UK Public Law: Government's Power to Withhold Royal Assent and Queen's Role in Fresh Elections

This document discusses the UK public law aspects of the government's power to withhold Royal Assent in a fixed term parliament and the role of the Queen in advising for fresh elections. It explores the legal framework and implications of these actions, highlighting the importance of majority support in both houses of parliament.

UK Public Law

TABLE OF CONTENT
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY........................................................................................................................................3
1 Government to withhold Royal Assent in fixed term parliament...................................................3
2 Advice by Queen for fresh elections...............................................................................................5
CONCLUSION.....................................................................................................................................6
REFRENCES........................................................................................................................................7

INTRODUCTION
UK public law can be understood as one of the best public law legal system within
global system for gaining best working political standards, for strengthening best connectivity
benchmarks and also sub scale best competencies. The study within report will be also further
analysing case study, to gain best determined connectivity for larger functional scope for
keeping up best legal system.
MAIN BODY
1 Government to withhold Royal Assent in fixed term parliament
Government cannot withhold Royal Assent Starmers fixed term parliament bill, as it
has been passed by both houses of parliament which further explains UK public law aspects
for attaining best law agreement done. It can be understood that bill needs to be passed by
both houses of parliament, for keeping up working scale productivity within eyes of UK
public law. As per fixed term payment bill, Royal assent to Starmer cannot be withheld by
government which further explains proportion of seats in house of commons will more
closely reflect proportion of vote casts (Fixed Term Parliament Act 2011. 2021).
The bill has been passed by both houses of parliament, which explains UK public law
for proportion representation fundamentally towards gained up working efficiency.
Progressive alliance legally bind up further working standards, for keeping up government
legal well defined structure where it enables larger electoral reforms to be worked on.
Judgement by Preeti Patelis analysed to be not accurate, where she passes fixed term
parliament bill as an assault of democracy and act of constitutional vandalism. The
opposition MPs constitutional proper way to get electoral reform then forms one of the best
electoral reform, where they want government elections to be fair. Both houses of
parliaments have power to pass electoral reforms, as per they want electoral reform and
government policies used actively. Further, main reasons that sources close to prime minister

post in government must be liable and hold wide range of transparency in eyes of law. Public
law in UK, according to poling must be based on democracy and fixed elective reforms for
gaining best functional goals attained within parliament judiciary. Bills emphasising cross
party support says that it will enable parliamentary majority to form new coalition
government, with principal aim of bringing forwards electoral reforms (Weaver, Friedland
and Rosen, 2021).
There should be fixed term parliament bill pass at all stages by government, as the
House of Commons and house of lords have declared it pass accurately. Aim is to ensure that
future elections and bills, must be done as per larger democracy aspects and majority of
people voted for gaining wider potential in bringing best decisions. The government do not
hold executive power to withhold Royal Assent bill, when passed by both houses of
parliament where decision has been taken as per majority actions. The public law in UK
heads on focus towards actions taken by queen within parliament, where majority between
houses enables to bring best actions profoundly. Further, it can be also analysed that House
of common, and house of lords further bring on competent scope for strengthening law
functioning where UK Royal Assert Starmer bill should be passed accurately for executive
actions. It can be also analysed that majority of people confidence to bring on bill law passed,
further brings on keen strength as per parliament laws where both houses plays strong role for
enabling imposition of law effectively by any bill.
The fixed term parliaments act 2011, sets five year interval between ordinary general
elections where the act include mechanisms that could lead to yearly general elections. The
act specifies further that early elections can be held only, where law between houses plays
strong role within early 14 days (Young, 2021). Government cannot lawfully withhold Royal
assent to Starmers October 2024 fixed term parliament bills, because it is further correlated
with bills passed by both houses which further bring on strong focus towards keen strength
productively. This can be also analysed as one of the best essential aspect , for connecting
towards public law establishments under eye of law in UK whose legal system is widely one
of the most accurate political legal system. Case study enables us to furher concluded
research on aspects, that government cannot legally withhold Royal Assent to Starmer act,
which is fixed term parliament bill for gaining best accountability horizons. Till any of the
houses of law within parliament hinders support, and the majority is against the government
should not stop bill fundamentally.

