Overcoming Barriers for Using Cross Laminated Timber in Multi-Storey Construction

This research paper evaluates the feasibility of using engineered timber, specifically Cross Laminated Timber (CLT), as a primary construction material for medium rise buildings. It discusses the benefits and challenges of adopting this sustainable and cost-effective alternative to traditional construction methods, and aims to address the barriers to implementing multi-storey timber construction in the Brisbane context. The paper includes a literature review, research methods and process, innovations and benefits, limitations of the study, and conclusions and recommendations.

OVERCOMING THE BARRIERS FOR USING CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER
IN MULTI-STOREY CONSTRUCTION
May 22, 2018

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER 2:
ABSTRACT
Universally, the creation and frequent advancement of the structures of medium to high climb
constructions have achieved an essential role in the progression and expansion of our cities.
The more popular and considered structural materials for these buildings are concrete and
metallic: strengthened concrete; and they're regarded as the significant generators of Skin
tightening and (CO2) and the embodied energy associated with these materials is relatively
greater than green materials like designed timber (i.e. Combination Laminated Timber - CLT,
Laminated Veneer Lumber - LVL and so on). CLT structure represents a decrease in embodied
energy usage unlike other typical building techniques.
In this situation, we will give attention to medium rise complexes up to fifteen (15) storeys high.
The adoption of built timber, LVL, and other groundbreaking timber products provides a
determined and practical alternate in response to environmentally friendly, technical and
economic problems currently experienced in the development industry. Not surprisingly,
research thus far show indications of the level of resistance to the adoption of the new
operations and related progressive practices in Australia.

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER 3:
Table of Contents
Research background.................................................................................................................................4
Significance of Research.........................................................................................................................5
Gap Analysis............................................................................................................................................6
Research Aim and Objectives.................................................................................................................6
Literature Review........................................................................................................................................7
Development of Cross-Laminated Timber..............................................................................................8
Research Methods and Process................................................................................................................10
Innovations and Benefits/Contributions..............................................................................................11
Limitations of the Study............................................................................................................................12
Conclusions and Recommendations.....................................................................................................13
References.................................................................................................................................................16

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER 4:
Research background
Since the turn of the century and the beginning of American high-rise construction influence,
Brisbane’s construction socio-economic context has been characterized by the concrete and
steel approach to multi-story building. This groundbreaking 20th Century innovation enabled to
reflect the society’s industrialization in the construction sector. Thus, cities competed across
the world for building bigger and higher buildings, which became a symbol of power and
development. Also, concrete-steel construction technologies allowed cities to cope with the
demands of ever-growing urban areas in both housing and infrastructure.
If considered and implemented in the specific market segment, it will be one of the measures to
create a clean, healthy and a sustainable world. Additional in-depth research in matters
surrounding the above-mentioned topic such as procurement methods, local manufacturing
strategies, fire resistance properties as well as importantly its structural integrity and bracing,
concrete to timber connection methods; can also further the current and future research and
be the share to a better sustainable world.
While a considerable lot of the principal difficulties to multi-storey construction have been
overcome through solid steel construction innovation in the course of recent years; new
difficulties and necessities have risen as the society currently goes into another time set apart
by expanding natural mindfulness. In this period advancement is required to meet new
reasonable criteria driven by developing natural concerns, by changing the way we take a look
at structures. These days, notwithstanding supporting the requirements of a city's urban
populace, society is worried about environmental change, the lifecycle of construction
materials, and carbon impression. Bringing about the important utilization of more manageable
innovation to help develop our up and coming age of structures.
As of late, this test has been tended to through the appropriation of reasonable contrasting
options to customary techniques. At the front line is Multi-storey Timber Construction (MTC),
especially Cross Laminated Timber (CLT), where through the use of late designing headways

