Emergence of Third World Concept and Developmental Theories

The assignment provided examines the emergence of the third world concept and its influence on developmental theories. It delves into the historical context of the modernization theory, the critique by the post-development theory, and the adoption of different development models for various countries. The document also discusses the United Nations' Sustainable Developmental Goals and the Paris Agreement, highlighting the challenges in implementing global agreements. Overall, it provides an in-depth analysis of the complexities surrounding development theories and their application in the third world context.

Running head: THIRD WORLDISM
THIRD WORLDISM
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author note

THIRD WORLDISM1
Topic
Various impacts the concept of “Third-Worldism” has on the theory of development across the
Globe.
Thesis Statement
The thesis statement for this essay is, the theory of Third-Worldism has a direct
impact on development theory.
Discussion
Statement
The term developmental theory denotes to those theories that have been formulated in
order to develop the third world nations, or the nations that are still under developed. Therefore,
the primary need of a developmental theory is that it must fulfill the criterion of inducing
development into the third world countries.
Explanation.
During the cold war the world was literally divided into two separate groups. The cold
war was going on among two countries, the Liberal USA and the Communist Soviet Union or
USSR, and most of the countries throughout the world were supporting either of these two
powers Queen (Elizabeth, 2015). However, there were many countries that did not take part in
such grouping and were known as the third world countries. It is important to note that these
third world countries have a common feature, that is they all were in the category of developing
nations or under developed nations, none of the countries that belonged to the developed
category were in the group which did not support any of these two powers.

THIRD WORLDISM2
After the cold war was over and the world saw the much needed cooperation of various
countries to assist each other in the process of development, there was a discussion among the
developed nations about various processes in which the “third world countries” can be assisted in
their endeavor of development (Goldmann, Hannerz & Westin, 2012). This the researchers from
various countries started drawing the developmental theories. However, trends showed that the
theories that were devised during the beginning phase were gradually losing importance in the
later days when new theories were formulated into that effect.
Among the various early theories for development one of the most important theories is
the Walt Whitman Rostow’s modernization theory of 1960 (Conrad, 2012).. This theory mainly
had five different stages of development, the first being the “Traditional society, preconditions
for take-off, Take off, Drive to maturity and Age of high mass consumption”. The process of
development which needs to be initiated in the third world countries needs to be theorized and
then executed by the international community in a unified manner, otherwise the objective of an
overall sustainable development of all the countries may not be achieved.
The theories that were developed in the subsequent period mainly emphasized upon the
fact that singular theories may not be viable for all nations to be followed as there are much
cultural, social, political and historical differences among all the countries throughout the world.
Therefore, there was a need for developing dynamic processes that would fit into the situations
of various countries to accommodate the different nature of the various countries. The
Dependency theory had refuted the modernization theory which was mentioned previously on
the logic that the modernization theory mentions some stages, however these stages may not be
applicable for all the countries, and there are different needs for different countries (Bull & Bøås,
2012). The dependency theorists have explained that the stages of development in the various

THIRD WORLDISM3
countries are to be measured differently according to the nature of each countries and that the
development cannot be measured uniformly for each of the countries. The theories that may be
applied in the Western countries which are already developed cannot be utilized in the third
world developing countries. Many of the theorists claim that the developed nations in many
cases exploit the third world countries in terms of labor, or natural resources. It is seen all over
the world that the companies in the western countries use the cheap labor force in the third world
countries to manufacture their products. Matthews (2017) stated this theory helped in
establishing a clear “reassessment” of the measures to be taken by the agents of developments to
bring the necessary changes in the theories of development to match the criteria of the third
world developing countries. However, by proper study it can be understood that both the theories
can be utilized in two distinctive cases of development. The modernization theory can be utilized
in the case of inducing further development in the developed nations, and the dependency theory
furnishes the case of development in the third world countries which are still in the phase of
development or under development. These countries are dependent on the 1st world countries, or
developed countries in order to meet their requirement of development. The aids provided by the
international agencies like United Nations, or the World Bank also come with the assistance of
the developed countries which are financially stable.
Statement
The third world countries have not agreed with the ideals of “development” put forward
by the economically stable “first world countries” of the West. The ideals of development in one
country may not be suitable for another country in another economic and social setting.
Explanation