2 Advice by Queen for fresh elections
Government can lawfully advise queen to dissolve parliament in the above discussed
circumstances where house of commons and house of lords are both essential for attaining
best functional scope. It can be understood that queen plays huge role in constitutional role in
opening and dissolving parliament, which approves bills becoming law which further enables
to bring best parliament decision (Cahill and Clear,2021). Prime minister Patel advice queen
to dissolve parliament effectively as per best best general law aspects, for effective
constitutional framework. Queen Elizabeth, UK remains head of British state and the highest
representative of UK on the national and international stage. UK head of British government,
serves as symbol of high effective public law potentialities within symbol of country for
attaining best working benchmarks. In the role of head of state, queen has power to get fresh
elections conducted as per circumstances bringing on further focus on operational and
political power. Queen keeps close contact with house of laws, within parliament where any
legal action cannot be taken without authorized approval by queen. There is special
significance attached to queen legal actions, for conducting elections within parliament which
further heads on focus towards accurate legal conducting of best practices.
House of commons in government, which further indicates house would have
confidence in government where both houses must be scaled up larger focus. Taking legal
advice from queen will enable parliament to take best steps further in coordination with
queen legal actions, which further in built uk public law rules. It can be also analysed that
fresh general action, will generate efficiency within legal system for overall productive varied
efficacy operations. It can be also understood that power of queen comes above all legal
house systems where political strength and competencies are widely attached, towards
attaining best legal framework. The houses of laws and parliament cannot pass any law
without support of both legal houses and fresh general election will further correlate new
scale growth informatively. Motion for humble address, to queen indicating that house has
confidence in government, will further bring forward imperative growth towards UK public
law system to attain best structural growth decisions (Baker and et.al, 202)..
Support of queen within law, and parliament will further generate fresh general
elections, fair as per competencies within larger voting system. It can be concluded that
further scaled up effective legal system, further correlates with specific UK legal system
where queen power is the most premium. The queen further can implement best legal
decisions for fresh elections as per circumstances, ranging within legal system growth goals

where bill passed by majority should be passed with final approval of queen. It can be also
worked on within research for case study analysis, that bill cannot be declined or withhold by
government if passed by majority of people in both of houses. Further, UK legal system has
been actively bringing on focus towards building best system as per majority of people
voting, which further keenly evolves focus on power within queen.
The Queen of UK holds maximum power to bring on best electoral decisions freshly,
for attaining parliament structure in shape and also represent best ideals as per public legal
law. It can be further concluded that queen of UK also holds power to take active decisions
as per legal standards within public legal standards in public law, which further brings on
scope for attaining best competencies functionally. Bill must be passed with full majority
within houses, where further vivid scale connectivity towards attained professional work
standards will be based on legal working standards. Advice from queen for legal action will
generate best functional scope to determine best legal actions as per majority within
decisions. This further heads on focus towards developing overall growth connectively
towards UK legal system, and also raised up working standards productively.
Queen electoral power is supreme and also widely correlated towards attaining best
benchmarks, which will further correlate towards productive best public legal system.
Furthermore, there is also keen focus for scaled up effective growth standards towards which
queen holds legitimate power which further heads on focus for bringing on further expansion.
Queen Electoral power by legal system, for gaining specific attained performance rise
towards evocative results towards legal developed system which keenly also heads on
dynamic competencies.
CONCLUSION
From the above record, it can be concluded towards UK Legal system, further brings
on wider scale competent efficacy horizons towards attaining best work determinants which
further correlates with larger scaled up competencies. The study has also further concluded
UK legal system needs approval of queen, further keeping up productive growth domains
which informatively correlate towards specific competencies.

REFRENCES
Books and Journals
Baker, T and et.al, 2021. Insurance law and policy: cases and materials. Aspen Publishers.
Cahill, D. and Clear, S., 2021. An Empirical Study of the Frequency and Distribution of
Judicial Review in Resolving Public Procurement Disputes Within the UK:
Proposals for Legal and Policy Reform. European Public Law, 27(1).
Weaver, R.L., Friedland, S.I. and Rosen, R.D., 2021. Constitutional Law: cases, materials,
and problems. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Young, A.L., 2021. British Government and the Constitution: Text and Materials. Cambridge
University Press.
Online
Fixed Term Parliament Act 2011. 2021. [Online]. Available Through:<
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06111/>