Analysis of Market Entry Strategy of Vivo
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/12
|12
|3483
|264
AI Summary
This article analyzes the market entry strategy of Vivo, a leading global smartphone company, into the Indian market. It discusses the challenges faced by the company and the strategies adopted to capture the growing market of smartphones in India. The article also provides an overview of the smart phone industry in India, the customer requirements, and the competition among the leading brands. It further explains the different market entry strategies adopted by companies and how Vivo has used these strategies to establish its position in the Indian market.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
Analysis of market entry strategy of Vivo
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author note
Analysis of market entry strategy of Vivo
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
At a time when the industry of telecommunication stepped into the era of smart phone,
Vivo marked its presence in the Indian smart phones industry. The leading brand of global smart
phone company has started its journey in the year of 2009, as a sub brand of the company BBK
electronics (Vivo.com 2018). Later in 2011, the china based company entered into the world of
telecommunication with landline phones and wireless telecommunication sets. The company has
addressed the market trend during the evolution of smart phones and started manufacturing its
own range of smart phones in the year of 2014. The primary aim of this smart phone brand is to
provide quality products as well as services at an affordable price. Vivo brought the innovation
in the sphere of smart phone while making the customer’s life easier (Vivo.com 2018).
In industry that is highly competitive, the smart phone brand vivo entered with a strategy to
provide best features of a smart hone at a low price. At a time, when the renowned brands like
Samsung, Microsoft and others was competition with each other to serve the best smart
experience in the industry, Vivo, addressed that the market need and brought revolutionary
changes in camera specification (Statista 2018). It launched its product range in the global
market with the high quality camera in order to attract the maximum customer area.
In order to capture the growing sphere of smart phone of India, Vivo entered into the
Indian economy in the year of 2014. Launching it first smart phone model for the Indian market
the company embarked into the competition with other giant brands like Samsung, Microsoft and
many more (Statista 2018). As the Indian market of smart phone is price sensitive, the company
intended introduce such a price range that is competitive in the market. The Vivo smart phone
series available in the market has overall best features in it. Meanwhile keeping the market trend
in mind and to compete in the industry, it designs its products in a way attracts the attention of
the customers to buy it (Vivo.com 2018).
At a time when the industry of telecommunication stepped into the era of smart phone,
Vivo marked its presence in the Indian smart phones industry. The leading brand of global smart
phone company has started its journey in the year of 2009, as a sub brand of the company BBK
electronics (Vivo.com 2018). Later in 2011, the china based company entered into the world of
telecommunication with landline phones and wireless telecommunication sets. The company has
addressed the market trend during the evolution of smart phones and started manufacturing its
own range of smart phones in the year of 2014. The primary aim of this smart phone brand is to
provide quality products as well as services at an affordable price. Vivo brought the innovation
in the sphere of smart phone while making the customer’s life easier (Vivo.com 2018).
In industry that is highly competitive, the smart phone brand vivo entered with a strategy to
provide best features of a smart hone at a low price. At a time, when the renowned brands like
Samsung, Microsoft and others was competition with each other to serve the best smart
experience in the industry, Vivo, addressed that the market need and brought revolutionary
changes in camera specification (Statista 2018). It launched its product range in the global
market with the high quality camera in order to attract the maximum customer area.
In order to capture the growing sphere of smart phone of India, Vivo entered into the
Indian economy in the year of 2014. Launching it first smart phone model for the Indian market
the company embarked into the competition with other giant brands like Samsung, Microsoft and
many more (Statista 2018). As the Indian market of smart phone is price sensitive, the company
intended introduce such a price range that is competitive in the market. The Vivo smart phone
series available in the market has overall best features in it. Meanwhile keeping the market trend
in mind and to compete in the industry, it designs its products in a way attracts the attention of
the customers to buy it (Vivo.com 2018).
2ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
Within few months of its entry in the market Vivo has achieved a considerable profit
from smart phone industry. Presently, the company serves over 40 cities of 22 states in the
country. As per the market observe, the company has been able to give a tough competition with
the giant brand that already had e good hold of customers in the market. In the year of 2016, the
company introduced its major model of smart phone in order to strengthen its market position in
the country. As a result of its innovative development of products, the company has witnessed
significant sales in the past two years. Along with that, the demand of the Vivo smart phones is
considerably high in the industry. Within three months of its launch of smart phone series in
India, the company gained 21% share in the market. In the year of 2017, it also has acquired 7
percent market share (Statista 2018). Over the four years of existence in the Indian market, Vive
has become a reliable brand of quality smart phones (Vivo.com 2018).
The smart phone industry is one of the largest industries in India that grows in a rapid
speed. As the industry is growing rapidly, the customer requirement is also changing day by day.
The leading brands as well as the new entrants in the industry are in continuous competition to
serve new features to the customers in order to have a good hold of customers in the market
(Mohan 2014). As per the reports, 2.5 million devices have been sold by the second quarter of
the year 2017.
As the industry grows in rapid pace, a significant amount of new companies have been
entering in the industry with new offers. Companies like Oppo, Redmi and Lenovo are
continuously innovating new features and including them into their products, which push Vivo
also to develop its product range and modify the product specifications (Vikram and Ramanathan
2015). As Indian economy allows small to large companies to entry so that the economic growth
of the country can increase, the smart brands focuses on low price strategy to target the
Within few months of its entry in the market Vivo has achieved a considerable profit
from smart phone industry. Presently, the company serves over 40 cities of 22 states in the
country. As per the market observe, the company has been able to give a tough competition with
the giant brand that already had e good hold of customers in the market. In the year of 2016, the
company introduced its major model of smart phone in order to strengthen its market position in
the country. As a result of its innovative development of products, the company has witnessed
significant sales in the past two years. Along with that, the demand of the Vivo smart phones is
considerably high in the industry. Within three months of its launch of smart phone series in
India, the company gained 21% share in the market. In the year of 2017, it also has acquired 7
percent market share (Statista 2018). Over the four years of existence in the Indian market, Vive
has become a reliable brand of quality smart phones (Vivo.com 2018).
The smart phone industry is one of the largest industries in India that grows in a rapid
speed. As the industry is growing rapidly, the customer requirement is also changing day by day.
The leading brands as well as the new entrants in the industry are in continuous competition to
serve new features to the customers in order to have a good hold of customers in the market
(Mohan 2014). As per the reports, 2.5 million devices have been sold by the second quarter of
the year 2017.
As the industry grows in rapid pace, a significant amount of new companies have been
entering in the industry with new offers. Companies like Oppo, Redmi and Lenovo are
continuously innovating new features and including them into their products, which push Vivo
also to develop its product range and modify the product specifications (Vikram and Ramanathan
2015). As Indian economy allows small to large companies to entry so that the economic growth
of the country can increase, the smart brands focuses on low price strategy to target the
3ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
customers. The market report says that among the smart phone companies, Samsung holds the
maximum market share in the industry that is 24% (Singh 2018). Xiaomi comes second with
17% and Vivo is in the third position with 13%. However, the growth rate of Vivo is
comparatively higher than the other brands. In a very short time span it achieved considerable
market share in the industry.
The smart phone industry of the country is price sensitive. Customers in India, tend to
compare between the brands before buying a mobile phone. They mainly look for product with
maximum features but at an affordable price. Only 7% of the whole population of India uses
Brands like Apple that follow high price strategy (Vikram and Ramanathan 2015).
The major group of customers using smart phones is the young generation which
accounts for around 61 % percentage. The second major group is the working professionals aged
between 23-40 years (Mohan 2014). The large group of smart phone users, which is the young
generation, looks for high quality camera other than any features while buying smart phones.
Thus, the smart phone companies focus on the feature of high quality camera to persuade the
customers to buy their products.