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER 5:
new roads of conceivable outcomes are being opened (Giesekam, Barrett, & Taylor, 2016). The
wood utilized as a part of CLT is sourced from economical pine plantations, sequestering carbon
for the life cycle of the building, making a carbon regular item. In all CLT can possibly give the
specialized, monetary and natural proportionate arrangement.
Significance of Research
The construction of structures devours the most assets of any part around the world. What's
more, the consequent control of these structures is the biggest wellspring of vitality utilize
around the world. This has brought about structures being every year in charge of 19% of
aggregate carbon discharges (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Because of
the huge impact of structures on nature, the reduction prospects of diminishing discharges by
building more quick-witted, greener structures are awesome.
CLT presents the business with a comparative cost item as conventional solid steel construction,
anyway with carbon nonpartisan and vitality sparing properties (Lehmann, 2012). A study
directed found if timber is utilized instead of cement, amid the material creation organize there
would be between 60 to 80% fewer discharges. Another study has exhibited through PC
displaying CLT structures are likewise much more prone to expend less vitality than their solid
steel partners. The study found that amid the operational existence of a building a normal of
24.6% in carbon decreases can be accomplished.
Regardless of these advantages, there are noteworthy obstructions to the adjustment of Cross
Laminated Timber (CLT) as a suitable option. These obstructions in the Australian setting are for
the most part determined by proficient complaints on the grounds of flame wellbeing, store
network challenges, timber strength and auxiliary respectability. Likewise, moderate
government and industry, directions go about as an obstacle for adjustment (Xia et al, 2014). As
noted in the past writing, future studies giving precise examinations into the advantages of CLT
are expected to help dissipate fantasies and help advance the positives of CLT, especially for in
the Brisbane setting.

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER 6:
Gap Analysis
Despite the fact that a generally substantial group of writing as of now exists on the positives,
restrictions and social difficulties of CLT, there is a huge absence of research directed on the
recognition that supports the selection of this innovation and the status of government
controls, especially in the Brisbane setting. As specified by Xia et al., (2014) future studies need
to enable further to investigate the deterrents to adjustment. This can incorporate building up
reasonable supply chains, illuminating clients of the status government directions, and teaching
forthcoming clients to beat the apparent hindrances.
All together for a novel innovation to be adjusted effectively the take-up should rush to build
the validity of an item. By a method for tending to these deficiencies, this study will make
inquiries looking to fill to hole noted previously. Giving this study zone significance as in if done
effectively more can be known locally about the obstructions to effectively adjusting Cross
Laminated Timber as a building answer for Multi-storey Construction.
Research Aim and Objectives
The aim of this research paper is to evaluate the capability and feasibility of engineered timber
as a primary construction material for medium rise buildings. Research to date indicates the
construction industry is one of the major players for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and
identifies the need to adopt innovative and sustainable construction techniques to mitigate the
issues in relation to it. In addition to that, experts’ opinions following their research in this field,
determine some benefits over traditional construction if we adopt this technique. This project
aims to address the following:
a) To help improve the current technical and social understanding of the barriers to
implementing multi-storey timber construction specific to the Brisbane context.
b) To address the challenges posed by an absence of a local supply chain, legislation which
fails to specifically address Cross Laminated Timber
c) To evaluate how negative social perceptions of fire risk and timber durability are
managed

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER 7:
Literature Review
Various past studies have tended to boundaries to specific types of 'green building' or 'feasible
building'. A portion of these studies takes wide meanings of manageability, fusing financial and
social variables, while others have concentrated particularly on the natural parts of
maintainability. Be that as it may, these studies have had a tendency to think about just
operational emanations, the selection of vitality proficient advances, or the accomplishment of
administrative targets, for example, zero carbon homes, that avoid the typified emanations of
materials utilized as a part of the construction. Scarcely any, have concentrated particularly
upon the hindrances to an elective material decision as methods for moderating encapsulated
carbon emanations. The following audit, accordingly, draws upon writing from two streams.
The principal stream highlights studies that offer to understand the social and institutional
obstructions averting manageable innovation inside the construction business.
The next stream is made up of nitty-gritty studies that address selecting particular option
materials (e.g. straw number). Obstructions to the invention in the structure business.
Engineering is a profoundly divided, chance disinclined, provider-driven industry. Most building
organizations utilize little workforces and are constrained in their research also, advancement
(R&D) skills and absorptive limit. Hardly any organizations are capable of review exhaustively all
elements of novel materials and frequently the capability to exploit new inventions is at the
mercy of particular individuals’ capital. The thought of the business enterprise requires moving
between impermanent responsibilities, regularly of a fantastic identity with a changing set of
associates. Thus, learning is performed on a starting to-extend idea with experts creating
observations and talents from their specific encounters. This unsystematic method of working
up learning prompts a hesitance to work with new improvements and materials. This result in
drowsy incremental change and the modest dissemination of inventions.
This process of information improvement is likewise hampered by poor learning trade from the
scholarly world to a business. A belligerent industry condition combines this antipathy for
development and takes a high amount of pre-execution confirm for new construction items to

