 33% of Aboriginal Western Australia, 70% of the youngsters
in State foundations are the Aborigines (Loos, 2017).
The New South Wales Bureau of Crime statistics expressed that unrepresented Aborigines on
intoxication charges are 34 times or more inclined to get punishments of the detainment than
are whites on a similar charge. The Branch of Aboriginal Affairs conveyed a review conform
to the year 1977 to decide exactly what number of Natives were destitute. Yet, the guidelines
that ran with it expressed ‘Do not include people living in improvised dwellings’. Dwellings
were characterized somewhere else in the shape to incorporate shelter, shed, shanty, auto
body' (Crotty, 2018). Probably, the Administration trusted that exclusive Natives living under
extensions or the night sky are the truly destitute.
8

Conclusion:
The report completed above concludes about the European colonisation of Australia where
many of the children’s where dislodged and many of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander people are cautious of the official institutions and the social welfares. The task also
discusses the elements of the ingenious social work that was carried out in the scenario.
There was the development of various policies and legislation that affected the individuals
and the families that were colonised. One of the legislation which was said as the
Protectionist legislation has been discussed above in the task. The proposal of education was
certainly connected to a risk that if the proposal were not acknowledged then the resulting
partition was unmistakably forced but for the most part the gist and encompassing conditions
of the offers are not up to that kind of reasonable.
9

References:
 Assimilation. Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 51, Number 2,
2005, pp. 168-193.
 Bessarab, D. and Forrest, S., (2016). To discuss community development is to engage
with a term that has its foundations in Western ideology and epistemology. Within an
Indigenous Australian context, before colonisation, this raises the question: Did
community development as a process take place pre-colonisation and, if so, what did
it look like? Was it similar or different to current Western understandings and
processes? Living in today’s society and modern world, we may never know the
answer to these questions but what we can do is examine. Mia Mia Aboriginal
Community Development: Fostering Cultural Security, p.1.
 Crotty, T., (2018). Beyond Genocide: a comparative analysis of the elimination of
Australia’s Indigenous and Torres Strait Islander people. NEW: Emerging scholars in
Australian Indigenous Studies, 2(1), pp.32-37.
 Green, S., Baldry, E. and Gili, N., (2008). Building Indigenous Australian Social
Work. Routledge. Vol. 61, No. 4, December 2008, pp. 389_402
 Hiscock, P., O’Connor, S., Balme, J. and Maloney, T., (2016). World’s earliest
ground-edge axe production coincides with human colonisation of
Australia. Australian Archaeology, 82(1), pp.2-11.
 Loos, N., (2017). Invasion and Resistance: Aboriginal European Relations on the
North Queensland Frontier 1861-1897. Boolarong Press.
 Moran, A., (2005). White Australia, Settler Nationalism and Aboriginal
 Nagle, N., Van Oven, M., Wilcox, S., van Holst Pellekaan, S., Tyler-Smith, C., Xue,
Y., Ballantyne, K.N., Wilcox, L., Papac, L., Cooke, K. and Van Oorschot, R.A.,
(2017). Aboriginal Australian mitochondrial genome variation–an increased
understanding of population antiquity and diversity. Scientific reports, 7, p.43041.
 Norman, K., Inglis, J., Clarkson, C., Faith, J.T., Shulmeister, J. and Harris, D., (2018).
An early colonisation pathway into northwest Australia 70-60,000 years
ago. Quaternary Science Reviews, 180, pp.229-239.
 Roberts and Jan., (1981). Massacres to mining: the colonisation of Aboriginal
Australia. Commonwealth of Australia.
10

 Rofe, M.W. and Winchester, H.P., (2017). Lobethal the Valley of Praise: inventing
tradition for the purposes of place making in rural South Australia. In Geographies of
Australian Heritages (pp. 149-166). Routledge.
 Seddon, P.J., Moro, D., Mitchell, N.J., Chauvenet, A.L. and Mawson, P.R., (2015).
Proactive conservation or planned invasion? Past, current and future use of assisted
colonisation. Advances in reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand
fauna, pp.105-126.
 Watson, M.G., Scardino, A.J., Zalizniak, L. and Shimeta, J., (2015). Colonisation and
succession of marine biofilm-dwelling ciliate assemblages on biocidal antifouling and
fouling-release coatings in temperate Australia. Biofouling, 31(9-10), pp.709-720.
11