logo

Project Management Aspect of Bone Substitute

13 Pages3456 Words176 Views
   

Added on  2020-02-24

Project Management Aspect of Bone Substitute

   Added on 2020-02-24

ShareRelated Documents
ProjectResolve management problem associated with the spinal fusion by providing newtechniques and procedures
Project Management Aspect of Bone Substitute_1
ContentsIntroduction:..........................................................................................................................................2Background:..........................................................................................................................................2Research questions:...............................................................................................................................3Aims and objectives:.............................................................................................................................3Literature Review:.................................................................................................................................3Vertebral Fusion Process:......................................................................................................................6Significance:..........................................................................................................................................6Result and outcome:..............................................................................................................................8Conclusion:............................................................................................................................................9References:..........................................................................................................................................10Appendix 1:.........................................................................................................................................12
Project Management Aspect of Bone Substitute_2
Introduction:This project focuses on the project management aspect of bone substitutes used to promote vertebral fusion in spinal surgery. The surgical procedures used to correct spinal conditions such as Adolescence Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) generally consist of titanium screws and rods to confine spine deformation together with the use of bone grafts in order to promote vertebral fusion. Spine surgery strongly depends on particular fusion technique of bone allograft. The bone allograft is the surgical procedure which is commonly used for fixing the bone problems. The bone allograft helps in fixing the bone which is damaged from trauma. It is the most recommended practice for knee replacement. “There is some limitation in the bone substitute methodology which is used to cure spine surgery” (Bae, 2017). The surgeons are looking forward for the innovative technology which can minimise the risks of infection associated with the bone surgery. The bioactive glass is used for providing structure, mechanical strength, and architecture to the fractured bone. “It helps in promoting regeneration of the damaged tissues because the bio active materials are made up of ceramic and silicon oxide which are naturally present in the human body” (Wang, 2015). The purposeof this project is to resolve management problems associated with the promotion of the vertebral fusion for the assessment of bone substitute. Background:The traditional surgical procedures which are used for bone grafting are vertebral fusion, bone allograft, and others. The vertebral fusion focuses on overcoming the problem associated with the insertion of bone allograft into the allocated disc space. The bone allograft helps in fixing the bone which is damaged from trauma. It is the most recommendedpractice for knee replacement. The other common procedures which are used for bone grafting are making use of intervertebral cages made of titanium or polymer. The lumbar fusion is depends on bone morphogenetic protein which is the common substitute of crest bone grafting surgery. The demand of spinal fusion is continuously increasing from last 10 years. The success of the long term fusion makes use of biological process by using surgical fixation techniques. The risks which are associated with the spinal fusion are such as cause ofinfection due to metallic fixation, difficulty in bone grafting during surgery, and the dependence on the specific surgical techniques, addition of stress in the patient behaviour, and others. “The migration of anterior grafting requires the repetition of the spinal surgery”
Project Management Aspect of Bone Substitute_3
(Sheikh, 2017). The PLIF or TLIF methodology should be adopt for placing the anterior device anteriorly. The posterior approach is the safest approach which is used for carrying over revision spine fusion surgery. Research questions:What the possible steps which should be taken to resolve the problem of infection occurs in spinal surgery?What are the new policies and regulations which are used to overcome the issues and problems occurred in the spinal fusion?What are the guidelines which should be adopted by the surgeons for providing medication at the time of spinal surgery?How to overcome the healing problem in spinal surgery?What are the steps which should be followed by the surgeons to reduce the risks of infection in the patient?Which is the best approach used for providing spinal fusion? Why?Aims and objectives:The aim of this project is to resolve the management problem associated with the spinal fusion by providing new guidelines and procedures to the surgeon to reduce the chance of risks accompanied with the spinal surgery. The risks associated with the bone grafting are transmission of the infectious disease, HIV, syphilis, and bacterial sepsis. The objective is to provide a systematic architecture to handle the management problems associated with the spinal surgery. The management tools and techniques help in improving the health conditionsof the patient by getting appropriate treatment within a short period of time.Literature Review:The complications are reported with the spinal fusion are occurrence of superficial occurrence, seromas of superficial surgery, hematomas, vascular injuries, neurologic injuries,pain related with the chronic donor, complication in wound reoperations, bone grafting is not clearly done, and difficulty in carrying out daily activities. The traditional practices which areused in the bone grafting are allograft bone, bone morphogenetic proteins, synthetic bone substitutes, demineralized bone matrix, and cell based matrices. The key drivers which are used for spinal fusion are categorised as joint reconstruction of spinal fusion, increasing rate
Project Management Aspect of Bone Substitute_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Cost Effective Management for Different Biomaterials Used in Spinal Fusion Surgery
|28
|2193
|114

(PDF) To Graft or Not to Graft?
|9
|3105
|99

Anisotropic Approach to Treatment Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
|24
|4395
|347