Transportation Engineering

This project report focuses on improving walkability conditions and evaluating pedestrian infrastructure in transportation engineering. It discusses the importance of walkability, advantages of better walkability, and the challenges faced in urban areas. The report also provides a methodology for evaluating walkability and suggests design considerations for enhancing walkability. The case study of the central estate in London is used to illustrate the issues and propose remedies. Overall, the report aims to promote a pedestrian-friendly transportation system.

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
By Name
Course
Instructor
Institution
Location
Date

Abstract
The estates are ordinarily implied for the general population yet the patterns in the advancement
in the segment of the development have organized vehicles over the pedestrians. Indeed, even
because of the strategies of the assessment on the vehicle those capacities to defeat the person on
foot from the street space. In this project report, the help is given to the improvement of the
framework for the genuine proprietors of the region who are really the general population. There
is an endeavor to give the plan towards the arrangement of the required parameters that enhance
the walkability conditions as a rule. The paper has really considered the approaches level in
accomplishing the walkability conditions.

Contents
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................2
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................3
Background..............................................................................................................................................3
Should the estate be left for the vehicles or people?..............................................................................5
Methodology...............................................................................................................................................5
Evaluation of the walkability...................................................................................................................6
The conditions of the pedestrian infrastructure in London Central Estate..........................................7
Consideration of the design towards walkability...............................................................................10
REMEDIES..........................................................................................................................................14
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................21
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................................23
APPENDIX..................................................................................................................................................25
Introduction
Background
The core objective of the piece of the literature is to assist in the provision of the appraisal for the
issues of the transportation and traffic related matters. The development proposal extends to the
undertaking of the multi-modal trip generation and evaluation of the impact while proposing the

steps for the solutions. This has been done in a way that recognizes the regional. Local, national
policies and guidelines for the planning process. In any urban set up, the approach of the
walkability is considered very important idea in terms of the economics. Normally it is regarded
as a proportion of how perfect an area is inviting for the pedestrian (Rajé 2017). There are
several advantages of walkability starting from natural, safety and even monetary ones. Better
walkability has shown various individuals likewise; arrange benefits, for instance, open
entryways for extended social association, diminished mistakes, extended network sense and
obligation.
A champion among the most fundamental favorable circumstances of walkability is the reduction
of the vehicle accidents from the system. Thusly 'carbon releases' can be diminished if more
people choose to walk. Extended walkability has moreover been found to have various money
related focal points both to individuals and to general society with extended profitability of land
usage including accessibility, extended decency, transportation cost speculation reserves,
monetary preferences from upgraded general safety and catalyzes budgetary improvement.
In the nations that have created this system like for the instances of the India, there is an
approach to have most of the general population walk or utilize open arrangement of the
transportation. The greater part of the urban communities has been empowering the standard or
the use of the mass rapid transit system (MRTS).Such instruments ordinarily energizes the
development of the person on foot (Watson 2012). In actuality, what is really found in the zone
under the examination is the fast development of the quantity of the vehicles out and about,
recommendations being given to the development of the flyovers and furthermore the extension
of the streets which really empowers an ever increasing number of vehicles some of the time to

the detriment of the trails, person on foot safety and accommodation. These exercises have
disheartened the pedestrian movement.
Should the estate be left for the vehicles or people?
The organization of TransEng Ltd is before long going to embrace the utilization of the
arrangement of MRTS. This will be done in endeavor to give fitting exhortation to the designer
at the central estate of London. The appropriation of this framework isn't just going to facilitate
the movement or flow of the traffic on the streets yet it is likewise going to improve the
movement of the pedestrian thereby reducing the congestion.
All the workers that apply the standards of the MRTs at a specific purpose of their outing would
be treated as the people on foot. The desire in this way is an enormous increment in the stream at
the hubs of the MRTS.The productivity of the MRTS isn't just controlled by the individual
execution however as a framework for the user (Hine and Mitchell 2017). Fiscally arrive regard
is a segment of walkability list; along these lines it needs to expect an important activity in
making urban money related angles. A business area with extra walkable character gets higher
arrangements. Since headway of urban networks people favored living closer to downtown
regions, work centers or activities of consistently needs. Walkable streets have reliably been a
crucial bit of dynamic space in homes and other private spots. Positive qualities are added to
living inside straightforward walking separation. In any case, shockingly walking is unmeasured
and in addition rejected while traffic organizing.
Methodology
This specific report draws some of the reasonable and scholastic rules. Subsequently, the
evaluation has relied upon both the work area think about and the field work. Note that this

