Socialization in University of Australia: A Sociological Perspective

This article discusses the socialization process in University of Australia from a sociological perspective. It covers the learning environment, cultural diversity, and factors contributing to socialization. The article also highlights the role of education and training in socialization.

RUNNING HEAD: Sociology 0
Sociology

Sociology 1
According to Johnson, 2007, Australia is regarded as an extremely culturally varied country.
The students studying in Australia find themselves studying in a mesmerizing and diverse
environment. The culture in the University Of Australia has different learning styles
(Johnson, 2007). Unlike other nations, the students in the University Of Australia do not live
in the campus. They requisite to travel to another state for study. Most of the students do not
reside in the student lodging and live at home (Kaufmann, 2017). The students are not
conspicuously tangled to the campus in the similar way. The students’ workout exclusive
control over customs and select to engage with the university experience. The commitment
with the university totally depends on the students (Verger, Lubienski and Steiner-Khamsi,
2016). As per Hannon and D'Netto, 2007, the students can select to float in and can attend
lectures in the license. The students make efforts to know their peers. The university
experience is created completely by their own choices (Hannon and D'Netto, 2007). It is
applied to the academic standard of the students as well. If a student is not capable of
handling an assignment then he can lose specified percentage of the score that has been
attained till a fixed date (Ballantine, Hammack and Stuber, 2017). A student will simply fail
afterward (Lippényi and Gerber, 2016). The students at the university are preserved like an
adult who takes complete accountability of their social and practical efforts (Castaño,
Méndez and Galindo, 2015). The University of Australia takes care of the interest and
requirements of the international students to the highest standard (Alexander, 2016).
As per Melnick and Wann, 2011, the socialization is the process of acquiring information,
skills, and outlooks to empower students to contribute as effective members of the society
(Melnick and Wann, 2011). The socialization in the University of Australia assists in
understanding personality and character development. It states to the way young students
learn through growing up and the way becomes members of the society (Mehta and Davies,
2018). The students accept the social norms and behaviors of the society (Demaine and
Entwistle, 2016). The factors contributing to the socialization are beliefs, gender, sexuality,
ethnicity and culture, class and status, family and kinship. The professional values and
standards lead to the socialization in the institution (Moon, 2016). According to the
Churchman, 2006, the socialization is the procedure through which students are introduced to
the culture of an institution. It comprises attitudes, values, skills and behavior patterns
(Churchman, 2006). It is a procedure of learning ancient roles and formations in order to
obtain fresh ones. It is attained by a process by means of which people obtain culture. The
socialization is a serious feature of the student’s progress (Rossberger and Krause, 2015). The

Sociology 2
socialization occurs in two ways. In a first way, socialization happens through education and
training which is specifically linked to the substances of the role (Brown, 2018). It is
monitored by socialization through work atmosphere and agents. Some features of the first
socialization could be unwanted now so that the professionals can behave skilfully. Whereas,
few others will be sustained relying on the expert choices, forces, and situational constraints
(Bowe, Ball and Gold, 2017).

Sociology 3
References
Alexander, R., 2016. Migration, education and employment: socio-cultural factors in shaping
individual decisions and economic outcomes in Orkney and Shetland. Island Studies
Journal, 11(1), pp.177-192.
Ballantine, J.H., Hammack, F.M. and Stuber, J., 2017. The sociology of education: A
systematic analysis. Routledge.
Bowe, R., Ball, S.J. and Gold, A., 2017. Reforming education and changing schools: Case
studies in policy sociology. Routledge.
Brown, R., 2018. Knowledge, education, and cultural change: papers in the sociology of
education. Routledge.
Castaño, M.S., Méndez, M.T. and Galindo, M.Á., 2015. The effect of social, cultural, and
economic factors on entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), pp.1496-1500.
Churchman, D., 2006. Institutional Commitments, Individual Compromises: Identity‐related
responses to compromise in an Australian university. Journal of Higher Education Policy
and Management, 28(1), pp.3-15.
Demaine, J. and Entwistle, H. eds., 2016. Beyond communitarianism: citizenship, politics and
education. Springer.
Hannon, J. and D'Netto, B., 2007. Cultural diversity online: student engagement with
learning technologies. International journal of educational management, 21(5), pp.418-432.
Johnson, C., 2007. John Howard's ‘values’ and Australian identity. Australian journal of
political science, 42(2), pp.195-209.
Kaufmann, V., 2017. Re-thinking mobility: contemporary sociology. Routledge.
Lippényi, Z. and Gerber, T.P., 2016. Inter-generational micro-class mobility during and after
socialism: The power, education, autonomy, capital, and horizontal (PEACH) model in
Hungary. Social science research, 58, pp.80-103.
Mehta, J. and Davies, S. eds., 2018. Education in a New Society: Renewing the Sociology of
Education. University of Chicago Press.

Sociology 4
Melnick, M.J. and Wann, D.L., 2011. An examination of sport fandom in Australia:
Socialization, team identification, and fan behavior. International Review for the Sociology of
Sport, 46(4), pp.456-470.
Moon, R.J., 2016. Internationalisation without cultural diversity? Higher education in
Korea. Comparative education, 52(1), pp.91-108.
Rossberger, R.J. and Krause, D.E., 2015. Participative and team-oriented leadership styles,
countries’ education level, and national innovation: the mediating role of economic factors
and national cultural practices. Cross-Cultural Research, 49(1), pp.20-56.
Verger, A., Lubienski, C. and Steiner-Khamsi, G. eds., 2016. World yearbook of education
2016: The global education industry. Routledge.