Trade Policy and Environment

This article discusses the impact of trade policy on the environment and the need for a strict trade policy to regulate environmental harms. It also highlights the positive and negative effects of trade on the environment. The article explores the relationship between trade and the environment, the impact of trade on greenhouse gas emissions, and the role of international environmental agreements. It also discusses the impact of trade on economic growth and the need for sustainable environmental development. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for a consistent trade policy that protects the environment.

Running head: TRADE POLICY AND ENVIRONMENT
Trade Policy and Environment
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1TRADE POLICY AND ENVIRONMENT
It is a legal issue to determine whether environmental issues should be addressed in
the trade policy. Trade and production has an obvious impact on the environment and most of
them negatively impacts the environment. In Canada the increasing business opportunities are
facing the issues related to the impact of trade in the environment. Therefore, trade policies
should be drafted in such a way that it protects the environment. In order to protect the
environment from the damages of trades, a strict trade policy regulating the environmental
harms should be maintained to ensure the protection of the environment. Such a policy can
prove to be beneficiary for the environment as well as the mankind.
In modern times, the impact of trade activities over the environment has become a
serious concern. The trade economists have observed that trade opening affects the
environment (Panayotou, 2016) in the countries like Canada where business opportunities are
high. Trade liberalisation has impacted the environment by the scale, techniques and
composition of trade. A conceptual framework was created and applied in the North
American Free Trade Agreement, which helps in study the link between trade activities and
environmental change (Low, 2016). Trade opening affects greenhouse gas emission as it
involves energy use, which eventually leads to more greenhouse gas emission. However,
trade opening may result in innovation of some techniques to improve energy efficiency.
New techniques are introduced to regulate and control the greenhouse gas emission. Lastly,
composition effect of trade liberalisation would result in less greenhouse gas emission where
the sectors which are expending are likely produce greenhouse gas than those contracting
sectors. In this aspect, the reformulation of Gasoline Rule needs to be highlighted. Under the
US Clean Air Act, the gasoline rule, regulates the emission effects of gasoline, with an
objective to reduce the air pollution. It creates a figure for gasoline, using various methods
for imported and domestic gasoline. It was found that the Gasoline Rule was more

2TRADE POLICY AND ENVIRONMENT
favourable to the domestic gasoline than the imported gasoline violating the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
On the other hand, trade has resulted into economic growth of countries and thus
helping them to promote environmental up gradation. The continued growth of economy has
helped in adopting the needful measures to take sustainable environmental development
(Ciesin.org. 2018). The developed countries are willing to pay for improving the environmental
quality.
International environmental agreements, to which Canada is a party, address the
international environmental problems and applies the polluter-pays-principle as over the
world. Despite that, international environmental agreements are difficult to sustain. It has
been observed that lower priorities has been given to some countries to solve an
environmental problem than the other countries for different risk attitudes and preferences
(Copeland & Taylor, 2013). In fact, countries sometimes disagree with the scientific evidence
of environmental issues as it is observed in the recent climate change discussion. The per
capita differences in countries implies a different evaluation of environment irrespective of
identical risk attitudes and preferences.
There are many countries that grow or produce products for domestic sale and use
purpose as well as for the purpose of exporting. While growing cotton has led farmers and
producers to increase their profitability and the countries to gain an unexpected economic
revenue, it has caused some serious environmental damages. Therefore, it is extremely
required to adopt an efficient trade practice to avoid land degradation and soil erosion.
Additionally the cross border trade activities has sometimes caused to certain environmental
damages that cannot be recovered. Trade accidents occur as a part of the trade activities,
which harms the environment in a serious way. For example, in the year 2010, the remarkable

3TRADE POLICY AND ENVIRONMENT
environmental disaster happened that is known as the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. An
oilrig, known as the Deep Water Horizon exploded and continued to burn for two days and
sunk in the Gulf of Mexico. The damages which arise out of it cannot be estimated or
recovered.
At the same time, the environmental concern and trade policy cannot be connected
directly to improve the environmental condition and enhance the protection. The strict
environment standards provided by the government are not always fair to the farmers as they
are not able to bear the burden to comply with the standards. The imposition of taxes and
duties on imports and exports have become so stringent that the lower economic group are
left to suffer. The environmental protection costs differ in different countries though the
required environmental regulatory treatment is almost the same in every countries (Aklin,
2016). Eventually the General agreement on Tariffs and Trade and WTO agreement does not
contain all the detailed provisions of the relationship of the trade and environment (Wto.org.
2018). The Tuna-Dolphin case was one of the famous case where an embargo was imposed
on the import of the Tuna fish caught with the use of such a fishing techniques that
endangered the lives of dolphins. A ban was imposed by USA upon such fishing methods.
More than 200 Multilateral Environment Agreements (MEAs) have been signed since the
first UN conference pertaining to environment in 1972. Several treaties and agreements like
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) have been recognised
universally while the others have been accepted in some regions and smaller group of
countries for its specifications. These MEAs include various trade measures in their
guidelines, which strives to direct the member states to adopt precautionary measure to
safeguard the environment that involves the flora and fauna of a region. Regulating bodies
are making these socially progressive agreements and conventions popular in global scenario
when it comes to framing policy pertaining to the environment. However, this might have a

4TRADE POLICY AND ENVIRONMENT
conflict with the trade rules of the WTO (Morin, Pauwelyn, & Hollway, 2017). The MEAs
include different types of restrictions on trade and for making trade policies keeping
environmental concerns in mind. Restrictions like banning the trade of particular substance
that is polluting the environment. MEAs may also require incorporation of measures that may
have a direct or indirect impact on trade, like changes on taxes, requirement of prior consent
to carry out certain operations, variation in labelling, etcetera. While some MEAs are made
particularly for regulating the trade practices of certain commodities of a region, like the
Convention on Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) controls the specific trades that
require the movement of flora and fauna that are on the verge of extinction. Restrictions in
disguise of penalties and punishments are also imposed by way of these MEAs. Treaties,
agreements and conventions use trade restriction as an instrument to back their intentions and
purpose to protect the environment. Like, the Montreal Protocol was signed in relation to the
issues of ozone layer depletion, which required restrictive use of some chemical substances
that was harmful for Stratosphere. By way of this treaty, the ‘non-parties’ to the protocol
were also made to oblige the guidelines (Brack, 2017). Such stringent authority of the MEAs
made it popular for its ability to address the particular environmental harms, to promote
compliance and its mission to encourage participation of more countries to battle
environmental issues.
As a part of the fact, it can be argued that the biggest environmental benefit for trades
are that, it concentrates on polluting activities by permitting pollution havens, in those area
where least harm is caused. Trade activities leads to race to the bottom with regards to the
environmental regulatory policies as the firms are likely to cut expenses in order to compete
with the foreign market (Ahmed, Shahbaz, & Kyophilavong, 2016). Growths in income, has
helped the countries like Canada to combat with the environmental problems. However it
indirectly leads to endanger or extinction of various species and animals.

5TRADE POLICY AND ENVIRONMENT
It can be concluded by observing the positive and negative impacts of the trade in the
environment that it has several benefits offset by other harms to the world. Following the
current environmental changes, sustainable care should be taken through the trade policy,
making the trade and environment protection to be consistent with each other. The
environmental issues may arise in the importing countries, exporting countries or at the
supply level. There are obviously some positive effects of trade on environment. As trade
may promote effective allocation of resources throughout the world and contribute to enhance
the standard of living of the people and the environment by expanding the production. Trade
can have a positive effect on the environment by implementing an effective policy reduce
insufficient use of the resources. Additionally, trade generates financial resources that might
be necessary for managing the environmental damages. Whereas, in the absence of an
appropriate environmental policy, there may be negative effects on the environment that are
related with trade in terms of increased transport, and international trading of hazardous
substances. In that cases, even indirect effects can result from a growth in the use of natural
resources, pollutants emissions and wastes related with the expanding economic activities. In
addition to this, environmental degradation can be resulted from trade activities by
weakening some economic activities. Likewise, there are some environmental policy
measures, for example, eco-labelling and recycling requirements that have trade-restrictive
effects. However, both are interdependent and should be given the appropriate attention to
avoid any future danger to the world.

6TRADE POLICY AND ENVIRONMENT
References
Ahmed, K., Shahbaz, M., & Kyophilavong, P. (2016). Revisiting the emissions-energy-trade
nexus: evidence from the newly industrializing countries. Environmental Science and
Pollution Research, 23(8), 7676-7691.
Aklin, M. (2016). Re-exploring the trade and environment nexus through the diffusion of
pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 64(4), 663-682.
Brack, D. (2017). International trade and the Montreal Protocol. Routledge.
Ciesin.org. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.ciesin.org/docs/008-067/chpt1.html
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2013). Trade and the environment: Theory and evidence.
Princeton University Press.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
Low, P. (2016). International trade and the environment. UNISIA, (30), 95-99.
Morin, J. F., Pauwelyn, J., & Hollway, J. (2017). The trade regime as a complex adaptive
system: exploration and exploitation of environmental norms in trade
agreements. Journal of International Economic Law, 20(2), 365-390.
Panayotou, T. (2016). Economic growth and the environment. The environment in
anthropology, 140-148.
US Clean Air Act
Wto.org. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_e.htm