Tolerance Training Option Or Differential Negative Reinforcement Of All Other Behaviors

Tolerance Training Option
Or Differential Negative
Reinforcement Of All Other
Behaviors

Table of Contents
Differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviour (DRI)..........................................................1
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................4

Differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviour (DRI)
DRI is a weakening procedure completely operates with accordance on reinforcement. The
reinforced behaviour is incompatible in both the senses that is desirably incompatible as well as
topographically incompatible (Fishe and et. al., 2019). As reinforced behaviour is not the target
one and the rationale is that an individual in any way cannot be engaged in two incompatible
behaviours altogether. One behaviour if got strengthened then another must have been observed
to have weakened. The procedure of DRI can be generally utilised to intervene with a child who
does not behave properly or used to remain out of his seat in the classroom. The behaviour that
found to be incompatible with roaming behaviour of the child is that of being seated. The
advantage of DRI is that it focusses on positive practices, and not elimination of unwanted
behaviour. This is the reason that it sometimes referred as a constructional approach to
weakening behaviour. One of the major challenges with DRI that it is difficult to search for a
behaviour which is appropriate and that is incompatible with reference to topography with the
target behaviour. Another potential challenge observed is inability of an individual to involve in
behaviour which is incompatible for whole time they would involve normally in the target
behaviour (Kunnavatana and et. al., 2018). This complies with 100% rule. Another example is
reinforcement on playing piano which might be used to treat preschool child who have the
tendency to beat other children. But it needs to be considered that the children could not be
expected to play the piano the whole time even when attend in preschool.
Many researchers have conducted the research on evaluation of association of behaviour
principles related to the acceptability of treatment of ratings. Many participants have selected
which included 57 directive care staff members. To all the participants, a case description was
presented along with many manipulations from low to severe level of self-injurious behaviour.
Although overcorrection processes have been used commonly with the individuals suffering with
mental problem on level of institution. These processes can be employed in the treatment of case
of emotional disturbances, autism, disorders related to behaviour in a variety of settings.
Numerous studies observed to be focused on children, but studies have not ignored the
opportunity of working and studying with adults. Bechtel and Foxx classified maladaptive
behaviour and conducted their studies which tends to treat those cases under studies by using
technique of overcorrection. And duet researcher categorises the aggressive-disruptive
behaviours, toileting behaviours, self-injurious behaviours, self-stimulatory behaviours,
1