European Union Social Policy: Debates and Developments

This report discusses the debates and developments in the European Union regarding social policy and its role in the single market. It covers topics such as employment market flexibility, taxation and benefit systems, and the impact of leaving the single market. The report also suggests methods of enhancing the EU's capability in the field of social policy.

Introduction
The European Union has a major role in stating the social policies.
Its role comes from primary value based objectives of providing the
financial corporation the meaning, targeting at welfare of the
residents, and from requirement of stating the different condition
addressed by the EU like for an example, movement’s freedom,
consequential requirement to state the powers of the employees
and social security through the borders. The purposes are clear;
however, the sources go on difficult. The social policy is very
debatable area of European Union competence. The following
parts state the arguments in the European Union regarding
whether or not social policy is in the inherent essential part of the
single market. The report states European Union capability to
administer the service relations, protection at workplace, fairness,
justice and the social security. It deals with cooperation between
state members over the social issues such as social security,
promotion in job, and facts related to labour market. It also states
whether European Union is required to be a financial assignment
or take broad social liability and political liability (Daly, 2006).
This report suggests the method of enhancing the European Union
capability in the field since the Treaty of Rome. However,

describes that it was debatably the Treaty of Amsterdam that had
great influence in ranging capability by integrating societal section
in a major body of Treaty. This part reflects the occurrence of
European Union commands on social issues. It states that course
of European Union legislature, primary relatively slow, collected by
late 1980s adopting the Single European Act and again during
early 2000s. It is stated in report, the highest degree of
fragmentation in respect of whether European Union act in the field
of social policy and service policy was helpful or essential
(Scharph, 2002).
Economic integration narrative of Europe-
The past backgrounds of European Social Policy may be tracked
to TOR developing the European Economic Community. As per
the Treaty of Rome (1957), the social policy capabilities were to
continue in the regulation of MS and new created community must
have partial interference in the field of policies. From the TOR
(1958) to the Maastricht Treaty (1990), Europe moved
progressively however definitely to close financial incorporation
such as the inner marketplace. The internal marketplace was the
requirement for intra-field interchange rates constancy. The
concept of separate money, first discovered by report of Werner of

1970, was unrestrained. Further, in late 1980 and early 1990, while
local incorporation made significant paces, this concept emerged
again. The separate financial policy was regarded as the rational
accompaniment to the requirement for fixed exchange rate and
new rule of movement of capital, which were applied by inner
marketplace (Sapir, 2006).
Developments in future, specifically in single market-
The European single market very aspiring portion of European
project. The European single market targets at the breaking down
of obstacles to dealing through five hundred people field by making
sure the four freedoms like free movement of products, capital,
service and employment. As the member of European Union,
United Kingdom has did sign up to every freedom like free
movement of services, products, employment and capital, as
Brussels has frequently made perfect, are non-transferable
(Threlfall, 2003). Being the portion of single market provides the
businesses of United Kingdom unconstrained entree to five
hundred million consumers in every state in it and permits the
corporations and customers to buy the products and service
through the landmass. This ends the fares or charges and

decreases the cost and managerial burden by implementing the
rule over all the state members.
There is difference between single market and custom union that
makes sure every nation charges the equal import duty to the
states, who are not member, however do not say anything in
respect of free movement of workforce. It is frequently stated by
the PM that United Kingdom would not keep the complete entree
to the custom union however, has not able to protect the contract
on what create the different relations would take. The single
market is regulated by the amount of legislature, which targets to
match regulations on whole thing from extreme working hours to
what confronting the changes in climate. In this way, without
adopting the united norms, the single market finishes to be the
single market by way of any one nation may apply their personal
regulations. This is conceivable to stop in single market however
be out of the custom union, as European financial field nations do.
This permits the states to negotiate the personal commercial
dealings and to take out of certain legislatures, particularly fly-
fishing rations. Nevertheless, they still have to apply law of
European Union related to the single market’s operations involving
the unrestricted movement of persons (Martin, 1998).