Many factors are there that affect the smart phone industry in India. Recently the
economic reformation in the name of demonetization had a huge impact on the overall sales of
the industry. The purchasing power of the customers too lowered during the initial period
(Watkins Kitner and Mehta 2013). Therefore, it can be said that the Indian industry of smart
phone is economically unstable. Meanwhile, another aspect geographical diversification has a
significant influence on the industry. Sometimes it becomes challenge for the smart phone
customers. The market report says that among the smart phone companies, Samsung holds the
maximum market share in the industry that is 24% (Singh 2018). Xiaomi comes second with
17% and Vivo is in the third position with 13%. However, the growth rate of Vivo is
comparatively higher than the other brands. In a very short time span it achieved considerable
market share in the industry.
The smart phone industry of the country is price sensitive. Customers in India, tend to
compare between the brands before buying a mobile phone. They mainly look for product with
maximum features but at an affordable price. Only 7% of the whole population of India uses
Brands like Apple that follow high price strategy (Vikram and Ramanathan 2015).
The major group of customers using smart phones is the young generation which
accounts for around 61 % percentage. The second major group is the working professionals aged
between 23-40 years (Mohan 2014). The large group of smart phone users, which is the young
generation, looks for high quality camera other than any features while buying smart phones.
Thus, the smart phone companies focus on the feature of high quality camera to persuade the
customers to buy their products.
Many factors are there that affect the smart phone industry in India. Recently the
economic reformation in the name of demonetization had a huge impact on the overall sales of
the industry. The purchasing power of the customers too lowered during the initial period
(Watkins Kitner and Mehta 2013). Therefore, it can be said that the Indian industry of smart
phone is economically unstable. Meanwhile, another aspect geographical diversification has a
significant influence on the industry. Sometimes it becomes challenge for the smart phone
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
4ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
companies to set their product strategy. At the same time, the government of the country pushes
the leading brands to produce smart phones that support iris-based authentication.
There are few strategies that companies adopt before entering into an industry. When a
company decides to enter an overseas industry a variety of aspects are there to analyze before,
such as risk, costs and controlling power in the industry (Vikram and Ramanathan 2015). Thus,
market entry strategy can be defined as the planned method of serving products and services in a
target customer area and market them there.
A company willing to enter in the overseas market, experiences three major challenges in
terms of marketing, sourcing and investment and control.
The challenges of marketing includes the country, which the company intends to enter,
the market segments and managing them, whereas the sourcing refers to obtaining products,
manufacturing or buying (Glowik 2016). Investment and control means partnership and
controlling power of the company in the new industry.
The market entry strategies are:
Exporting,
Franchising,
Contract manufacturing,
Completely owned manufacturing facilities,
Turnkey contracts,
Licensing,
Joint venturing,
Mergers and acquisition,
companies to set their product strategy. At the same time, the government of the country pushes
the leading brands to produce smart phones that support iris-based authentication.
There are few strategies that companies adopt before entering into an industry. When a
company decides to enter an overseas industry a variety of aspects are there to analyze before,
such as risk, costs and controlling power in the industry (Vikram and Ramanathan 2015). Thus,
market entry strategy can be defined as the planned method of serving products and services in a
target customer area and market them there.
A company willing to enter in the overseas market, experiences three major challenges in
terms of marketing, sourcing and investment and control.
The challenges of marketing includes the country, which the company intends to enter,
the market segments and managing them, whereas the sourcing refers to obtaining products,
manufacturing or buying (Glowik 2016). Investment and control means partnership and
controlling power of the company in the new industry.
The market entry strategies are:
Exporting,
Franchising,
Contract manufacturing,
Completely owned manufacturing facilities,
Turnkey contracts,
Licensing,
Joint venturing,
Mergers and acquisition,
5ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
Counter trade
Third country location
Exporting: the most traditional strategy is exporting that the companies adopt in order to
operate in foreign markets. Exporting refer to the marketing of products from the country where
the products have been produced to another country. In order to market the products
successfully, significant invest is required (Glowik 2016). A company willing export in a foreign
country needs to make strategies and plans in terms of product specification, price, and
distribution and most importantly in terms of promotions. The response of export mainly
depends on the demand of the product in that selected country.