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER 8:
build up authenticity and accomplish acknowledgment. Construction experts ordinarily depend
on contextual analyses to assess novel items, putting a substantial weight on 'others' to
advance first. This repugnance for innovation is strengthened by 'unmistakably delineated
connections in light of legally binding commitments' which 'compel between firm relations and
data sharing', 'fortify pecking orders and power asymmetries'. The customarily isolated building
process including numerous gatherings regularly decreases the capacity of any person to settle
on all-encompassing undertaking choices.
Thus, singular partners frequently feel unfit to uphold reasonable arrangements 'down the line'.
The need to upset customary factional connections and grasp a foundational way to deal with
construction has been noted for quite a while. Notwithstanding this, legally binding structures
still routinely repress compelling incorporation of configuration groups and the inventory
network. Tragically, it is just through more prominent correspondence and early commitment
of the full production network that the information of all partners can be completely utilized.
Without this early commitment, venture choices are regularly made past the point of no return
for financially savvy or functional usage.
Development of Cross-Laminated Timber
Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) is a generally new wonder with beginning advancement
happening in all through Europe in the late twentieth century (Harris, 2015). Fundamentally, it
is a few layers of wood, sourced from the weaker external side sheets of processed timber. CLT
typically comprises 4 to 8 layers which are put and fundamentally stuck at right edges to the
next to frame strong basic boards. These boards are then transported to and gathered together
on location. Attempted and tried European softwoods are by and by the timber decision,
anyway with CLT picking up fame hardwood and other non-European timbers are being tried
for their appropriateness. The expanding notoriety of CLT can be seen through the rising
generation levels, with a 17% expansion in worldwide creation to now 700,00 m3 a year from
2016 to 2017 alone (Timber Online, 2017).

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER 9:
Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) can possibly be a positive contrasting option to conventional
techniques utilized as a part of an industry frequently marked traditionalist, stale and routine
(Jones, Stegemann, Sykes, & Winslow, 2016). The present material procedures of the
construction business guarantee it is the most asset serious division on the planet. With the
worldwide populace set to keep up its present development rate, the requirement for lodging
will keep on growing. Therefore, novel supportable innovations are being pushed to supplant
conventional unsustainable techniques and help make a 'roundabout economy'.
The Australian economy is merely starting with the use of cross-laminated timber, however,
countries, where CLT market is maturing, are the UK (UK), Austria, Sweden, Germany,
Switzerland, and Norway (Kremer, 2015). The estimated development of CLT in the UK was
forecasted to 1 million cubic meters in 2015. Ahead of that, until 2010, only thirty percent of it
turned out constructed. Relating to Passarelli & Koshihara (2017), a lot of the research
regarding timber-framed properties give attention to the non-commercial sector (1 to 4 storey
high properties which include home). Undeniably, in medium surge buildings, there's a
recognized absenteeism of timber as a structural part and its own use. Australia removed its
constraints from making multi-storey timber properties after 1994 because of clinical tests
indicating the sufficient flame performance in distinctively designed timber structures.
CLT shows some positive advantages including cost-effectiveness, personal savings by lessening
on-site labor priced at, a decrease in environmental impact and usage of the renewable tool.
For this reason, the forecasted market power for CLT in Australia shows its viability as the
marketplace needs (Kremer, 2015). Problems like product's market consciousness, the
establishment of local resource string and value string, anatomist and design knowledge and
many more can be found for the CLT engineering evolution. Some studies also show that there
surely is insufficient government's involvement to advertise CLT and questions were brought up
about its flames resistance abilities (Xia et al, 2014).
As we are heading towards creating a better and sustainable world, investigation and findings
identical to this will have a significant role in the future of the construction industry. In my

