1RESPONSES TO POST Response to Post 2 The post on Consumer Motivation is a comprehensive post which states down the manner in which the company would be required to follow a comprehensive policy in regards to attracting the different customers in a right manner (Barbopoulos & Johansson, 2016).The post has given the theory related to the consumer motivation in the right way and provided how the companies would be required to target the population in a manner such that the various goals and objectives of the firm can be achieved and the customer needs can also be fulfilled. However, in this scenario, the case of the legitimacy of these needs and wants comes into question. It can be rightfully mentioned that, it is the role of the different companies to ensure that, although targetingtheconsumerisaconsideratestrategy,theneedsofthecustomerscannotbe materialized and the legitimacy needs to be maintained accordingly. Very often the firm engages in unethical activities to encourage the different customers to purchase the products and hence, this can be considered to be rather incorrect and may influence the customers incorrectly and lead to additional purchases (Kim & Drumwright, 2016). Therefore, this post is a good example of how the firm would be required to target the various customers in a legitimate manner and how the customer needs can be met easily. However,italsobecomescriticaltounderstandthat,variousorganizationsoftenarises materialism within the different participants who are present and in consideration with this, can lead to the purchase of unwanted products and related requirements accordingly.
2RESPONSES TO POST References Barbopoulos, I., & Johansson, L. O. (2016). A multi-dimensional approach to consumer motivation: exploring economic, hedonic, and normative consumption goals.Journal of Consumer Marketing. Kim, E., & Drumwright, M. (2016). Engaging consumers and building relationships in social media: How social relatedness influences intrinsic vs. extrinsic consumer motivation.Computers in Human Behavior,63, 970-979.
3RESPONSES TO POST Response to Post 3 The post serves as a critical appraisal of the manner in which the different companies generally tend to arrive at an understanding of how the different customers in the different countries would be required to be dealt with. In addition to this, the post provides a critical understanding of the various factors which generally influence an individual to make sufficient decision making (Frederiks, Stenner & Hobman, 2015).In addition to this, it states an exclusive example of how Starbucks has been able to attain success in terms of the diffusion theory. All in all it provides a comprehensive analysis of the Decision making of the consumers and how the diffusion theory can contribute towards its understanding. In order to increase the number of customers, Starbucks can include a new menu which would cater to the tastes of the target market (Maniatis, 2016).At present the company has kept a standardized menu which has perhaps prevented the firm from being successful in Australia. In consideration with this, it becomes considerably successful for the enterprise to customize the menu and on the basis of this, take advantage of the audience characteristics so that they are being able to expand to Australia and are being able to fulfill their global expansion goals. Therefore, the Diffusion model serves as asuccessful theory which can thereby assist an enterprise to expand successfully in the long run and to ensure that, they can capture a large number of customers.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4RESPONSES TO POST References Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Hobman, E. V. (2015). Household energy use: Applying behaviouraleconomicstounderstandconsumerdecision-makingand behaviour.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,41, 1385-1394. Maniatis, P. (2016). Investigating factors influencing consumer decision-making while choosing green products.Journal of Cleaner Production,132, 215-228.