Validation and Confirmation: Exploring Research and Theory in Nursing

This assignment delves into the concepts of validation and confirmation within the context of research, specifically focusing on their application in nursing and theory development. The solution begins by highlighting the distinction between the two terms, emphasizing that confirmation often validates qualitative findings, while validation is used for quantitative and measurable results. It references key sources like Chinn & Kramer (2013) and Gunter (2014) to support its arguments, discussing how these concepts are crucial for substantiating, modifying, and proposing evidence in research. The assignment emphasizes the importance of interpreting data and numbers to understand their implications in practice, highlighting how empirical evidence is used to validate theories and answer research questions. It also discusses the process of identifying new ideas and validating theories in practice, emphasizing the need to assess and evaluate theoretical relationships to understand the similarities and differences between the two concepts.

Running head: VALIDATION AND CONFIRMATION 1
Validation and Confirmation
Name
Institution

VALIDATION AND CONFIRMATION 2
VALIDATION AND CONFIRMATION
Q1:
Incredible piece! I like how you have organized this writing. First, it is fantastic how you
have cited the source in explaining where the two terms are used. It is true that both phrases are
utilized in characterizing and authenticating empiric processes. Moreover, I am inspired by how
you have first acknowledged the similarity between the two terms, but going further to
distinguishing them by saying that confirmation verifies qualitative and natural findings whereas
validation verifies quantitative and measurable results. I am also inspired when you highlight the
key position from Chin & Kramer study that cognitively-based theoretic processes for
development of knowledge remain the most significant in research usefulness determination.
Also, it is worth appreciating how to recognize the importance of interpretation and meaning of
data and numbers as this is the only means we can understand what they denote and their
application in practice. The numbers in empirical research means the variables assigned to items
under study to help in the analysis of the outcome. This help the researcher to apply the best
practices in their work. The numbers mean empirical evidence used in the validation of theories
in practice. The researcher uses this numbers to quantify evidence to apply them in answering
empirical questions based on data.
Q 2:
Awesome distinction! From the onset, it is essential to appreciate how you have hooked
up your discussion. By highlighting the aspects of confirmation and validation, you get to grab
the attention of the reader. For example, it is necessary to substantiate, modify and propose
evidence in research and theory development (Gunter, 2014). Also, by redefining conceptual
meanings and assessing and evaluating theoretical relationships, we get to understand the

VALIDATION AND CONFIRMATION 3
distinction and similarities of the two phrases. Your discussion cleverly gives the process leading
to the use of the two concepts in research (Chinn & Kramer, 2013). For example, you have
shown that their need arises from the identification of new ideas which make theory influence
the practice. Thus, there is a need to validate and confirm the theory in practice. By identifying
the similarity between practice- and theory variables, we get to validate and confirm the
soundness of the resultant theory in practice.

VALIDATION AND CONFIRMATION 4
References
Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (2013). Integrated Theory & Knowledge Development in
Nursing-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Gunter, L. M. (2014). Confirmation and validation of empiric knowledge using
research. Knowledge development in nursing: Theory and process, 210.