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
10:
opinion, research in this area is not sufficient and potentially requires more attention as we are
still living with the old thinking of using traditional construction techniques with higher
embodied energy and higher GHG emissions. Further studies will need to be carried out in
relation to the availability and effective procurement methods of the engineered timber and
related products, its application to determine its best market segment suitability as well as its
tensile and structural strengths against traditional construction materials.
Research Methods and Process
The method used to research the above-mentioned subject is qualitative. The content analysis
research method is adopted in this instance. In this type of method, the relationship between
contents and/or opinions of credible sources is reviewed and then outlined in a summary. The
aim is to rigorously scrutinize available literature published by well-known experts and authors
in this field. Additional literature that is industry specific reports, journal articles, conference
proceedings and the like will support to further the analysis. With this said, to aid with
extensive research findings, contents related to the above subject will be extracted and
interpreted from the said literature/s above.
By investigating significant writing, various repeating factors rose. Through these components,
it is conceivable to watch that the primary boundaries for receiving Cross Laminated Timber are
basically social. These elements show through the innate personal conduct standards of
industry impacts and construction experts. To enhance the comprehension of how these
variables could be tended to inside a genuine setting, the present study thinks about the
components recognized in the writing with the direct encounters of construction experts in
Brisbane. To this reason, 25 King Street multi-story building contextual analysis has been
chosen to research how and up to what degree the variables supporting the selection of CLT
affected the construction procedure. Moreover, this contextual investigation additionally
examinations how these components were tended to. The encounters an impression of the
construction experts associated with the undertaking will be gathered through semi-organized

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
11:
meetings. This information accumulation strategy empowers the gathering of inside and out
information. Likewise, this strategy suits the exploratory idea of the research questions.
As said the experts behind the advancement of 25 King Street will be the objective interviewees
for this situation study. They have been chosen as the essential focus of interviews as they will
have the most a la mode encounters in regards to this building arrangement. Moreover, other
driving building organizations will likewise be focused on this meeting procedure to encourage
comprehend their hesitance to receiving this material in Brisbane. Further to this, the
expectation is to focus on an assortment of experts from various fields working in the business,
to help distinguish the distinctive boundaries particular to each field. Through this, it is trusted a
greater picture can be acquired on Multi-storey Cross Laminated Timber construction particular
to the Brisbane setting.
The consent for morals endorsement identifying with the substance of the meetings will be
submitted to the Queensland University of Technology Office of Research Ethics and Integrity
(OREI). The meeting substance will be checked by OREI staff to guarantee they hold fast to all
applicable moral Australian controls for human research and all Queensland University of
Technology guidelines. The data accumulated all through the meeting procedure will be
recorded using a cell phone and after that interpreted and the information planned through to
Microsoft word. The information will then be surveyed through topical investigations to help
distinguish the corresponding subjects across the particular answers.
Innovations and Benefits/Contributions
CLT can be an informed response to the construction industry with lower embodied energy and
as a low CO2 generator as the construction industry is considered to be one of the major players
for GHG emissions. Additionally, it provides alternative sustainable solutions in response to the
economic, environmental and technical problems currently faced around the globe.
To the scholarly world, this study guarantees to help assess and add to the developing
collection of information tending to the capability of utilizing Cross Laminated Timber as a

