The Untested System Assignment PDF
6 Pages2052 Words100 Views
Added on 2021-04-21
The Untested System Assignment PDF
Added on 2021-04-21
ShareRelated Documents
SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND MATHS, CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITYA Dilemma in IT: The UntestedSystemAssignment 1: Doing Ethics TechniqueYour NameStudent NumberWord Count: 962
The Untested SystemITC506 Assessment Item 1- Marking SheetTotal Obtained Marks/100 & /15CriteriaStandardsMarksawardedAnalysis of the ethical dilemma using the Doing Ethics Technique(DET) (Value: 70%)HD: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, identifies all the ethical issues, evaluates all the options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and justifies why this option is the best using supporting arguments based on the literature.DI: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, lists all the ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and explains why this option is the best.CR: Answers all DET questions, lists most of the facts, identifies most of the non-ethical issues, lists most of the stakeholders, lists most of the ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and makes an attempt to explain why this option is thebest.PS: Answers some of the DET questions, lists a few facts, identifies a few non-ethical issues, lists a few stakeholders, lists a few ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these but without explaining why this option is the best.FL: Answers a few DET questions but fails to list important facts, fails to identify relevant non-ethical issues, fails to list important stakeholders, fails to identify the ethical issues and evaluates the options that seek to resolve them and does not select the best option or does not explain whythe option selected is the best.Writing & structure(Value 20%)HD: Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, concisely, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose with no spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.DI: Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas.Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.Grammar & spelling accurate.CR: Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas.Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors.PS: The text contains frequent errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and structure, lacks clarity, and is not concise, but the meaning is apparent to the reader with some effort.FL: Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas.Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner.Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised.Grammar & spelling contains many errors.Referencing(Value 10%)HD: Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, andconforms exactly to APA style conventions.DI: Very good referencing, including reference list and citations.High quality references.CR:Good referencing, including reference list and citations. Good quality references.Your Name
The Untested SystemPS:Referencing is comprehensive, mostly accurate according to APA styleconventions, and demonstrates academic integrity. Some minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, etc) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or demonstration of academic integrity.FL: Sub-standard (or no) referencing. Poor quality (or no) references.Total MarksQ1. What's going on?In the given scenario, there is an ethical dilemma regarding the launch of an untested system. As per the video, the developer tells the project manager that going live with the developed system will not be possible on the date provided by the client. He also explains that the main tester of the system has fallen sick and has been unable to test the system within the required time (Al-Saggaf, 2018). He further tells him that launching the untested system will not be a very good idea in spite of the fact that the project head continues to saythat the system must go live on the given date.Q2. What are the facts?Due to the unavailability of certain members of the development team, the testing of the system could not be completed and hence, the system is not ready to go live. However, the client has provided a deadline on which, the system must go live as emphasized by the project manager. On the other hand, as per the concern of the developer, if the system goeslive before testing, there may be future complications that will affect the client as well as the reputation of the development company.Q3. What are the issues?There are a number of issues associated with this particular case. Firstly, the developer did not report to the project manager earlier regarding the unavailability of the tester and hence, it is quite clear the developer is not completely honest regarding the progress of the project (Mannay & Morgan, 2015). Secondly, the project manager emphasizes that the system must go live on the said date as provided by the client as it would affect the businessrelationship between the company and the client. However, the project manager fails to understand the amount of risk that is to be taken if the system is allowed to go live on the given date.Q4. Who is affected?Your Name
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Assignment on The Untested Systemlg...
|8
|2064
|46
(PDF) Systems development methodologieslg...
|7
|2053
|44
Information Technology Ethics Assignment | DETlg...
|6
|2059
|84
(PDF) Ethics and Information Technologieslg...
|8
|2135
|26
(Solved) Doing Ethics Technique: Assignmentlg...
|9
|2019
|217
Doing Ethics Technique - Assignmentlg...
|10
|2090
|33