evaluation may a bit much be complete and consequently the exclusion of explicit places, space
or highlights may not infer that they are of little intrigue.
Evaluation of the walkability
Assessment of the walkability is extremely testing and regularly requires thought of number of
intellectual components. The file of the walkability comprises of three segments including safety,
comfort and the security (Li, Zhu, Peng, Liu, Wang and Bryce 2014). The level of the help from
the strategies of the legislature can be considered too.
Variables, components and indicators for walkability evaluation
The evaluation of the walkability is typically done utilizing a lot of strategies. Anyway the
strolling review is the most usually utilized technique in the assessment. The review utilizes the
utilization of the Pedestrian Environment Review System that has discovered its utilization
broadly in the UK.
Parameters table

The pointers or the indicators that have been shown close by the factors are really burdened with
the part of the accessibility as the need measure which aids the appraisal of the walkability list.
The walkability conditions in the central estate London under the examination which is the
home at the Central London have been learned at the dimension thought about experience
because of the deficient information and furthermore the time requirements constraints.
The conditions of the pedestrian infrastructure in London Central Estate
The person on foot is really the casualties of the present pattern of the vehicular driven
advancement of the framework. As indicated by the information accessible, the accidents
guarantee in excess of 30 experiences each year in the estate. Central London is also following
similar traffic upgrades. From this time forward it is vital to sort out focus on making traffic
system for safe advancement of real holder of city: the overall public or individuals by walking
and not the vehicles.

The area is growing rapidly and is depended upon to accomplish a population of 400 thousand by
2025. Starting at now street lanes are blocked and still it is selecting generous number of vehicles
reliably. To oblige these vehicles the estate is making vehicular driven structure; showing
groupings of flyovers, outer ring road and street expanding program, etc. This enhancement
procedure in surge hour gridlock and transportation structure has obscured the people on foot.
This has been as results of:
 Pedestrian framework matters in the region under the investigation (Estate in central)
 Permanent obstacle by the development over the spots viewed as walkways
 Lack of the metros and FOB that really powers the people on foot to cross the streets
through extremely bustling signs (Tolley and Turton 2014).
 Uncontrolled stopping that are at the walkways prompting the deterrent.
 The endpoint is spontaneous and is accordingly decreasing the successful utilization of
the walkways. This has prompted the dumping of the materials that lead to the check of
the pathways.
 Finally there is check because of the not well structured equipment along the avenues
other than the absence of the obstructions that can be utilized to free the plan.
In every one of these regions it was established that the houses that are in danger of the accidents
because of the contention between the vehicles and the people on foot. The walkways are absent
in the vast majority of the spots while the walkways in alternate spots are really insufficient,
poorly planned or not well kept up.
A portion of these regions additionally, have walkways with business encroachments and
impediments diminishing effective width of walkways. Moreover in view of lacking structure of

leaving vehicles are seen left on pathways along these lines obliging open to stroll on roads.
Walkways at both the movement focuses at Shopping and Conventional focuses are encroached
by hawkers and traders (Urry 2016). All the real individual by walking regions or spaces are
along traffic speed ways while city needs in metros or foot over frameworks for safe individual
by walking development.
In a couple of areas of central London trails are organized at level to road level to give flexibility
of carriage width in the midst of pinnacle hour. Notwithstanding, this has extended accident risks
for the pedestrians (Geels 2012). It has been discovered that if there should lift an event of
central London territory that endlessly mixed with plots, broad institutional plots and walled
townships have extended walking partition by manifolds than the real detachment between two
goals. Overall estate traffic and individual by pedestrian system dampens individual by walking
improvement.
Consideration of the design towards walkability
There are a couple of various approaches to make streets and lanes dynamically walkable. In a
perfect world structure thoughts are to be seen from customers' perspective. In case of Central
estate of London where individuals by walking are starting at now high and would copy with
MRTS, individual by walking ought to have been arranged reasoning about such individual
conduct.
Calculation Approach
Since there is no singular approach to be used for the case of the modal split calculation in the
community of science, there has to be definition of a set of terms. This will definitely represent
an important step in the calculation.