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
12:
manageable construction answer for Multi-story structures. This additional learning will help
address the prominent holes in the writing, as the research will particularly target expanding
information particular to the Brisbane setting. To industry, this research would like to illuminate
and instruct potential financial specialists, engineers, manufacturer and other invested
individuals on what can be normal while using this material. Through giving extra data these
gatherings can be better educated on the specific parts of CLT and any potential boundaries
significant to Brisbane. Lessening the obstructions and questions in the selection of Cross
Laminated Timber.
Limitations of the Study
The study was restricted by various components. The overview's generally little
accommodation-based example, while not proposed to be illustrative, fell beneath the coveted
example measure; and an especially poor reaction rate was seen from specific professions (for
instance the number of surveyors). This might be clarified by a blend of the review length and
the broader marvel of declining reaction rates owing to study weariness. The online stage,
methods for circulation and study title may likewise have one-sided the overview towards
respondents from specific socio-economic and with particular positive or negative encounters
that they wished to share. The subjective approach of the study, while giving valuable
understanding into numerous inquiries, gives fragmented or clashing responses to a few
inquiries and relies on the impartial revealing of encounters by specialists.
While a significant number of the exhibited comes about help those gathered from different
studies of 'maintainable' or 'green' building, it stays hard to decide whether these comes about
reflect built up 'fantasies' inside the business or genuine, ordinary, encounters. By
counterbalancing study inquiries in both general terms and across an exhibit of particular
materials an endeavor was made to recognize the contrasts amongst recognitions and
encounters. Triangulation with talk with comes about additionally gave a more nuanced

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
13:
translation of study comes about. Nonetheless, there stay numerous uncertain inquiries.
Conclusive responses to a few inquiries, for example, regardless of whether low carbon
materials increment venture costs, can just, at last, be settled through the accumulation of true
cost information. This research hole could be tended to through contextual investigations or an
information accumulation venture by a built-up industry body, for example, the RICS. Without
such information, studying recognitions also, the base of cost increments can, in any case, give
understanding, as usually discernments as opposed to the truth that impacts take-up.
Other research holes exist in seeing how worries around exemplified carbon spread inside
customer associations and investigating the suggestions for material makers of a low
epitomized carbon future. Diminished utilization of ordinary materials and the more prominent
take-up of elective materials can possibly meddle with the current progression of the area,
decreasing the market offer of as of now overwhelming makers. This, thus, can possibly incur
considerable basic changes on the economy. It is obvious that more work should be done to
build up an exhaustive comprehension of these potential effects. Much extra information
gathering is expected to create powerful venture level benchmarks and a procedure is expected
to interface these with segment emanation diminishment targets. Additionally, research is
required to determine the open deliberation around the most proper methods for managing
exemplified carbon and a detailed proposition require improvement.
Recommendations and Conclusions
The chief target of this study was to comprehend the financial, specialized, down to earth and
social hindrances keeping construction experts from choosing an assortment of materials
ordinarily distinguished as being lower in encapsulated carbon. A survey of past studies
evaluating boundaries to decreasing operational outflows also, receiving more maintainable
practices in the construction business uncovered a typical arrangement of social and
institutional hindrances. The outcomes exhibited in this paper unequivocally recommend that
these boundaries likewise avoid elective material decision as a method for alleviating
exemplified carbon emanations. A significant number of these hindrances are regular across

