Economics: Utility Theory, Transportation Projects Analysis Report

This report delves into the application of utility theory within the context of transportation projects. It begins by outlining the core assumptions of utility theory, including completeness, mix-is-better, and rationality, providing a foundation for understanding individual preferences in economic decision-making. The report then explores the economic impacts of transportation projects, emphasizing their influence on community development, business activity, productivity, and property values. It highlights the importance of considering both positive and negative economic impacts and avoiding double-counting in cost-benefit analyses. Finally, the report discusses fundamental economic concepts used to analyze transportation projects, such as case studies, input-output models, and cost/benefit analysis, offering a comprehensive overview of the economic considerations involved in transportation planning and implementation.

Running Head: SUPPLY CHAIN AND LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Supply Chain and Logistics Management
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

1SUPPLY CHAIN AND LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Utility theory
Utility theory under all aspects generally bases its theoretical beliefs upon the
preferences which are associated with the individuals. It is considered to be a theoretical part
assumed in economics in order to explain behavioral part associated with the individuals based
upon the premise which people can reliably create a rank order on their choices which are
dependent upon the preferences related to them (Denoeux & Shenoy, 2019). Under this
respective part, it is understandable that each individual generally showcases different mode of
preferences which basically appears to be much hard-wired within every individual.
Thus, under this respective part it can be stated that several preferences which are
related to the individuals are completely on an intrinsic basis. Some of the major
assumptions of utility theory are mentioned below:
Completeness: Individuals under all aspects can easily rank order every possible bundle. In this
respective part the theory clearly assumes that, no matter how much consumptions bundles
of different combinations are placed beside the individual, every individual can rank them on
the basis of their preferences.
Thus, it is understandable that individuals are liable to compare any available bundle
with compared to other bundles and can easily rank them on the basis of their satisfaction
level provided by the bundles.
Mix-is-better: Suppose a particular individual is completely indifferent with choice among
clothing of one week and same as compared to food (Moscati, 2016). Thus, either under this
respective part choice made by itself is generally not preferred on the other. The “mix-is-better”
part assumption regarding the preferences states that mix made out of two, we can say half

2SUPPLY CHAIN AND LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
week food mixed with half week of clothing. This will generally be favored to both stand-
alone selections made.
Thus, for example, when the milk is mixed with boost it will be generally preferred to
milk or boost alone. This is basically known as convexity related assumptions on certain made
preferences where preferences are considered to be convex.
Rationality: This is considered to be the most controversial and important assumptions
associated with the system of utility theory. Under the part of rationality, basically preferences
related to individuals any mode of circularity.
Where, Bundle A is made preferred to B and same done with bundle C, then under all
aspects A is also preferred to C.
This assumption generally assumes that inborn preferences are considered to be fixed,
regardless of time and context.
Benefits of Transportation Projects and Fundamental Economic Concepts
Transportation projects under all aspects can have numerous impacts on objectives
economic development of the community, which may generally include business activity,
productivity, property values, tax revenues and investment ( Under this particular case the
community can generally range in scales form distinct households to the part of regions, nations,
cities and also the entire world).
In general, it is considered to be a stated part that the transportation project which
improves the overall accessibility and reduce the transportation cost generally paly a major
role in the part of increasing the development and productivity of the economy.

3SUPPLY CHAIN AND LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Care is considered to be a required part in order to avoid impacts related to the system of
double-counting which are already considered and counted in the part of savings related to
vehicle cost and travel time, safety benefits or emissions. Many of the Economic impacts are
based on economic transfers where others are basically related to resource changes on a true
basis.
Under certain situations, impact distribution is considered to be an important part. For
example, from perspective of people who generally gain from the side of economic transfer is
considered to be a true benefit, but not generally form the part of society’s general perspective.
It is regarded as an important part to consider the complete range related to economic impacts,
both negative and positive, that transport project basically causes (Nadafianshahamabadi,
Tayarani & Rowangould, 2017). Basically, under all aspects improving the access to particular
area can easily expose the business process towards more competition.
Some of the major fundamental economic concepts used to analyze economic projects are
case studies, input-output model, computer models, not statistical and statistical
comparison, surveys, cost/benefit analysis and many others.

4SUPPLY CHAIN AND LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
References
Denoeux, T., & Shenoy, P. P. (2019). An interval-valued utility theory for decision making with
Dempster-Shafer belief functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06594.
Moscati, I. (2016). Retrospectives: how economists came to accept expected utility theory: the
case of samuelson and savage. Journal of economic perspectives, 30(2), 219-36.
Nadafianshahamabadi, R., Tayarani, M., & Rowangould, G. M. (2017). Differences in expertise
and values: Comparing community and expert assessments of a transportation
project. Sustainable cities and society, 28, 67-75.
Rashidi, K., Stadelmann, M., & Patt, A. (2017). Valuing co-benefits to make low-carbon
investments in cities bankable: the case of waste and transportation projects. Sustainable
cities and society, 34, 69-78.