Conflict Management in an Interview: Evaluation and Recommendations
Added on 2022-11-07
12 Pages2665 Words463 Views
|
|
|
Running head : THINKING STYLES, NEGOTIATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
THINKING STYLES, NEGOTIATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
Name of the student
Name of the University
Author’s note
THINKING STYLES, NEGOTIATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
Name of the student
Name of the University
Author’s note
THINKING STYLES, NEGOTIATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT1
Executive Summary
The main aim of the report is to explain the consequences during the phase of
interview and identify some of the resolution techniques that could have been adopted by
both the participants to reduce the conflict. This report mainly focus on the threatened that
both the participants are going through and the conflict that arise during the interview.
Several conflict issues are identified during the interview and it has found that both the
participants are aggressive during the conversation. Their body language seems that both of
them are angry and threatened to each other view.
Executive Summary
The main aim of the report is to explain the consequences during the phase of
interview and identify some of the resolution techniques that could have been adopted by
both the participants to reduce the conflict. This report mainly focus on the threatened that
both the participants are going through and the conflict that arise during the interview.
Several conflict issues are identified during the interview and it has found that both the
participants are aggressive during the conversation. Their body language seems that both of
them are angry and threatened to each other view.
THINKING STYLES, NEGOTIATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT2
Table of Contents
Conflict Management Evaluation..............................................................................................3
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Transcript analysis.....................................................................................................................3
Purpose identification.............................................................................................................3
Storytelling.............................................................................................................................4
Transcript analysis under threat.............................................................................................5
Opinions versus facts.............................................................................................................6
Recommendations......................................................................................................................7
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................7
References..................................................................................................................................9
Table of Contents
Conflict Management Evaluation..............................................................................................3
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Transcript analysis.....................................................................................................................3
Purpose identification.............................................................................................................3
Storytelling.............................................................................................................................4
Transcript analysis under threat.............................................................................................5
Opinions versus facts.............................................................................................................6
Recommendations......................................................................................................................7
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................7
References..................................................................................................................................9
THINKING STYLES, NEGOTIATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT3
Conflict Management Evaluation
Introduction
The case study is all about an interview, where Russell Brand is an interviewee who
came for newspaper editor job position. This interview was not smooth as it was expected
due to some consequences in the process of interview. This issue was mainly due to the
question for political magazine. The transcript discussed about the characteristics of Russell
and Jeremy, the way they both presented in that interview (Chen 2012). The interview mainly
focused on conflict management as the interviewee and interviewer were inappropriate for
this interview process. The interviewer must adopt some etiquette such as the behaviour that
must be flexed with emotional understanding, patience, managerial understanding,
psychological stability and many more. The interviewee must be capable enough to perform
the job role for that position that he is going to appointed. The conflict can arise for many
reasons, this must be solved in right time with right measures and by right person (Coleman
2014). The structure of the paper have three parts: in this paper, the first part of the paper
discusses about the purpose of each participant in this interview at the beginning of the
interview. The second part discusses about the participant experiences and their behaviour.
The third part describes about the conflicts and threatening issues which aroused in the
interview process. The fourth part describes about the choice of opinion or fact (Dunne
2016). The purpose of this paper is to solve the conflict that arouses in an interview and in
workplace. The conflict management helps to solve the conflicts in an effective manner.
Transcript analysis
Purpose identification
The interview conducted is a BBC News night interview, and the Jeremy Paxman is
the interviewer, and Russell Brand is the interviewee participating in this interview. At the
Conflict Management Evaluation
Introduction
The case study is all about an interview, where Russell Brand is an interviewee who
came for newspaper editor job position. This interview was not smooth as it was expected
due to some consequences in the process of interview. This issue was mainly due to the
question for political magazine. The transcript discussed about the characteristics of Russell
and Jeremy, the way they both presented in that interview (Chen 2012). The interview mainly
focused on conflict management as the interviewee and interviewer were inappropriate for
this interview process. The interviewer must adopt some etiquette such as the behaviour that
must be flexed with emotional understanding, patience, managerial understanding,
psychological stability and many more. The interviewee must be capable enough to perform
the job role for that position that he is going to appointed. The conflict can arise for many
reasons, this must be solved in right time with right measures and by right person (Coleman
2014). The structure of the paper have three parts: in this paper, the first part of the paper
discusses about the purpose of each participant in this interview at the beginning of the
interview. The second part discusses about the participant experiences and their behaviour.
The third part describes about the conflicts and threatening issues which aroused in the
interview process. The fourth part describes about the choice of opinion or fact (Dunne
2016). The purpose of this paper is to solve the conflict that arouses in an interview and in
workplace. The conflict management helps to solve the conflicts in an effective manner.
Transcript analysis
Purpose identification
The interview conducted is a BBC News night interview, and the Jeremy Paxman is
the interviewer, and Russell Brand is the interviewee participating in this interview. At the
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents