logo

Life Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Incineration Waste-to-Energy Technologies

Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies: Theoretical analysis and case study of commercial plants

5 Pages652 Words434 Views
   

Added on  2023-04-22

About This Document

This article compares pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies based on life cycle assessment (LCA) and case studies of commercial plants. The study concludes that gasification and pyrolysis have better environmental performance than incineration, but modern incineration is more valuable due to its flu gas cleaning effectiveness, ash recycling, and CHP cycle usage. The article also highlights the importance of waste quality, energy efficiency, and efficient residues management for achieving sustainability.

Life Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Incineration Waste-to-Energy Technologies

Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies: Theoretical analysis and case study of commercial plants

   Added on 2023-04-22

ShareRelated Documents
1
ARTICLE SUMMARY
By
Name
Instructors’/Professor’s Name
College/University
Course Number
Street
Date
Life Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Incineration Waste-to-Energy Technologies_1
2
The article is majorly concerned with the transition of Municipal solid waste, gasification and
pyrolysis towards more sustainable energy advancement, sustainable waste simulation to energy
option (WtE). Due to rare comprehensive comparisons of the prevailing technologies of WtE,
this study focuses on LCA (Life cycle Assessment) basing on two data sets; theoretical analysis
as well as case studies comprising large scale commercial plants. Taking theoretical analysis, the
utilized data are obtained from industrial practices, standards, peer-reviewed literatures as well as
recent search reports. Several processes including thermal conversion for instance; gasification
and incineration, and energy utilization that is internal combustion engine, gas turbine as well as
steam cycl) and emissions at the stack are therefore modelled (Dong et al., 2018).
Theoretical analysis therefore poses a conclusion that, on comparing with incineration;
gasification and pyrolysis stand the likelihood of having a better performance environmentally
performance evidenced by two thrilling benefits like process emissions reduced as well as
extensive increase in recovered amount of energy. In addition, pyrolysis and gasification lower
the environmental impacts of photochemical ozone formation (POF), terrestrial eutrophication
(TE), human toxicity via air (HTa) and ecotoxicity via solid (ETs) but increase the effects of
global warming (GW) and human toxicity via solid (HTs). Gasification systems show lower
environmental impact than pyrolysis systems, for a direct comparison of various WtE processes.
Some analyses are shown on the graphs (Dong et al., 2018).
Life Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Incineration Waste-to-Energy Technologies_2

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
The Process of Waste to Energy Conversion Assignment 2022
|6
|1106
|25

Management of Hazardous Household Waste Assignment 2022
|27
|6370
|17