Modal split is defined as the ratio of the different modes of the transport in the total journey
from the starting point commonly referred to as the origin marked as O and the final point
referred to as the destination, D.
Modes of the transport refer to the types of the transport that are utilized in a single journey
from point O-D
\Journey has been regarded as the transport of people including walking with the particular
purpose.
The modes of the transport include walking that is normally taken to be less than 100m
Cycling
Use of the motorbike
Use of Cars
Public Transport(PT).
Calculation of the modal Split is carried out between the two zones of the central in London.

As had been stated before, modal split is actually a ratio of various modes transport in a single.
In order to apply various usage of various modes in a single modes, many approaches must be
applied in the calculation.
The zoning can be achieved by the use of the binaries;
Transport Model
Trip Characteristics/Trip generations.
Travel demand generation
The production takes into account the number of the individual per vehicle. This is equivalent to
the entire population. The attraction that necessitate the movement of the individual within the
estates include the following:
Movement related to sales activities in the commercial places
People moving to different places of work

Children who move to school and back to their residential places.
In the central London estate the area coverage translates to 2500m2 and having total of 1500
residential units.
The commercial and Residential individual trip rates are calculated in reference to the peak
hours.
Hour Commercial
rates
Residential rates
Movement type In Out In Out
Morning Peak
hours(08:00-
10:00).
2.564 0.334 0.101 0.456
Evening peak
hours(17:00-
19:00).
0.325 2.435 0.237 0.159
Operation per
day(07:00-19:00)
13.487 12.456 1.882 2.001
Effects Description
The trip generation rates acquired in this investigation are clearly a result of the effects of
utilization changes that have happened in central London estate. Truth be told, the aggregate
vehicle trip rate is most elevated for family units living in isolated residential and somewhat
lowered for those living in apartment dwellings. This is halfway in opposition to the

circumstance in urban areas in where vehicle trip generation rates as a rule are higher for family
units living in disconnected and semi-disengaged homes. When contrasted with these rates for
family units living in apartment dwellings. This perception is likewise in part in opposition to the
arranging standard given in Urban Planning Guidelines in UK.
The Guidelines recommend high rates of vehicle trips for family units in isolated and semi-
confined residents, and lower rates for families in apartment dwellings. Real reason for this
distinction is likely the difference in way of life in urban regions caused by changes of land use,
whereby an extraordinary level of high and center salary family units and workers are living in
central place; though a larger part low pay families and jobless individuals live in segregated and
semi-disengaged houses. The investigation additionally found the quantity of representatives
what's more; vehicles were higher for family units living in flat residences. This adds to higher
vehicle trip rates for family living in lofts contrasted with those in semidetached what's more,
apartment dwellings. The pattern is uniform for both commercial and residential areas as
illustrated from the table.
Modal Split
Mode AM peak hour
(08:00-09:00)
Total 2-
way
PM peak hour
(17:00-18:00)
Total 2-
way
In Out In Out
Underground 275 114 389 98 293 391
Train 400 116 516 100 427 527
Bus 95 55 150 35 111 146
Taxi 34 60 94 56 47 103
Motorcycle 9 3 12 2 10 12
Car driver 10 8 18 5 11 16
Car passenger 9 3 12 2 10 12
Bicycle 74 20 94 17 77 94

Walk 121 139 260 117 146 263
Total 1027 518 1541 432 1132 1564
Underground
From Table 1, amid the AM top hour, it is assessed that there would be at aggregate of 389 treks
(275 inbound and 114 outbound) utilizing Underground administrations while for the PM top
hour, it is assessed that 391 treks (98 inbound and 293 outbound) would utilize the Underground.
Underground treks would utilize the station(s) within 880m of advancement. Show if these could
be suited utilizing existing stations or new ones will be required
Train
There would be an aggregate of 516 man trips (400 inbound and 116 outbound) amid the AM top
hour (08:00 to 09:00) and 527 man trips (100 inbound and 427 outbound) amid the PM crest
hour (17:00 to 18:00). Are there any trains stations inside 880m of the Development? On the off
chance that so these outings could be appointed to this station.
Buses
There would be an aggregate of 150 man trips (95 inbound and 55 outbound) amid the AM top
hour (08:00 to 09:00) and 146 man trips (35 inbound and 1085 outbound) amid the PM top hour
(17:00 to 18:00). Are there any transport stops inside 440m of the Development? In the event
that so these outings could be doled out to this station.
Vehicles

