Theories of Leadership

Running Head: THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP 1
Theories of Leadership
Name:
Institution Affiliation:

THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP 2
Introduction
Leadership is in most organizations is a term to be a complicated issue within the
managerial positions. The term of leadership has been in present use in different organizations
from the time of the late 1700s (Belu, 2018). Even then, technical investigation on the subject
failed to commence until the late 20th century. From that era, however, there exists an intensive
investigation on the issue. In the present society, leadership styles affect individuals in diverse
ways, and they are an essential aspect to consider when developing an individual’s skills as a
business leader. Therefore, the need to have an adequate understanding of leadership theories
and their impacts of workers is vital in operations of a different organization. The understanding
of impacts of theory may assist individuals to craft their messages in the manner that motivates
as well as inspires their team of workers. For decades, leadership theories have been the primary
source of numerous researchers. The opinions of leadership are commonly categorized by which
aspects are believed to define the leader the most (Junker & van Dick, 2014). The most general
theories of leadership comprise of Great Man hypothesis, Trait Theory, Contingency Theories,
Behavioral hypotheses, Transactional hypotheses, alongside Transformational Theories.
Therefore, the primary target of this research paperwork is to explore theories of leadership by
reviewing current research on its evolution and applicability.
Current research on the evolution of leadership theories
Several surveyors have tried to establish the precise definition of leadership that
encompasses the intricacy of this universal term. One simplified description of leadership is that
it refers to the process of impacting the organized group towards attaining its goals (Foroughi,
Gabriel, & Fotaki, 2019). The definition emphasizes the usefulness of viewing leadership as the
process directed at impacting a particular group of individuals to meet the stated goal. It has been

THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP 3
reported that leadership is one of the most observed as well as the least understood phenomena in
the global society. Such concern only occurs not just in knowing the operations of hypothesis but
even in its description. Mahajan (2015) stated that there exists a various definition of headship as
those individuals that have tried to describe this idea. The society continues to keep attempting to
describe the fundamental inquiry of characteristics of a valuable leader. Such inquiries have
caused considerable attention because leadership leads to the effective management of the image
of the company.
Leadership periods
While ancient evolutionary designs illustrate every period of progress is happening in the
sequential series, the form of leadership hypothesis evolution illustrated here does not firmly do
so. The primary basis is that old lines of idea on headship have happened in the moderately short
duration and several of them have arisen happen and collapsed concurrently (Mango, 2018).
Therefore, in the present form, there is no credit of the days or times when the several periods
happened, only gratitude of their comparative sequence in the advancement of headship
hypothesis. Every advanced age symbolizes the superior state of enhancement in headship
process than the previous period. The significant headship era comprises of personality era that
consists of the Period of Great Man along with Trait Era (Sanders, 2015). The other age is
Influence eras that include of power relations period and persuasion period. The different era
consists of situation, contingency, culture, transformational, anti-leadership, and transactional
age.
Personality era