U.S Green House Emissions Report
11 Pages2640 Words168 Views
Added on 2019-11-25
U.S Green House Emissions Report
Added on 2019-11-25
ShareRelated Documents
U.S GREEN HOUSE EMISSIONS 1US Green House Gas EmissionsPolicy, Politics and the International Community
GREEN HOUSE EMISSIONS 2Part ATOPIC REFLECTION Since its inception in the 1960s, the US greenhouse policy has had positive impacts on the reduction of greenhouse gasses from power plants. The recent political controversies around it raise eyebrows but the law still stands strong. The US is one of the first countries to embrace environmental laws under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Clean Air Act is among the policies and it forms a combination of different legislation targeting air pollution[ CITATION EPA14 \l 1033 ]. The adoption of the policy across the US has been instrumental in its implementation across the globe. However, the law faces criticism by business-oriented leaders like Donald Trump who feel that it discourages investors. Its punitive measures include hefty fines worth millions of dollars for its violations. This has reduced investment activities in the energy sector, hence the clash between the Obama and Trump administration on the policy[ CITATION Kor17 \l 1033 ]. Trump is against policies on power plants, climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. This leads to questions about the environmental policies, actors, and processes involved. Scientific findings reveal massive effects on greenhouse gasses[ CITATION Ten17 \l 1033 ]. On the other hand, Donald Trump trashes efforts to mitigate the effect by repealing the Obama’s policies on climate change as an agenda of national security [ CITATION Lav17 \l 1033 ]. Thisanalysis provides insights into the intentions of key actors in international policies. An analysis of Trump’s decisions and reactions from the global community reveals the scope of this policy,
GREEN HOUSE EMISSIONS 3its human rights and business factors [ CITATION Nan12 \l 1033 ]. President Obama’s Clean Power Plan targeting electric power plants supports the reduction of carbon emissions into the environment. The law identifies electric plants as leading pollutants in greenhouse gas emissions.The international community as watchdogs is keen on its impact of environmental protection laws on humanity at large [CITATION Yeu16 \l 1033 ]. The success of the international law depends on its inclusivity, justice and durability. The law is powerful because it provides guidelines for individual states. Its existence over the years reveals over 30% reductions in carbon effects in the U.S[ CITATION Bad13 \l 1033 ]. This prevents single actors like Trump from doing away with the law. The purpose and impact of the environmental law makes it a powerful tool in the global system.Glasson, Therivel, & Chadwick (2013) highlight the role of principal actors in environmental policies. Benefiting millions, the Clean Power Plan protects from health effects such as premature deaths, and it mitigates health complications like asthma. The law is not overbearing because it provides guidelines for power plants to operate efficiently. It encourages the use of renewal energy sources like solar and bio energy too. Public participation in the law makes it popular because it encourages consumer participation in energy efficiency and reduced pollution.Its specific elements address all areas affected including electricity generation points, states and consumers. It has the support of environmental groups, conservative political groups, the federal government and the public. The law has undergone screenings to identify its core issues and impact. Its application in different parts of the globe reaffirms its usefulness making it irrevocable.
GREEN HOUSE EMISSIONS 4PART BANNONNATED BIBLIOGRAPHY (1000 words)Santoro, R; Howarth, R; Ingraffea, A. 2011. Mathane and the greenhouse-gas footprint ofnatural gas from shale formations. Climate Change. Vol 106, pp, 679-690Santoro, Howarth, & Ingraffea (2011) give evidence of the existence of green house gases in the environment. Although this research is not focused on electricity generated emisions, it acknowlegdes the footprints of green house generation. The research points at methane as a more powerful gas than carboon in the destruction of the ozone layer. This counteracts Trumps sentiments that there is no evidence of greenhouses. Trump as a head of state has the power to scrap off the executive orders and regulations within the Obama plan[ CITATION Kor17 \l 1033 ]. The research also points to the fact that the emission of the gasses increase over time. In support of this research Rosa & Dietz (2012) give emphasis to its systematic effects. From the articles, human activities and natural factors contribute to cliate change. The research shows its negative effect on human health as it stress changes in the environment. Obama’s policies had a target of reducing the emissions by 40% and its success shows more than 30% breakkthoughs over the years (Badbury et al., 2013). This article supports research into climate change highlighting the consequences of human action and natural causes. The article supports the need for a collaborated effort between state, non state and individual actors in curbing climate change effects.
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Assignment on Global Energy Outlooklg...
|9
|2218
|82
Carbon dioxide as air pollutantlg...
|17
|5558
|359
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) Policy?lg...
|5
|867
|24
Renewable Energy Sources in Engineeringlg...
|9
|1718
|244
Assignment about Candidate job experiencelg...
|5
|1246
|14
Water Resourceslg...
|7
|1471
|60