There would be an aggregate of 124 vehicle trips (53 inbound and 71 outbound) amid the AM
crest hour (08:00 to 09:00) and 131 vehicle trips (63 inbound and 68 outbound) amid the PM
crest hour (17:00 to 18:00). These could be allocated to the significant streets close to the
advancement. Talk about the effects in connection to close-by major road(s), stopping, and so
forth.
Bike
The Development is assessed to produce a normal of 94 cycle trips (74 inbound and 20
outbound) amid the AM top hour and a normal of 94 cycle trips (17 inbound and 77 outbound)
amid the PM top hour. Examine this in connection to existing transport strategies, stopping, and
so forth.
Walking (Pedestrians)
The Development is required to produce 256 extra walk trips (121 inbound and 13 outbound)
amid the AM crest hour and 263 extra walk trips (117 inbound and 146 outbound) amid the PM
top hour. Talk about this in connection to existing transport approaches, and so forth.
REMEDIES
Security and safety
Pedestrian safety design must be the prime objective of individual by walking system. The
pedestrian vehicular conflicts must be avoided. The highlighted errors that need correction
include the following:

• Place to walk is absent from genuine pedestrian zones. These areas should be given walkways,
and with minimum standard structure thoughts. The walkways should avoid any squares,
hindrances and a great deal of level complexity to be obliged content with walking space.
• Barrier free pedestrian establishment setup approach is required for walkway design
contemplating safety for young people, elderly and the impaired.
Safe road crossing establishment is required especially for huge work what's more, business
focal points of city for safe individual by walking improvement. As such endless supply of Zebra
crossing the streets skywalks moreover, metros must be proposed to keep up a key separation
from pedestrian -vehicular conflict.
• If there ought to emerge an event of zebra crossing the vehicles are ought to have control
already stop line as tendency of the estate has been to flood zebra crossing in the midst of
warning measures. Thusly traffic police control is comparatively basic for safe crossing points.
• Rescue islands must be an essential some bit of pedestrian safety if individuals by walking are
made to walk around the zebra crossing center.
• Controlling vehicles and denouncing the drivers isn't the fundamental course as it has been seen
that pedestrian themselves endeavor to cross roads without banner, bouncing over or
experiencing the punctures in central skirt. Along these lines open care what's more;
suburbanite's advantage is in like manner also required. Furthermore the punctures whenever
given must be organized at fitting areas.

• Synchronized traffic hail must be given at huge convergences to vehicular and furthermore
individual by walking advancement close by clock that ensures safe crossing point for all
including crippled, elderly and children (Stein, Draxler, Rolph, Stunder, Cohen and Ngan 2015).
• Street lights with acceptable lighting up along walkways ensure mental security to pedestrians.
• Since most by far of the pedestrian foot zones are close business areas or work centers, fire
security appraisals ought to in like manner be taken under compulsory structure examinations.
Figure 1: Friendly pedestrian approach (Watson 2012)
Convenience and Attractiveness
With up and coming MRTS, a larger piece of pedestrian would be suburbanites or clients. Thusly
transparently locales like work, business additionally, recreational zones, pedestrian zones with
much comforts would be required:
• Provision of basic street system and street furniture must be ensured for the solace of
pedestrian.

• Most of the walkways existing in estate of central London have snags and obstructions because
of promotion hoardings or business encroachment which ought to have been controlled. Course
of street dealers (their Number and region) will give comfort for pedestrian additionally as utilize
existing pedestrian movement.
• Pedestrian very much arranged orchestrating rules must be gotten to give typical shade and
condition without causing obstacle for pedestrians and sufficient trees must be planted.
Assurance of trees must be considered to keep up a key separation from any hindrance in view of
low extensions (Dawson, Searle, and Paterson 2014).
• Maintenance drive of walkways should be much of the time coordinated. This won't simply
ensure safe advancement yet furthermore offer time to laborers additionally, purchasers to
recognize urban condition and view business appear thusly growing deals.
• Urban Esthetics and nuances are all around invigorating in zones with walkable condition.
Since most of the thickly individual by walking domains inside London are in inheritance zone
or old locales, individual by walking establishment design should in like manner consider urban
arrangement, building and social heritage features.

Figure 2: Walkability improvement for pedestrian zones (Watson 2012)
Support from enacted policies
Some of the policies that will be considered relevant in the entire process include the following:
The National policy Frame Work of the year 2012
Achievement of any masterminding endeavor fundamentally requires government plan reinforce.
Passerby organizing rules under, rule for thorough individual by walking workplaces has quite
recently been altered to upgrade walker system in London conditions by National Planning
Policy Framework(2012). Also regional policy of 2016 and Local policy of 2015 have been
utilized to figure Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority for each genuine city. These
principles and courses of action must be grasped to achieve protected and viable touring plan

(Finetti et al 2014). Subsequently, employment of a vehicle coordinator along these lines ends up
basic especially in metropolitan transport orchestrating authorities and considers:
• Setting a legal structure to guarantee suitable to walk around individuals by walking must be
considered to encourage social and esteem stresses in flexibility orchestrating.
• Pedestrian advancement plans should be made available with traffic organizing.
• Traffic headings must be made strict with disciplines to control vehicular and also walker
advancement to ensure security for both. Introducing traffic calming frameworks is required at
setup orchestrate London traffic organizing program, especially at critical individual by walking
hubs.
• Free left turns must have traffic control especially in high pedestrian zones with speed ways. In
UK conditions regularly left turn is for each situation free. This extends the peril for individuals
by walking if skywalks/metros are not given as traffic from one heading is free improvement;
generally a darkened turns. Under such conditions in noteworthy individual by walking regions
totally bystander crossing time must be synchronized inside banner structure.
• Involvement of open to be settled on in essential administration and organizing pedestrian
movement.
Regional policy of 2016
This particular policy has been fronted by the plan of Mayor that proposes:
• Safety surveys and pedestrian security preparing program must be coordinated as often as
possible.

• Policy preparing for open flexibility ought to in like manner examine condition welcoming
methodology.
• Devolution of commitments must be met in all requirements for each seat of work.
• Role of NGOs and open private collaboration, choice of workplaces or headway of
establishment is similarly ought to have been invigorated by supportive besides corporate
regions.
• Various points of reference all over world like California and also Delhi, etc. have given the
idea that extending land use dedicated to transport isn't the response for pushing ahead traffic
conditions yet sharp traffic officials, astute transportations system, mass travel structure and
traffic techniques can expect a legitimate activity in settling metropolitan traffic issues. With a
cutting-edge MRTS suggestion there is a typical addition in footfall at all the MRTS centers. As
such despite recently referenced thoughts, walkability does not simply stick to individual by
walking warm philosophy yet what's more consider suburbanites and purchaser direct.
• Promotion of movement masterminded enhancement close by new urbanism orchestrating will
upgrade walkability conditions and revive existing and also new urban core interests.
Local Policy of 2015
• Compact and high thickness entry enhancement inside MRTS catchment district will help
reduce walking divisions and moreover travel time.
• Appropriate zoning and building headings (control accidents, far, stature, climatic concerns,
etc. ;) can create pleasing physical and visual condition for laborers.

• Connectivity of individual by walking structure to noteworthy beginning and objective regions
must be viewed with respect to leave zones of MRTS stations.
• Locations of routes out if there ought to be an event of underground MRTS stations must be
picked with capable territory express orchestrating by restricting the most outrageous objective
partitions, consequently diminishing as a rule suburbanite strolling.
Uncommon highlights of the structure for the walkability inside the MRTS Area Catchment
Close by the general person on foot structure parameters in the central London estates and the
focuses of the task and now require uncommon passerby foundation.
Specific Lane for Pedestrians
By far most of the activities in exceedingly pedestrianized zones are spoken to by open zone. In
this manner open fragment can share an obligation towards walker advancement additionally. An
expansive part of the all-inclusive community and semi-open region can expect an imperative
employment by offering adversities to making 'totally pedestrianized ways'. This will similarly
resolve the issue of extended walking partition due to gated systems and foundations. Essential
of such totally bystander way is at regular focuses on roundabout, commercial mall, City Hall
and Conventional Centre.
Identifying specific places for parking
All stations must have basic halting anyway critical ceasing or stunned ceasing should be given
at explicit center points which are close significant private portions inside increasingly noticeable
influence an area. Region of huge stopping territories close nearby areas must be close to MRTS
centers (inside 100 m from MRTS station) while at business center points it might be inside 250
m to 500 m enabling walking around MRTS centers thusly offering opportunities to business
establishments.