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
14:
materials with take-up limited by an impression of high costs; a lack of learning and aptitudes;
insufficient outline time to permit thought of novel choices; deficient data from material
makers and a powerlessness to build up a viable or aggregate chain of duty.
Configuration groups are additionally hampered by the poor accessibility of item and building
level cell-based information and benchmarks. The construction business can look to defeat
these boundaries by empowering prior commitment of supply chains, successful utilization of
entire life costing, and changes to contract and delicate reports. Extra preparing is required for
some professionals and firms participating in their first encapsulated carbon evaluations must
have structures set up to guarantee to take in is moved over from venture to extend and spread
inside. The business should likewise share the collected learning on exemplified carbon. This
incorporates transferring information to normal storehouses to take into consideration
benchmarking; sharing institutionalized revealing structures and straightforwardly talking about
their victories and disappointments. The business must not sit tight for direction to act but
rather keep on building upon the developing business case and be proactive in urging
customers to take part in the evaluation.
A developing number of firms have taken a shot at ventures where epitomized carbon has been
estimated and diminished. Effective ventures ordinarily advantage from some profoundly
energetic customer that spots clear and testing necessities in the delicate records, basic
motivating forces in contracts, and supports the early commitment of the full production
network. There is a reasonable open door for customers to spur additional activity on typified
carbon without empowering enactment. Customers should likewise be proactive in sharing
their aptitude and encounters, taking into account commonly gainful upgrades, for example,
institutionalizing encapsulated carbon-announcing frames for subcontractors.
Drawn in people inside customer associations should look for to incorporate encapsulated
carbon evaluation inside their obligatory or deliberate carbon exposure to installing thought
and persistent change inside their association. There is a part for proficient organizations to
encourage this information exchange amongst firms and encourage an exemplified carbon

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
15:
group. Foundations can give instructional classes and direction; support key exhibit ventures;
autonomously accumulate cost information to substance out the business case and help
disperse lessons learned by early performing artists. At last, be that as it may, the direction will
likewise be required to expand upon the early work of good pioneers.
In various real nations, there is a developing industry acknowledgment that typified carbon
ought to be managed in some frame. Governments can give clarity by setting a long-haul
direction for such control. The emphasis ought to be on giving conviction by quickly setting up a
trade for the normal Zero Carbon directions and counseling on favored methods for controlling
encapsulated carbon. There is a reasonable part of foundations and industry promotion
gatherings to add to this level-headed discussion, by encouraging occasions, for example, the
Alliance for Sustainable Building Products Embodied Carbon: Why, how and when? Verbal
confrontation. Meanwhile, governments may likewise wish to consider more radical
administrative choices; an illustration would incorporate typified carbon of new offices in a
compulsory GHG emission reports as prerequisites for public organizations and stretching out
this enactment to cover extra firms.
Likewise, local experts may wish to present their own compulsory necessities inside the
planning procedure or give money related motivating forces, for example, diminished board
duty or business rates for model low carbon properties. Besides, open division customers can
likewise show others how it’s done, by presenting obligatory necessities for exemplified carbon
appraisal; empowering utilization of elective materials on open activities. The Government
through their related research associations may likewise wish to support undertakings to create
key data hotspots for professionals, for example, a brought together the database for Life Cycle
Inventory information.
There is an unmistakable open door for typified carbon decrease to have a noteworthy impact
in meeting progressively difficult carbon spending plans in numerous nations. Early activity and
control could bolster the quick advancement of aptitude, speedier information gathering and
the development of an industry with huge fare potential. There is an unmistakable open door

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
16:
for early performing artists to wind up world pioneers in a developing industry that will bolster
talented employments, build up the market for elective materials and accomplish huge
diminishments in GHG discharges or emissions.

