Understanding and Leading Change

This report explores the impact of change on organizational strategy and operations, the factors influencing leadership and teamwork, steps to reduce negative impact, and barriers to change.

Understanding and Leading
Change

Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
TASK 1............................................................................................................................................3
P1 Various organisational examples about an impact of change on the organizational strategy
and operations..............................................................................................................................3
TASK 2............................................................................................................................................4
P2 Ways for internal and external major factors for change which impact the leadership, team
work and an organisation.............................................................................................................4
P3 Steps taken by the organisation in reduce the negative impact of change in organisation.....6
TASK 3............................................................................................................................................9
P4 Various barriers for change and their impact upon the leadership styles...............................9
TASK 4..........................................................................................................................................11
Various leadership approaches for dealing with organisational change....................................11
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................11
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................12

INTRODUCTION
Change can be depicted as the procedure of evolvement of adjustment of any component.
In this task report, endeavor has been had to assess the effect of progress on system and business
activities and recognize the explanations behind driving change. For reference purpose this
report has taken an example of an organisation, Blake Logistech Management. It is an
organisation of medium scaled which had a very profound growth in its 3-5 years. The
organisation is into hospitality industry which engaged into the work of interior designing,
gourmet chefs, and the like. The report means to assess the measures being embraced by the
administration of associations to limit the effect of progress and furthermore endeavors to
recognize different boundaries of progress. Finally, the report expects to assess the job of various
authority styles and approaches in authoritative change the executives.
TASK 1
P1 Various organisational examples about an impact of change on the organizational strategy
and operations.
Change can be characterized as the procedure where something develops or changes into an
alternate thing. In business setting, change may allude to a modification in business condition or
inside authoritative components which prompts an effect on the procedure and tasks of the
business. Each change which occurs in an authoritative setting significantly affects the key
dynamic by the administration. Variables which should be considered for affecting the
progressions related an association's system and tasks are outside business condition, for
example, innovative, natural elements, monetary factors etcetera and interior figures, for
example, change the executives or organization goals (Aguirre and Alpern, 2014). The
progressions occurring in an association can be ordered into two classifications: Planned change
and Emergent change. A short depiction of both the progressions is being done underneath.
Arranged Change:
Arranged changes can be depicted as the progressions occurring in an association because of
intentional activity of the management based on method of reasoning and cognizant reasoning.
Arranged changes are controllable and have a positive initiating and finish point. These

progressions are driven by management with a goal of improving operational execution and are
frequently opposed by the workers.
Developing Change:
Developing changes can be named as the progressions unfurling or unrevealing in a fairly
impromptu and unconstrained way because of reacting to a business circumstance or an issue.
Usage of such changes is regularly drived by an outside factor and is frequently executed in an
impromptu way which may prompt mayhem. There is next to no or no control of the
management over the variables impacting such changes (Aslan and Reigeluth, 2013).
Both arranged changes and rising changes sway the association's procedure and activities
actually. To comprehend the progressions and its effect on business systems and activities in a
superior manner, a contextual investigation of blake Logitech management is being done in the
accompanying segment of the report:
Impact of change at blake logistech management’s operations are as follows:
With late changes and headway in the field of innovation getting so prevailing in affecting and
associations development and achievement, it is basic for supervisors to adjust the progressions
as fast as could be expected under the circumstances. The management of Blake logistech
management with a goal of expanding business development and income chose to take the tasks
of the firm on another business stage, online deals. The execution of this change greatly affected
the procedure and current activities of the organization (Doppelt, 2017). Management needed to
plan methodologies to counter representative opposition and adjust the current tasks as far as
making a great domain for the change to mix inside the association culture. This change can be
comprehended as an arranged change by the management with a particular target of expanding
the deals and business development.
TASK 2
P2 Ways for internal and external major factors for change which impact the leadership, team
work and an organisation
Different inward and outside variables go about as drivers of progress which impact the
practices inside an association (Drago-Severson and Blum-DeStefano, 2018). A concise