The question is that what can be influence of leaving the single
market. The forty four per cent of export of Britain go to European
Union, two hundred twenty billion pounds out of five hundred ten
billion pounds, according to the National Statistics office. In the
case where United Kingdom did not negotiate the positive trading
deals with the European Union, this export will be subject to import
additional managerial cost and tariff. In the time before new
dealings were applied, United Kingdom will possibly have to deal
on standard tariff as per WTO rules. However, the major changes
will be that the United Kingdom will not have to sign up to
unrestricted movement of workforce. The migration has the most
disruptive Brexit problem of all and great number of persons voted
to leave to see it decreased. Out of the European Union, the nation
will have the powers to restrict the numbers of asylum seekers to
take entry in the nation. The details have been addressed by the
government as to how it will handle the immigration to make sure
that business may still employ the personnel with the assistances
they require. United Kingdom would also not have to adopt certain
laws of European Union, however this would have to sign up to
various norms in case it desires entree to the single market
through the trading contract.

UK view Vs German view-
In the year 1990, single market of Europe and strong European
opposition approaches have given the substitute structure of the
ruling and protected the level playing area across the United
Kingdom and European Union as whole. Subsequent to Brexit, it
would evaporate. The government of United Kingdom has been
asking for the requirement for the methods to protect the individual
single market of United Kingdom. Germany as well as to certain
extent, Belgium and Holland were the promoters of the European
marketplace. The main ones concern delegated manpower, skilled
labour and some other factors to enhance competitiveness. In this
way, from starting, resistance to Europeanize social methods was
obvious in a position considered by the Germany that favoured the
neo-liberal, free-market approach or European market to the public
associations of the communities. The top industry legislatives of
Germany have made warn that they would not lobby
for special entree in the single market for United Kingdom
(Liebfried and Peirson, 1995).

Employment market or labour market-
The flexible employment market refers to the employment market
that rapidly changes according to a competitive equilibrium. The
labour market or employment market is significant because they
are dynamic to the effectiveness of the economy of the European
Union, in the present time or in the upcoming period. The
employment market flexibility has been increased because the
globalization has opened Unite Kingdom to more struggle at
international level. The other reasons include changes in
technologies, changes in social atmosphere, privatisation and
decreasing powers of Trade Union. The common reviews have
been taken by the Directorate General for the Financial and
Economic Affairs in respect of the employment market across
European Union. The reviews make focus on the major pointers
related to employment market and other facts as per the particular
requirements and provisions. They majorly focus on the problems
of labour market such as employment tax, economic enticements
and wages, reform related to employment market, specifically
evaluation of complete influence on the labour market reform on
macroeconomic enactment (Atkinson, et. al, 2004).

Impact of flexible employment market
The flexible employment market helps in reducing the
unemployment, in decreasing the wage rate and in increasing the
uncertainty of job. There is poor labour efficiency in the United
Kingdom. It is because of the numerous factors; however improved
labour market suppleness can put off the entities from making
investment in human being capital. In the case where workforce
are on short-term agreements then investment can finish being
shattered. Besides this, the flexible employment market helps to
decrease the cost of firm. They may hire the employees for few

hours. The United Kingdom has comparatively light employment
market regulations in the comparison of European nations like
Germany and France. It can be seen that United Kingdom has also
the fall in authorized unemployment rate (Wilthagen, Tros and Van
Lieshout, 2004).
Source: CER
In both fields, the work contains the frequent investigation or
reviewing and evaluation of the development in every state
member. The Directorate General develops ad hoc studies and
evaluates the particular theme to give contribution in creating the
European Union policy discussion and recommendation on the
policies of employment market. The extensive database has been

developed to establish the proper structure for the investigation
of employment marketplaces. The working of the employment
market, and tax and benefit system is main fact of the financial
policies. Globalisation, the growing flexibility of the aspects like
products and capital, old people and funding the wellbeing system,
set new issues for the procedures (Feldmann, 2002).
The taxation and benefit systems are assessed by the European
Commission from the point of view of how they make contribution
to financial progress and high occupation, when securing
reasonable social security. Specific interest is committed to the
problems of creating job pay, how to funding the welfare state, and
process of application of tax and benefit system that is motivating
to progress and occupation (Alber and Standing, 2000).
Further, there are certain nations, which are trying to attain
flexibility with the protection for the employees like in Denmark.
The flexicurity is viewed by the Denmark Government as requiring
the golden triangle the three sides such as flexibility in employment
market mixed with, social protection and proper employment
marketplace policy with powers and duties for the jobless person.
This expression means the mixture of employment market
flexibility in the active economy and protection for the employees.

The flexicurity is considered by European Commission as
combined approach to concurrently increase the flexibility and
protection in the employment marketplace. The Flexicurity is
created and applied through 4 policy elements such as consistent
arrangement, inclusive long-term knowledgeable approaches,
proper policies in relation to the employment market, and new
system of social protection to provide proper income sustenance
throughout the labour transitions (Bekker and Mailand, 2019).
Source: Real world Economics Review Blog

Social policy and productivity
The European single market was considered as organisational
reaction to the Euro sclerosis of the early 80s. The aim of the
programs was to end every non-tariff obstacles to open movement
of products, service, people, and capital in the end of year 1992.
The constraint’s release targeted to supply significant
achievements through the union regarding the high productivity
level and low cost and price. The single market enhanced the
competition in the European Union. The influence of the single
market over the productivity has less care and this is still open
problem. There are various technologies to debate the single
European market importantly enhanced efficiency in various
European nations (Holland, Mossialos and Merkel, 2018).
Possible future reforms
There are some suggestions to change the relations between
United Kingdom and European Union, which were achieved as
portion of social policy reviews. These reviews involved decreasing
the difficulty and enhancing the transparency of legal procedure of
European Union, more reliable implementation of the principle of
good administration by EU, improvement in procedure of social

partner’s participation to make sure representativeness and
transparency. The reviews also include the organisational changes
to provide the tool to react to ruling of ECJ, which go afar the
intention of European Union legislation, making sure that United
Kingdom is the positive and involved member in European Union
negotiation (Cini and Borragán, 2016).
Conclusion
As per the above analysis, it can be concluded that the important
part of economy of Europe is expected to create profit for persons
in the place of depositors and holders. It is social economy. This
involves the mutual society, NPO, and social companies. The
mutual societies, NPO, and social companies run a wide range of
trading activities, render the broad variety of the services and
goods through the single market of Europe, and make various
jobs. The social companies are also the train for public or
collective innovations (Hoskyns, 2018). The founders of EU have
various targets described at the formation of what is familiar in the
present day as European Union, were the settlement among the
opposing European countries. Additionally, the Treaty of Rome
also created clear that the lessening of inequalities between the
MS of Union was as significant as rapid financial regaining of the

war-torn Europe. The social entities give the contribution in the
employment of European Union, social consistency, local
development, provincial development, and security of atmosphere,
third nation progress, cultivated growth, and policies related to
social protection (Kauppi, 2018).

References
Alber, J. and Standing, G., 2000. Social dumping, catch-up or
convergence? Europe in a comparative global context. Journal of
European Social Policy, 10(2), pp.99-119.
Atkinson, A.B., Marlier, E. and Nolan, B., 2004. Indicators and
targets for social inclusion in the European Union. JCMS: Journal
of Common Market Studies, 42(1), pp.47-75.
Bekker, S. and Mailand, M., 2019. The European flexicurity
concept and the Dutch and Danish flexicurity models: How have
they managed the Great Recession?. Social Policy &
Administration, 53(1), pp.142-155.
Cini, M. and Borragán, N.P.S. eds., 2016. European union politics.
Oxford University Press.
Daly, M., 2006. EU social policy after Lisbon. JCMS: Journal of
Common Market Studies, 44(3), pp.461-481.

Feldmann, H., 2002. How social is European social
policy?. International Journal of Social Economics, 29(7), pp.547-
574.
Holland, W., Mossialos, E. and Merkel, B., 2018. Public health
policies in the European Union. Routledge.
Hoskyns, C., 2018. Democratizing the European Union: issues for
the twenty-first century. Routledge.
Kauppi, N., 2018. Democracy, social resources and political power
in the European Union.
Liebfried & Peirson (eds), (1995),’European Social Policy:
Between
fragmentation and integration’, Brookings Institution Press
Martin, J.P., 1998. What works among active labour market
policies: evidence from. In OECD Countries’ experiences, OECD
Occasional Papers.

Sapir, A., 2006. Globalization and the reform of European social
models. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), pp.369-
390.
Scharph T, (2002),’The European social model: Coping with
challenges and
diversity’, Journal Of Common Market Studies
Threlfall, M., 2003. European social integration: harmonization,
convergence and single social areas. Journal of European Social
Policy, 13(2), pp.121-139.
Wilthagen, T., Tros, F. and Van Lieshout, H., 2004. Towards
‘flexicurity’? Balancing flexibility and security in EU Member
States. European journal of social security, 6(2), pp.113-136.