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
17:
References
Bacchini, S. C. (2016). An A-Z of applied linguistics research methods. Reference Reviews, 30(8), 17-17.
Brandner R., Flatscher G., Ringhofer A., Schickhofer G. & Thiel A. (2016). Cross laminated timber (CLT):
overview and development. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 331–351.
Byung G.K, Francis E., Andrew P. & Tony T. (2014). The application of causality to construction business
ethics. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(3), 550-568.
Calvert, P. (2013). Research Methods in Information. The Electronic Library, 31(5), 682-683.
Chaffey, D. (2016). Global Social Media research summary. Smart Insights.
Charles G. P., Gerald R. A. & Daniel R. H. (2011). Journal ranking analyses of operations management
research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(3), 405-422.
Fiegen, A. M. (2010). Systematic review of research methods: the case of business instruction. Reference
Services Review, 38(3), 385-397.
Giesekam J., Barrett J.R & Taylor P. (2016). Construction sector views on low carbon building materials.
Building Research & Information, 44(4), 423–444.
Guha, M. (2014). APA Dictionary of Statistics and Research Methods. Reference Reviews, 28(5), 8-9.
Hardie M. & Newell G. (2011). Factors influencing technical innovation in construction SMEs: an
Australian perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(6), 618–
636.
Harris, R. (2015). Cross laminated timber. In M. P. Ansell, Wood Composites (pp. 141–167). Woodhead
Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-454-3.00008-1
Jauk G. & Höfler S. (2017). Triumph of CLT continues. Retrieved May 23, 2018, from Timber Online:
https://www.timber-online.net/holzprodukte/2017/11/siegeszug-von-bsp-setzt-sich-fort.html
Jennifer, F. (2017). Customisable framework for project risk management. Construction Innovation,
17(1), 68-89.
Johnston C.M.T. & Cornelis van Kooten G. (2015). Back to the past: Burning wood to save the globe.
Ecological Economics, 120(1), 185–193.
Jones K., Stegemann J., Sykes J. & Winslow P. (2016). Adoption of unconventional approaches in
construction: The case of cross-laminated timber. Construction and Building Materials, 125(1),
690–702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.088
Kremer P.D. & Symmons M.A. (2015). Mass timber construction as an alternative to concrete and steel
in the Australia building industry: a PESTEL Evaluation of the potential. International Wood
Products Journal, 6(3), 138–147.

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
18:
Lehmann, S. (2012). Sustainable Construction for Urban Infill Development Using Engineered Massive
Wood Panel Systems. Sustainability, 4(10), 2707–2742.
Lin F.H, Tsai S.B, Lee Y.C, Hsiao C.F, Zhou J., Wang J. & Shang Z. (2017). Empirical research on Kano’s
model and customer satisfaction . PLOS ONE, 12(9), 1-22.
Lindgren J. & Emmitt S. (2017). Diffusion of a systemic innovation: A longitudinal case study of a Swedish
multi-storey timber housebuilding system. ; London, 17(1),. Construction Innovation, 17(1), 25–
44.
Östman, B. (2017). Fire performance of wood products and timber structures. International Wood
Products Journal, 8(2), 74–79.
Passarelli R.N. & Koshihara M. (2017). CLT panels in Japan from cradle to construction site gate: global
warming potential and freight costs impact of three supply options. International Wood
Products Journal, 8(2), 127–136.
Robert L. H & Timothy M. R. (2011). Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qualitative Market
Research: An International Journal, 12(3), 7-26.
Satish K. M. & Rajesh P. (2014). Business Research in India. Journal of Management Development, 28(4),
68-74.
Seonaidh M., Bee C.G., Simon S.F., Adekunle O. & Alistair R.A. (2015). A review of research methods in
entrepreneurship 1985-2013. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research,
21(3), 291-315.
Shankar R. K. & Shankarappa H. T. (2016). Global research on air pollution between 2005 and 2014: a
bibliometric study. Collection Building, 31(1), 84-92.
Sillett S. C., Van Pelt R., Koch G.W., Ambrose A.R., Carroll A.L., Antoine M.E. & Mifsud B.M. (2010).
Increasing wood production through old age in tall trees. Forest Ecology and Management,
259(5), 976–994.
Snell D. & Fairbrother P. (2011). Toward a Theory of Union Environmental Politics: Unions and Climate
Action in Australia. Labor Studies Journal, 36(1), 83–103.
Sorensen, J. (2016). B.C. focus on wood reshaping the construction industry. Journal of Commerce, 30(2),
19–22.
Svensson, G. (2013). Processes of substantiations and contributions through theory building towards
theory in business research. European Business Review, 14(5), 466-480.
Tam V.W.Y. & Hao J.J.L. (2014). Prefabrication as a mean of minimizing construction waste on site.
International Journal of Construction Management, 14(2), 113–121.
Xia B., O’Neill T., Zuo J., Skitmore M. & Chen Q. (2014). (2014). Perceived obstacles to multi-storey
timber-frame construction: an Australian study. Architectural Science Review, 57(3), 169–176.

USING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
19:
Yin, R. (2009). Case Study Research : design and methods. Thousand Oaks, California : Sage Publications.