This report aims to demystify verbal and non-verbal communication as modes of communication. The paper aims to compare three research papers on both verbal and non-verbal communications pointing out the research process, research questions commonly used, research designs used, concussions made and how reliable these findings are.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head:UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS 1 UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS Name of Student: Name of Institution:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS 2 Introduction Linguistic has undergone many revolutions over the past centuries. These changes have been as rest of the changes in trends as time goes by. Developments such as technology have had immense contributions to the evolutions of linguistics. The emergence of new languages, races, and events in the education patterns have also affected the development of linguistics, either positively or negatively. As such, we have seen more emphasis being directed towards nonverbal communication as a means of passing information from one person to another. Employers, for instance, are currently giving special attention to non-verbal communication signals by recruits during interviews. People lose job opportunities for passing wrong messages to recruiting panes using nonverbal techniques when called for interviews. Some scholars have argued that the lack of non-verbal cues in the use of computer-mediated communication methods such as messaging might prevent impressions and relational developments in communication(Vogel, et al., 2018). Face to face communication, however, achieves relationalevents faster than computer-mediated communications(Noret & Joel, 2013). Non-Verbal communications have become an integral mode of communication across the gibe. Consequently, there is a need to objectively research on its effectiveness and improve it to make it better and more reliable. This fact, however, does not rule out the importance of verbal communication.Wecanthereforeconfidentlyconcludethatbothverbalandnon-verbal communication are critical modes of communication and therefore should be we mastered and understood. Sign languages never have a systematic way through which they are invented. This
UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS 3 mode of communication is structured whenever deaf people meet, and therefore they need to communicate(Kathi & Hossam, 2011). This report aims to demystify verbal and non-verbal communication as modes of communication. The paper aims to compare three research papers on both verbal and non-verbal communications pointing out the research process, research questions commonly used, research designs used, concussions made and how reliable these findings are. The papers under review are Non-Verbal Communication in Instant Massaging(Plumb, 2013), The Role of Nonverbal and Verbal Communication in a Multimedia Informed Consent Process(Pieczkiewicz, et al., 2011)andMethodology: coding and studying nonverbal behaviour ( Harrigan, 2013). Research questions commonly asked To understand the subject matter more, questions are usually asked by the researcher to collect adequate data that would assist in making informed conclusions. Michael Plumb in his paper asks four significant questions to find data for decision making. He asks the significant differences between computer-mediated communication and face to face communication, the effects of emotions in conversation, and the effect of loss of information in computer-mediated discussions if at all there is. He concludes by seeing a stand from his audience as to which between computers mediated communication and face to face communication is more effective in conveying complex information. The answers drawn from these questions lead to the conclusions made in this paper.
UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS 4 For Harrigan, the main focus is on the body movements that communicate particular messages. These movements are as a result of specific natural muscle movements within the body. His main research question will, therefore, be which muscle movement(s) result through the physical changes observed externally by the researcher. Hypothesis and Study design These are decision making statements that the researcher draws conclusions depending on research findings. There are two types of hypotheses; null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. Whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis depends on the level of significance of the data collected. For Plumb, the null hypothesis reads ‘Participants will be very familiar with Instant Messaging and face to face communication.' The alternative hypothesis, however, indicates that the participants will find it easier to predict emotional responses from people close to them for instance family members than they would from strangers. However, for the case of Pieczkiewicz and team, they come up with a design that incorporates both verbal and non-verbal communication. Their main objective in this study is to analyse and relate verbal and non-verbal communication of an informed consent process. This ends up being proven when actual research is conducted on a selected sample of the population. Data collection methods and analysis Plumb in his research majorly used questionnaires (both written and verbal). He recorded the data from the feedback given and went ahead to data analysis. This method allows for instant feedback where it is face to face. There is also room to see clarification should there be
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS 5 something that isn't clear to either party. It, however, may be limiting to the respondent as the aspect of anonymity isn't there, and this might lead to biased feedback. In this particular paper, the data collected was then analysed using Microsoft Excel before informative inferences could be extracted. The relationships and differences in the data collected were obtained using descriptive and inferential statistics. Harrigan, in his study non-verbal communication, employs different methods of data collection. In most cases, however, observation stands out as the primary method of data collection. Coding involves observing the various body movements and expressions and then deriving meaning from each. He attempts to code information from actions like kinesics, proxemics and gaze behaviours. These methods are the most commonly used in non-verbal communication.However, they have their limitations as they might be easily misinterpreted by either the respondent or the researcher leading to incorrect conclusions. Question asking approach and observation were the primary methods for data coaction as per(Pieczkiewicz, et al., 2011).There were videotaping and digital recording of twelve mock consent sessions to ensure both verbal and non-verbal elements were captured. Compared to the entire population, it could be concluded that the sample size was adequate for a proof-of-concept paper(Pieczkiewicz, et al., 2011). Amajority of interest groups were represented, making the sample representative. The mock sessions were conducted by the same coordinator, making the process fair. Verbal communication elements were analyzed using a content analysis approach. Questionaskingbehaviouranalysismeasuresthefrequencyofquestionsaskedbythe participants and uses that information to categorize the flow of information.
UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS 6 Interpretation of results Verbal communication techniques are mostly preferred as opposed to non-verbal communication(Plumb, 2013).This is consistent with findings from previous researchers (Plumb, 2013). The nonverbal communication techniques such as kinesics, proxemics, and gaze behaviours are very limiting as there exist no specific standards for measuring their effectiveness (Kenya, Sane, Shimosato, Chizuru, & Kunihiko, 2010). The gaze variable, for example, isn't very useful for live interactions as there is no room to repay and confirm the gaze action. The gaze method would be more effective if done within an enclosed environment as opposed to the field as there are few distracters within the closed environment. The technique would be coded better in a videotape since one can repay(Ineke, Mieke, Hugo, & Gerard, 2010). When vocal coding behaviour, the main features of consideration are pitch, tempo, and loudness, vocal stress may imply sarcasm(Vj, 2010). Thedistance between participants in a field has been estimated using E.T Hall’s proxemics scales by trained coders(Canan, 2009). The findings of this research(Pieczkiewicz, et al., 2011). Clearly showed thatbecause researchers use both verbal and non-verbal techniques, face to face is indeed useful. This similar finding had been documented earlier in research by a team of scholars led by(Chinar, Kathleen, Cameron, Elisa, & Melissa, 2011). These three studies affirm the undeniable importance of both verbal and non-verbal communication. These two are related and complement one another. However, it is worth noting
UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS 7 that neither of these should be used as a replacement for the other as both ears very critical in communication. Validity and reliability of conclusions made The finding in the three papers and other supporting books and journals are overall reliable. They a point to the need for more research to be done on non-verbal communication as most of its aspects cannot be accurately quantified and verified. A good example is nodding. This may mean the message is understood, or it could just mean the next person has heard the communication but not necessarily understood. The same case applies to vocal variations. Most non-verbal cues exhibit this characteristic( Harrigan, 2013). The findings for both Plumb and Pieczkiewicz are highly reliable and valid, and the actual statistics point to more people having preference over verbal communication. A notable number also prefer non-verbal cues, therefore, making the two equally important. Conclusion Communicationisimportant.Forthecaseofverbalcommunication,good listening skills are highly encouraged(Ruth & Helen, 2012). Its aspects are however changing rapidly as the world evolves(Kemper & Shaltout, 2012).There is a need to match up with the most recent trends in communication, for instance, instant messaging. However, these efforts should not be misinterpreted to means we should ignore face-to-face communication and other formsofverbalcommunication.Cananhinttothiswhentheynotethatlackingfacial expressions, posture, and eye behaviour while communicating is equivalent to missing half of a
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS 8 performance(Canan,2009)Verbalandnon-verbalcommunicationtechniquesshould complement but not replace one another. References Harrigan, J. (2013). Coding and studying nonverbal behaviour.Methodology, 2-9. Canan, P. Z. (2009). The importance of non-verbal communication in classroom management. The Journal of Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9. Chinar, D., Kathleen, K., Cameron, D., Elisa, O., & Melissa, N. (2011). Non-Verbal Emotion Communication in Patients with Frontotemporal Dementia: A Case Study.The Journal of Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9. Ineke, V. D., Mieke, v.-K., Hugo, J. D., & Gerard, M. R. (2010). Measuring verbal and non- verbal communication in aphasia: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 5. Kathi, J. K., & Hossam, A. S. (2011). Non-verbal communication of compassion: measuring psychophysiological effects.The Journal of BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 8. Kemper, K., & Shaltout, H. (2012). Non-verbal communication of compassion: feasibility of measuring psychophysiological effects of blind exposure.The Journal of BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 9. Kenya, M., Sane, S., Shimosato, S., Chizuru, M., & Kunihiko, S. (2010). Factors are influencing the processing of visual information from non-verbal communications — the Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 4.
UNDERSTANDING DATA IN LINGUISTICS 9 Noret, & Joel. (2013). Mundane objects. Materiality and non-verbal communication.The Journal of Social Anthropology, 7. Pieczkiewicz, D., Mahnke, A., McCarty, C., Starren, J., Starren, B., & Starren, J. (2011). The Role of Nonverbal and Verbal Communication in a Multimedia Informed Consent Process.The Journal of Applied Clinical Informatics, 40-49. Plumb, M. (2013). Non-verbal communication in Instant Messaging.Journal of Linguistics, 1- 10. Ruth, B. G., & Helen, T.-F. (2012). Quality matters! Differences between expressive and receptive non-verbal communication skills in adolescents with ASD.The Journal of Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2-9. Vj, P. (2010). Hidden in Plain Sight: Master the Secrets of Non-Verbal Communication.The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 9. Vogel, Daniela, Meyer, Marco, Herendza, & Sigrid. (2018). Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students.The Journal of BMC Medical Education, 3.