THIRD WORLDISM4
The Second World War created the stage for international cooperation to begin on a
serious level. Human beings understood the need of a comprehensive system of cooperation that
would prevent such massacre in the future and a sustainable development progress for all the
countries around the globe can be achieved. In that purpose the United Nations was created to
bring the efforts of the unified development into one uniform pattern. The membership of the
united nations general assembly was open for all, however the membership of the security
council was limited to a few number of developed and powerful countries that were influential
throughout the globe. Henceforth, indications were found that the case of development for the
already developed and influential countries were argued for in a high pitch tone, however the
voice of the under developed countries of the third world was not properly represented in the
United Nations. This resulted in the formation of various organizations which had only third
world members. These organizations were aimed at resolving the problems that were
encountered in the United Nations, the major of which was ignorance from the developed
countries. These organizations were local organizations aimed at initiating development and
cooperation among the third world countries. Examples are BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China,
and South Africa), SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) (Keukeleire &
Hooijmaaijers, 2014).
McArthur and Werker (2016) rightly noted that these organizations that were aimed at
solution of various problems among the third world countries, and the trend mainly started after
the formation of United Nations. The countries which were still in the stage of developmental
needs, and in the countries where the human developmental index was still low these countries
understood the need of establishing organizations that will catalyze the process of mutual
cooperation among such countries. The “development” process of the developed nations also

THIRD WORLDISM5
comprised of unsustainable practices that posed threat to the environment, and hence the
underdeveloped nations who were not responsible for such environmental damages also has
taken up the responsibility of executing correctional measures. Example is that the developed
nations contributes the most to the process of global warming, however according to the Paris
agreement, all the countries have to take equal responsibilities in undoing the damages caused.
Industrialization is the primary measurement of how much developed a nation is.
Industrialization contributes in making a country better in terms of economy, technology and life
style. The countries where the industrialization ratio is less, is to be globally considered as
countries which are underdeveloped. However, this definition of development may not be true as
a whole, as more industrialization would not necessarily mean that the wealth distribution is even
across segments of the population, or everyone is deriving equal benefits from the industrial
development. Apart from that unsustainable industrial practices also may not be considered as
overall development.
Statement
The two contrasting ideas of developmental theory are in synchronization with the
ideologies of “Liberalism” and “Marxism”. The idea of Liberalism is articulated by Adam Smith,
who has in details discussed about how this theory would catalyze development in the third
world countries. The Marxian theory on the other hand takes a completely opposite approach.
This difference in ideology has been reflected in “third worldism”, and deviation of approach.
Explanation
Various political thoughts throughout the world have different ways of explaining and
analyzing the idea of development. The Marxian developmental theory is different from the

THIRD WORLDISM6
developmental theory of Liberalist view. Adam Smith’s political ideology was based upon the
ideas of liberalism, which emphasized upon free market and lesser governmental intervention in
the market and economic activities (Oslington, 2012). The idea of liberalism is just the opposite
of Marxian explanation of economy and development. An economically strong nation according
to Adam Smith would be dependent on the division of labor force within the economy. Going on
with the views of Liberalism Adam Smith strongly believed that when a market is free from
governmental control (presence of minimum governmental control in areas where it is needed),
and where healthy economic competition prevails along with ability of individuals to hold
private property as they may wish, that economy will succeed in developing. The healthy
competition and free market will enable the entities to endeavor in maximizing their wealth
according to their capability this will lead to an economic stable country as a whole where new
business and employment opportunities will open up (Von Mises, 2012).
On the other hand, the Marxian philosophy is just the opposite to this ideology, and it
gives emphasis on state control on economic activities, and resources which will enable the
government in including all sections of the population in taking part in the economy, this will
ensure a better equal division of wealth among the people (Pashukanis, 2017). The public
ownership of property according to Karl Marx gives rise to accumulation of resources in the
powerful sections of the society which he calls as “haves”, and they exploit the weaker section of
the society whom he calls “have nots” (Negishi, 2014).
Therefore, by the study of both of these theories it is evident that both of these theories
indicate two different perceptions of development, and the two different theories define
development very differently. During the Cold War the world was divided into two groups, one
headed by the Communist USSR which believed in the Marxian model of development, and one

