Comparison Report on Academic and non-Academic Sources

UPP045/XAB041 Assessment Task 3 Template
Following additional instructions on the Assessment Task sheet, use the template below to
produce your completed assessment. The template provides the headings which you should
use to organize your work and present your answers. For each heading you should apply the
reliability criteria and explain why or why not the source meets the reliability test. Provide
your answers in proper paragraphs and sentences (rather than dot points).
Comparison Report on Academic and non-Academic Sources
Source A: Facebook can help clarify the status of a relationship
Reliability Test: Authority
This well-detailed article has been written by Gretchen Kelmer, who proves to be a
therapist for couples and she has completed her residency in the domains of clinical
psychology. She has completed her research at the Center for marital and family studies at the
prestigious University of Denver, where she evaluated the vital role of social media platforms
in human relations. The article has been published in the prestigious New York Times, and
both the author and the platform speak high volumes when it comes to credibility and
reputation at the same time as well. The publisher’s interests appear quite clear as the article
has been directed towards raising general awareness.
Reliability Test: Audience
The targeted audience remains quite distinctively marked as the article focuses upon
social media users and how they are having an extreme time when it comes to defining their
relationships. As these individuals in relationships stand confused Facebook offers a valuable
tool gaining clarity about the state, nature, and position of a relationship. Couples can be

considered as the main audience who are finding a lot of difficulties while trying to
understand the parameters of the relationships they are in.
Reliability Test: Transparency
The article presented here offers a lot of transparency by identifying the core issues
faced by couples in relationships. It does not make use of any euphemism or an indirect
approach while dealing with the primary issues. The ambiguity and the unpredictability of
modern relationships have been highlighted along with the emotional expectations that
couples fulfill on the platforms of Facebook. The manners in which they make their
relationships conspicuous can reveal a lot of signs about where they might end up in the
distant future. The article also states that public expressions of commitment ensure less room
for misunderstandings for individuals engaged in a relationship.
Reliability Test: Objectivity
This article can be identified as really objective because it dives into the various
parameters of human relationships and emotional struggles without establishing biased
decisions, opinions or unproven facts at the same time as well. The presence of personal
feelings is quite absent in the entire article and relevant information has been provided in
order to arrive at fact-based evidence.
Reliability Test: Currency
The information is not recent because the article was last updated on December 20,
2012, at 7:01 AM. It clearly shows that the research or the article is 7 years old and it has not
been developed with new information, case scenarios, and data at the same time as well. The
information present here might not be perfectly current for the topic because seven years can