assessment of both inner and outside elements of progress is being done to comprehend its effect
on hierarchical conduct in a superior manner.
Inner Factors: Inner drivers of progress, for example, assets of an association, hierarchical
culture, worker and staff jobs and authoritative condition influence the individual and group
practices inside an association in the accompanying manners:
Authoritative assets: Implementation of a change and technique relies a lot upon the assets of
an association, for example, human capital, money related assets, innovation etcetera. A positive
conduct is instilled if the assets of the association are agreeable to the change execution process
for instance, supervisors of blake Logistech picked up worker energize and support with the
assistance of money related assets of the organization (Kerridge, 2012).
Authoritative culture and condition: Work condition and culture inside an association decides
the degree of help and investment anticipated from the representatives for any vital or
operational change. A sound workplace and positive authoritative culture in Blake Logistech
helped the organization to tackle the issue of flexibly chain the board by adjusting techniques
and rolling out noteworthy improvements in business tasks.
Worker jobs: Every individual from an association has an alternate job. These jobs are
characterized by the assignment and the obligations of the workers. A functioning cooperation
and commitment by each worker in Blake logistech pushed the administration to keep up a
positive conduct as for the procedure of progress.
External factors:
Company’s external factors can get analysed through Pestel analyses. Pestel analyses are a
framework which is used to analyse the macro factors which do affect the activities of an
organisation. Through the evaluation of external factors the organisation can make their
strategies and tactics accordingly. The Pestel analyses of the Blake logistech are as follows:
Political factor: The government forms various rules and regulations into the regions or
countries, these rules and regulations do comes under the political factors. The taxes which the
hospitality industry needs to provide to the government does impact the working of the
companies (Kotter, 2012). Some years before the UK government increases the tax percentage
for the hospitality industry, this put the impact upon the prices for the services and products
provided by the Blake Logiestech. An increase in their prices also put an adverse effect upon the
customer base of the company.

Economic factor: The economic factor includes the factor which tells about the
economic condition of the economy or region. The economic factor includes the factors such as
employment rates, disposable income, living standard and etc. The services which are provided
by the company is in regard with targeting the both middle and high class of people. There
packages are formed in a way that these can be afford by the middle and high class people.
Social factors: This factor includes the analyses of attitude, taste, preferences, behaviour
and etc of the targeted people. Through these evaluation the organisation gets to know about the
needs and wants of the customers and then they provides the services and products accordingly.
The Company Blake Logistech does also performs the same, they analyse the taste and
preferences of their client and then they analyses their taste and work accordingly.
Technological factor: it states the level of technological advancements and development has
taken place into the company or into the region. The company tries to uses the upgraded
technologies so that they can make their operations easy and their client satisfaction high
(Lawrence, 2015). The company has also introduce itself at various social media platform from
where they perform the advertising activities and solves the client issues or queries.
Environmental factor: Environmental factor includes the factors related to the rules and
regulations related the eco system. The processes or the operations which are adopted by the
company are all eco friend. They do not produce any harm to the environment. Also the
company has a good waste management system.
Legal factor: The legal factor includes the rules and regulations form by the legislations.
The company follows all such rules because they know that if they want to run or operate their
businesses into the region they have to obey all these rules. This also has helped the company in
gaining the trust of the customers or the targeted market.
P3 Steps taken by the organisation in reduce the negative impact of change in organisation
Changes occurring in an association significantly affect authoritative conduct and
workplace of the association. Relief of the negative effect related with these progressions is
consistently alluring for the executives of any association (Maccoby, 2015). Numerous
approaches and measures are being utilized by the directors of Blake Logistech which helps in an
examination of things to come effect of a change which has been proposed and make strides
which leads limiting the negative effects. A portion of the models and systems being utilized by
the chiefs are being talked about beneath:

Frameworks model of Change:
The Systems model of progress proposes or suggests that any change inside an organization
ought to be executed at an association wide level rather than odds and ends. This model is being
utilized by the administration of blake Logitech to limit the antagonistic and negative effects
related with execution of hierarchical change. This model gives a totally different measurement
to the idea of progress execution and gives a structure of six interconnected factors deciding the
change usage process which incorporates individuals, system, task, culture, plan and innovation
(Nelson‐Brantley and Ford, 2017). These factors ought to be the concentration for fruitful
execution of any arranged change by the administration.
Individuals: It incorporates the workforce of the organization by contemplating individual
distinction, abilities and gifts of the considerable number of representatives.
Undertaking: Task alludes to the nature and portrayal of a vocation allocated to somebody
which might be straightforward, normal or complex in nature.
Plan: It alludes to the different structures that exist inside the association, for example,
correspondence frameworks, authority etcetera.
Culture: Culture of an association is spoken to as far as the common qualities, standards,
practices and convictions that may exist between the individuals inside the organization (Peters,
2012).
Procedure: Strategy alludes to the game plan arranged by the administration for execution of
any adjustment in association or business action.
Innovation: Technology alludes to the progressions which help in improvement of a business
procedure, for example, IT frameworks, stock administration robotization etcetera.
This model is useful for the administration of blake Logitech in deciding the impact of progress
in any one variable on different factors in the interconnected system (Rodd, 2015). In this way,
any change can be assessed in a superior way by understanding the suggestion on different
factors in the association, For instance, mechanical upgradation proposed by the chiefs will

affect the undertaking of the individuals so the administration can take measures for preparing
and improvement of workers concerning new innovation which helps in limiting the negative
effects related with the change.
Burke-Litwin model of change:
The Burke-Litwin model of progress characterizes and sets up a circumstances and logical
results connection between 12 components that decide a change inside any association. This
model is utilized by the administration of blake Logitech to decide the negative effects related
with any change and take estimates which lead to minimisation of these unfavorable effects. The
vast majority of the occasions, a next to no or no thought at all on the components which decide
the effect of progress in an association prompts unsafe results and repercussions for both the
workers and the association.
The model portrays a structure for all the components which impact the procedure of progress
usage. Under the model, the components are separated into three gatherings or segments
dependent on the nature (Stanleigh, 2013). The components in the center segment are alluded as
the foundation of the model, components on the left are considered hard-components that are
unmistakable and the components on the privilege are delicate components that are principally
unique. By an assessment of the effect of any change on all the components in the model, the
directors of blake Logitech can decide and recognize measures which may help in relief of the

negative effects and increment the help for the change. This model aides in giving a powerful
methodology to the administration of hierarchical change. Beginning advance in the utilization
of this model requires a distinguishing proof of the component bunch which causes the change
and the subsequent stage includes recognizing the specific component liable for the change.
Finally, directors attempt to decide the level of impact of the component liable for driving
change on the various components which have been depicted in the model with the goal that the
ideal relief of negative effects can be accomplished (Sundberg and et. al., 2017). For instance,
the administrators of blake Logitech distinguishes the outer condition as the capable component
for evolving gracefully chain and choices were taken in a superior way with the assistance of an
examination of the effect of this component on different components in the model.
Consequently, this model has extraordinary importance and application in guaranteeing
minimisation of negative effects of progress on authoritative conduct.
TASK 3
P4 Various barriers for change and their impact upon the leadership styles
The approaches are as follows:
Force-field analysis:
The administration of blake Logitech utilizes power field investigation for taking choices
identified with hierarchical changes in the wake of breaking down the main impetuses for change
and powers which go about as resistors for change. There are five stages or stages in the process
which are as per the following:
Stage 1: Proposal for change
In the initial step of the investigation, the executives of the organization portrays the proposed
change and the arrangement figured by the administrators for usage of the change. It is a
significant advance which guarantees legitimate correspondence of the proposed change in the
entire association. For instance, for growing the tasks of the organization to online stage, the
administration needs to set up a proposition for the equivalent distinguishing the reasons or
method of reasoning behind the change.
Stage 2: Identifying powers for change