THIRD WORLDISM7
group headed by the liberal USA. So the countries which backed each other these powers were
also divided along their ideology. The groups hence formed were one communist group of nation
and one liberal group of nations, who were called “capitalist” by the USSR group. Post the Cold
War the developmental model adopted by the third world countries were inspired by these
developmental ideologies and theories. China was a communist country and it established the
Marxian system of development, and India on the other hand, under Prime Minister Jawaharlal
Nehru adopted a mixed economic policy where components of both the Marxian system of
development and the Liberal theory were adopted according to need. The railway lines and
partially the health and educational services were under the government control, whereas the
banks were privatized in the beginning phase.
Statement
Contemporary theories of viable development and activities like “Millennial
Development Goals (MDGs)” formulated by the United Nations are condemned for being
enforced upon third world nations.
Justification
The United Nations has proposed the Sustainable Developmental Goals which has the
objective of achieving development in a sustainable manner which could be implemented across
the globe without affecting the environment. The environmental pollution and global warming
was proposed to be controlled by the Paris Agreement, under the United Nations Framework for
Climate Change (Savaresi, 2016). However, the differences of opinions among the various
countries in performing the responsibilities has raised a question about how much feasible it is to
take all the countries of the world to act towards achieving the same goals.

THIRD WORLDISM8
The United States recently pulled out of the Paris Agreement on the ground that the
responsibilities which were imposed upon the country under the provisions of this agreement
were unacceptable and these are harming the economy of the country.
Conclusion
Therefore, it is understandable by understanding the above paragraphs that the emergence
of third world concept changed the course of developmental theories and discussions. New
theories were devised and many new organizations were formed which were working towards
achievement of the objectives of development. The third world countries often did not accept the
notion of development according to the developed nations. It is evident that there must be
different developmental models for different countries and the process must be customized
according to the need of the situation.

THIRD WORLDISM9
Reference:
Bull, B., & Bøås, M. (2012). Between Ruptures and Continuity: Modernisation, Dependency and
the Evolution of Development Theory. Forum for Development Studies, 39(3), 319–336.
doi:10.1080/08039410.2012.688860
Conrad, S. (2012). ‘The Colonial Ties Are Liquidated’: Modernization Theory, Post-War Japan
and the Global Cold War. Past & Present, 216(1), 181-214.
Goldmann, K., Hannerz, U., & Westin, C. (2012). Introduction: Nationalism and
internationalism in the post-Cold War era. In Nationalism and Internationalism in the
Post-Cold War Era(pp. 13-33). Routledge.
Keukeleire, S., & Hooijmaaijers, B. (2014). The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances
and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia‐Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for
the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market
Studies, 52(3), 582-599.
Matthews, S. (2017). Colonised minds? Post-development theory and the desirability of
development in Africa. Third World Quarterly, 38(12), 2650–2663.
doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1279540
McArthur, J. W., & Werker, E. (2016). Developing countries and international organizations:
Introduction to the special issue.
Negishi, T. (2014). History of economic theory (Vol. 26). Elsevier.
Oslington, P. (2012). God and the market: Adam Smith’s invisible hand. Journal of Business
Ethics, 108(4), 429-438.
Pashukanis, E. (2017). The general theory of law and Marxism. Routledge.

THIRD WORLDISM10
Queen Elizabeth, I. I. (2015). Cold War Era. Postwar America: An Encyclopedia of Social,
Political, Cultural, and Economic History, 191.
Savaresi, A. (2016). The Paris Agreement: a new beginning?. Journal of Energy & Natural
Resources Law, 34(1), 16-26.
Von Mises, L. (2012). Liberalism. Important Books.