The importance of the investments

Running Head: MANAGEMENT
Management
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

2MANAGEMENT
Question 1
The involvement of the PPP has been seen as an essential measure that has been taken
up by the country that has failed in investing to the betterment of the people. As a result, the
implication of the Public Private Partnership is mostly noted in the country that are still
developing. The importance of the investments can be noted in the role that it plays in
ensuring the development of the country in the terms of its economic potentiality and the
sustainable growth of the country.
Six advantages of the PPP in a collaborative nature
1. The advantage of the necessary investment that has been made into the public sector
had been ensured by the organization. It has also ensured the effective management of
the resources available to the public.
2. The advantage of the PPP is noted in the high quality as well as the timely availability
of the provision to be made available to the public.
3. The investments are made gradually and they are not randomly in order to avoid
undue imposition of the expenditure on the expanses. The impact of the stance can be
noted to have a benefits in terms of levying the burden of extra expenditure from the
public
4. Another base of the advantage of the collaboration is noted in the ability of the
collaboration to grant the public with the ability to obtain remuneration on a long term
basis.
5. The expertise and the experience of the private sectors are taken up by the PPP
projects in order to act as a guidelines in the process of the implementation

3MANAGEMENT
6. An appropriate and speculated allocation of the risks has enabled the collaboration to
cut down the risk that lies in the management of the expertise (Hwang, Zhao and Gay
2013).
Following the case study of the Lebanon it had been seen due to the limitation in the
budget as well as in the resources it has been seen that the country had failed to make
any form of investments in the infrastructure of the country. As such the country had
accounted for a high debt in terms of the GDP that accounted for almost 129.26% of
the same. As such, the implication of the high debt can be noted in the inability of the
country to bring about renovation in the infrastructure for the country. The
incapability of the government is also noted in the steps that has been taken by the
country in decreasing the revenue as such the revenue of the country has account for
an amount of $3.95B lower than the expenditure that has been made by the country
(Osei-Kyei and Chan 2015).
As such, the importance of the investment in the infrastructure of the country is noted
in its ability to enhance the potential of the economic development as well as improve
the living standards of the individuals residing in the country.
As such, in the scenario of the crippling economy of the country the attempt that has
been taken by the country to enhance the development is the one of the PPP. The
country had followed the proposition of the European bank that had made the
suggestion that the PPP is the construction of the Public sector where the operation
and the infrastructure related activities takes place which otherwise had been
conducted by the public sector in the developed countries. The areas where the
country has derived its benefits from the PPP included the sectors of the management
related contacts, area of the lease, in order to build and transfer, concession, build own
and operate and partial privatization.

4MANAGEMENT
The advantages of the PPP has been noted in the impact that has been created in the
entire economy of the country where the rate of the unemployment has been
decreased. PPP has also resulted in the creation of many job opportunities by
enhancing their operation related functioning. Another impact of the PPP model for
the country has been noted in the entry of a large number of the operators in the local
market. The advantage of the PPP is noted in the ability of the country to make the
market a monopolistic one where the lack has been experienced in the financial self of
the country.
However, in terms of Saudi Arabia it has been noted that the feature of the PPP has
been lying in the market of Saudi Arabia, however, the country had long record of
implementing the PPP projects in the sector of utilities.
Question 2
Power over is concerned with the way in which the power is distributed in terms of the
partnership. The way in which the scenario have a shape is dependent on the way in which
the one who is making the choice and the ones who have been affected by the execution of
the choice in the concerned sector. Power over therefore refers to the situation where the
decision that has been made by one body impacts the other (Delmon 2017).
Power to is the term that has been referred to the productivity of the potential power of the
country or the organization. It also enhances the possibility of the new process of coming in
the way. The concept of the power to has been built by the unique part of the potential that
has every single individual is marked by the capability of creating an impact about the
happenings in their lives. It is dealt with the power that can be utilized in order to make the
difference and develop something new and achieve the goal that has been aimed at by the
body (Ismail 2013).

5MANAGEMENT
Power for has been referred to the productivity and the potentially of the generative power of
the country and the organization. The potentiality of the individual has been noted and the
actions that has been created without the domination of the relationship that has been
developed. The power in the partnership is dependent upon the ability to make some
differences and come up with the possibilities of creating something new and achieve the
desired goals in the partnership.
While the private sector has been seen in its ability to adopt the short comings of PPP. It has
been beneficial for the organization in order to avail the finance related help and other aspects
that has been achieved by the organizations in a greater extent. In case the return turns out to
be negative, it has been borne by both the customers as well as the organization. The
challenges has been noted in the both the political as well as the social sphere. The changes
needed to be implemented and the introduction of the same. The private sectors had been
cautious enough in accepting the major risks that has been beyond the control of the
organization. The power of the organization at involving the power of the customers in the
decision making process is noted in the fact that the organization had been able to bring about
changes in the pricing, that has been reflected in an automatic nature.
The intervention of the government is also noted in the legal sphere and as such it is
important for the firms to adhere to the power within the collaboration in order to bring about
the changes in the scenario. As such, in order to accept the high chances of risks that is
imbedded with the organization is noted in their ability to accept the risks as well as enhance
certain amount of control over the process of the operation (Hodge and Greve 2017).
The power of the public sector is noted in the fact that the function with the amount of money
that has been provided to the organization. As such the performance within the organization
is noted by the incentives. However, it is important to focus on the requirement of the

6MANAGEMENT
performance and the outputs of the organization that is based on the process. It would also
provide the organization with the ability to monitor the process (Wang et al.,2018).
Another important factor that has been noted in the respect is that the power of the
go9vernment continues to exist as the people will be considering the government responsible
for the process that has been adopted by the organization. As such the importance of the
power is that the government need to retain certain amount of responsibility in the process of
partnership. It is also up to the government in order to understand the implication of the
arrangements that needed to be considered in the process of the PPP. As such the implication
of the regulatory framework and the legal attributed are important in term of the sustainable
solution. The long nature of the PPP is associated with the agreement. The enhanced nature
of the project and the complexities of the process that is associated with the PPP. However,
the difficulties is located in the development of the project and the changes that has been
noted in the government policy.

7MANAGEMENT
References
Delmon, J., 2017. Public-private partnership projects in infrastructure: an essential guide
for policy makers. Cambridge university press.
Hodge, G.A. and Greve, C., 2017. On public–private partnership performance: A
contemporary review. Public Works Management & Policy, 22(1), pp.55-78.
Hwang, B.G., Zhao, X. and Gay, M.J.S., 2013. Public private partnership projects in
Singapore: Factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from the perspective of
contractors. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), pp.424-433.’
Ismail, S., 2013. Critical success factors of public private partnership (PPP) implementation
in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration.
Osei-Kyei, R. and Chan, A.P., 2015. Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for
Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. International journal of project
management, 33(6), pp.1335-1346.
Wang, H., Xiong, W., Wu, G. and Zhu, D., 2018. Public–private partnership in public
administration discipline: A literature review. Public management review, 20(2), pp.293-316.