The subsequent stage during the time spent power field examination infers ID of the powers or
the drivers of progress. Different interior elements and outside components may go about as
drivers of progress inside any association. It is significant for the chiefs to recognize these
adjustments so as to take better choices. A portion of the powers might be as per the following:
Inner powers:
• Optimum use of assets and minimisation of wastage of assets.
• Offering better nature of client care.
• Improving worker inspiration and profitability
• Better authoritative structure and condition
Outside powers:
• Technological changes and developments which help in expanding profitability and
increasing serious edge
• Better eco-cordiality and supportability standing
• Rise in the pay level of individuals
• Increase in labor costs
• Changes in political strategies of any region
• Changing inclinations and propensities for buyers
Stage 3: Identifying powers against change
There are numerous outside and inside powers which should go about as obstruction for change
in any authoritative setting (van der Voet, Kuipers and Groeneveld, 2015). ID of powers which
go about as resistors for change help the administration to receive better estimates the decrease
the quantity of powers acting against change. A portion of the elements which go about as
boundaries to change may be:
Absence of worker inclusion: Resistance to change by representatives is one of the most
significant hindrance or power which impedes the entire procedure of hierarchical change.
Representative for the most part oppose any change which is required to change their every day
enacts and errands because of a dread of new innovation and absence of ability to learn new
things. Dread of the obscure goes about as a significant hindrance in deciding worker
obstruction.
Stage 4: Assigning scores

The following stage during the time spent power field examination incorporates allotting a score
to each power of driving change and opposing change based on its qualities and the impact all in
all undertaking arrangement. This helps the administration of blake Logitech to decide the
separate significance of each power which has been recognized in the past advances.
Stage 5: Analysis and application
The last advance of the procedure incorporates the dynamic procedure of the administration of
whether to go ahead with the change or not. This progression is significant for the viability of the
entire power field examination. At this stage, the administration of blake Logitech decides the
apparatuses and steps which can help in reinforcing the main impetuses for change and
debilitating of the restricting or powers against the change. For instance, preparing
representatives on the utilization of new innovation can be extremely useful in lessening the
worker opposition and expanding representative commitment and inclusion for any hierarchical
change.
TASK 4
P5 Various leadership approaches for dealing with organisational change
Covered in PPT
CONCLUSION
It very well may be finished up from the above report that the any adjustment in the
business condition or the inward condition of an association affects the technique and tasks of
the business. Different inner factors, for example, hierarchical culture and outside elements, for
example, government strategy influence the association conduct. It tends to be seen that
supervisors of blake Logitech take measures for limiting the negative effects related with any
change. Diverse outer and inward hindrances and drivers of progress influence the dynamic
procedure of the organization.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Aguirre, D. and Alpern, M., 2014. 10 principles of leading change management. Strategy+
Business.
Aslan, S. and Reigeluth, C. M., 2013. Educational technologists: Leading change for a new
paradigm of education. TechTrends. 57(5). pp.18-24.
Doppelt, B., 2017. Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for
business, government and civil society. Routledge.
Drago-Severson, E. and Blum-DeStefano, J., 2018. Leading change together: Developing
educator capacity within schools and systems. ASCD.
Kerridge, J., 2012. Leading change: 1--identifying the issue.Nursing times. 108(4). pp.12-15.
Kotter, J. P., 2012. Leading change. Harvard business press.
Lawrence, P., 2015. Leading change–insights into how leaders actually approach the challenge
of complexity. Journal of Change Management. 15(3). pp.231-252.
Maccoby, M., 2015. Strategic intelligence: Conceptual tools for leading change. Oxford
University Press, USA.
Nelson‐Brantley, H.V. and Ford, D. J., 2017. Leading change: a concept analysis. Journal of
advanced nursing. 73(4). pp.834-846.
Peters, L., 2012. The rhythm of leading change: Living with paradox. Journal of Management
Inquiry. 21(4). pp.405-411.
Rodd, J., 2015. Leading change in the early years. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Stanleigh, M., 2013. Leading change. The Journal for Quality and Participation. 36(2). p.39.
Sundberg, K., and et. al., 2017. Power and resistance: leading change in medical
education. Studies in Higher Education. 42(3). pp.445-462.
van der Voet, J., Kuipers, B. and Groeneveld, S., 2015. Held back and pushed forward: leading
change in a complex public sector environment. Journal of Organizational Change
Management.