logo

Right to be forgotten

4 Pages749 Words316 Views
   

Added on  2020-05-16

About This Document

THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN 1 THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN Coherent Argument on Right to be forgotten Name of the student: Name of the university: Author note The right to be forgotten is a part of the modern cyber technology and it becomes an important topic in many countries since 2006 (Post 2017). In certain cases it has been observed that people are uploading certain things to the internet and those things or data belongs to the personal or private life of others. In the European Union

Right to be forgotten

   Added on 2020-05-16

ShareRelated Documents
Running head: THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTENCoherent Argument on Right to be forgottenName of the student:Name of the university:Author note
Right to be forgotten_1
1THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTENThe right to be forgotten is a part of the modern cyber technology and it becomesan important topic in many countries since 2006 (Post 2017). In certain cases it has beenobserved that people are uploading certain things to the internet and those things or databelongs to the personal or private life of others. After certain times, he thought that he shouldhave deleted certain portion from the uploaded content. Right to be forgotten confers thisright to them so that they can erase some or whole content that does no longer exist. Most ofthe developed countries like England, France and USA have the provision on right to beforgotten. In the European Union, this right has been treated as essential elements of humanrights law (Youm and Park 2016).The concept of the right to be forgotten is a matter of conflict among thefundamental right seeker and many scholars. According to Pino (2000), the right to beforgotten and right to privacy are different from each other to certain extent. In his words, thepersonal data and information are come under the purview of right to privacy; whereas thepublicly known contents are contained in right to be forgotten. On the other hand, the right tobe forgotten should be treated as under the right to privacy because of its very nature.According to certain human right seeker, it has been observed that certain individual orcompanies are publishing or uploading private information about someone to earn illegal gainor economic gain. Therefore, it should be the right of the person to erase all the documents toprotect their own rights. In the case of Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española deProtección de Datos, Mario Costeja González(2014), it has been held by Court of Justicethat commercial websites are disclosing the private information of others with an intention toearn profit. This system must be closed and citizens must get the rights to remove the relevantlinks on the contents by the help of this right. Most of the commercial sites are taking the help of the cyber technology to collectand store information about others (Diniz 2017). The amount of collection is depending on
Right to be forgotten_2

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Information Technology Law | Google Inc v. AEPD Case
|12
|4612
|51

Google and the Right to Be Forgotten | Assignment
|5
|1037
|21

The Right to be Forgotten – The rules today and the rules tomorrow
|4
|1014
|338

Foundations of MIS & CBT - Report
|6
|1511
|179

General Data Protection Regulation: Assignment
|5
|1002
|402

Digital Data Privacy
|9
|2259
|59