Establishment of Zones free from vehicles
This can be delivered in old domains of London where people leave their private vehicle on road.
This could be replaced by giving them with united ceasing for the zone. Region of halting will be
spoken to by availability of room and furthermore thought for constraining the best division of
the zone. Roads in these zones can similarly be created as accessible as possible.
Conclusion
Upgrading walkability ensures most clear way to improve decency concerns. World is walking
around urban sensibility and estates specifically. Walkability enhances urbanity, social joint
efforts, organize prosperity and viable condition. It can in like manner settle social and esteem
stresses in flexibility organizing manner (Batty 2013). London can in like manner revive its new
culture dynamic quality by orchestrating social walkable zones, and choosing perfect course of
action for the habitants of the city and its lifestyle. The underlying move towards walkable
London city would be made by removing halting on walkways and utilizing existing system
sought after by giving basic walker establishment and comforts to all other pedestrian zones.
From that point on, keeping up and upgrading pedestrian structure and enabling individuals by
walking could be taken up.
In like manner informational projects must be directed to deliver recognition with walkability.
This should be maintained by assistant changes in legal framework to give social incentive to
pedestrian and perfect to walk around profitable system improvement. Distinctive headway
affiliations need to work in coordination to achieve needed urban condition for pedestrian.
Making such walks at present would make protected, secure and beneficial stage for best in class
MRTS specialists (Anable, Brand, Tran and Eyre 2012). Undertaking for Public Spaces, a non-

advantage relationship in London City, has refined this idea into a saying: 'When you plan urban
zones for vehicles and traffic, you get more automobiles besides, traffic. When you plan urban
networks for people, you get more people'. Today urban coordinators in London need to
reconsider for whom they are planning. An urban module for London urban networks is ought to
have been made to hold our socio-social energy through responsibility of pedestrian conservative
systems.
REFERENCES
Anable, J., Brand, C., Tran, M. and Eyre, N., 2012. Modelling transport energy demand: A
socio-technical approach. Energy policy, 41, pp.125-138.
Batty, M., 2013. Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3),
pp.274-279.

Dawson, D., Searle, A.K. and Paterson, J.L., 2014. Look before you (s) leep: evaluating the use
of fatigue detection technologies within a fatigue risk management system for the road transport
industry. Sleep medicine reviews, 18(2), pp.141-152.
Finetti, F., Patrussi, L., Masi, G., Onnis, A., Galgano, D., Lucherini, O.M., Pazour, G.J. and
Baldari, C.T., 2014. Specific recycling receptors are targeted to the immune synapse by the
intraflagellar transport system. J Cell Sci, 127(9), pp.1924-1937.
Geels, F.W., 2012. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-
level perspective into transport studies. Journal of transport geography, 24, pp.471-482.
Hine, J. and Mitchell, F., 2017. Transport disadvantage and social exclusion: exclusionary
mechanisms in transport in urban Scotland. Routledge.
Li, G., Zhu, D., Peng, T., Liu, Y., Wang, Y. and Bryce, M.R., 2014. Very High Efficiency
Orange‐Red Light‐Emitting Devices with Low Roll‐Off at High Luminance Based on an Ideal
Host–Guest System Consisting of Two Novel Phosphorescent Iridium Complexes with Bipolar
Transport. Advanced Functional Materials, 24(47), pp.7420-7426.
Rajé, F., 2017. Negotiating the transport system: user contexts, experiences and needs.
Routledge.
Stein, A.F., Draxler, R.R., Rolph, G.D., Stunder, B.J., Cohen, M.D. and Ngan, F., 2015.
NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bulletin of the
American Meteorological Society, 96(12), pp.2059-2077.
Tolley, R. and Turton, B.J., 2014. Transport systems, policy and planning: a geographical
approach. Routledge.

Urry, J., 2016. Mobilities: new perspectives on transport and society. Routledge.
Watson, M., 2012. How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport
system. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp.488-496.

APPENDIX
Site for the redevelopment program