Franchising: The practice of using the supplier company’s business model is known as
Franchising. The company whose business model is followed needs to be a successful business
in its domain (Holtbrügge and Baron 2013). A franchisee distributes the supplier company’s
product in the country using the trademark the company’s trademark. The operator or the
franchisee pays a fee to the supplier company for using its trademark. Franchise can be
considered as the alternative to the ‘chain stores’ in order to distribute the products (Varghese
and Doshi 2013). The companies adopt the strategy of franchising in order to avoid the liability
and investments of the chain stores because franchisees possess a direct stake in the supplier’s
business.
Licensing: Licensing refers to the method through which a giant company of one country
allows a company in another country to manufacture its products. Licensing is quite similar to
the franchisee however; licensing demands little more expense than franchisee operation (Laufs
Counter trade
Third country location
Exporting: the most traditional strategy is exporting that the companies adopt in order to
operate in foreign markets. Exporting refer to the marketing of products from the country where
the products have been produced to another country. In order to market the products
successfully, significant invest is required (Glowik 2016). A company willing export in a foreign
country needs to make strategies and plans in terms of product specification, price, and
distribution and most importantly in terms of promotions. The response of export mainly
depends on the demand of the product in that selected country.
Franchising: The practice of using the supplier company’s business model is known as
Franchising. The company whose business model is followed needs to be a successful business
in its domain (Holtbrügge and Baron 2013). A franchisee distributes the supplier company’s
product in the country using the trademark the company’s trademark. The operator or the
franchisee pays a fee to the supplier company for using its trademark. Franchise can be
considered as the alternative to the ‘chain stores’ in order to distribute the products (Varghese
and Doshi 2013). The companies adopt the strategy of franchising in order to avoid the liability
and investments of the chain stores because franchisees possess a direct stake in the supplier’s
business.
Licensing: Licensing refers to the method through which a giant company of one country
allows a company in another country to manufacture its products. Licensing is quite similar to
the franchisee however; licensing demands little more expense than franchisee operation (Laufs
6ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
and Schwens 2014). In order to implement the operation, both of the giant company as well as
the other company required to sign legal agreement.
Joint ventures: Joint venture is one of the most common strategies that the organizations
use in order to enter in a foreign market. In this strategy, two or more investors involve to share
the ownership of the enterprise (Johnson 2016). All the investors share control over the
operations as well as the property of the enterprise. In order to enter in the industry, a foreign
enterprise collaborates with a local enterprise while strengthening the economy of the company
(Laufs and Schwens 2014).
Counter trade: Counter trade is the indirect way of exporting strategy. The foreign
companies invest more in the marketing of products (Holtbrügge and Baron 2013). Counter trade
is adopted by the organizations for the markets where competition is less and mode of
transaction is based on currency. In many countries, counter trade is used to encourage the home
industries (Johnson 2016).
Turnkey contracts: the agreement between the seller and the buyer in order to construct
and design of a project that will be ready to use after it is handed over to the client is generally
known as the turnkey contracts (Varghese and Doshi 2013). This type of strategy is mainly used
in the food chain business where the contractor to sub contractor is responsible for designing as
well as building of the project or facility.
Contract manufacturing: Some companies make contracts with firms located in foreign
countries in order to manufacture the products (Johnson 2016). Most of the international
companies like Ponds use this practice to while entering into a foreign company.
and Schwens 2014). In order to implement the operation, both of the giant company as well as
the other company required to sign legal agreement.
Joint ventures: Joint venture is one of the most common strategies that the organizations
use in order to enter in a foreign market. In this strategy, two or more investors involve to share
the ownership of the enterprise (Johnson 2016). All the investors share control over the
operations as well as the property of the enterprise. In order to enter in the industry, a foreign
enterprise collaborates with a local enterprise while strengthening the economy of the company
(Laufs and Schwens 2014).
Counter trade: Counter trade is the indirect way of exporting strategy. The foreign
companies invest more in the marketing of products (Holtbrügge and Baron 2013). Counter trade
is adopted by the organizations for the markets where competition is less and mode of
transaction is based on currency. In many countries, counter trade is used to encourage the home
industries (Johnson 2016).
Turnkey contracts: the agreement between the seller and the buyer in order to construct
and design of a project that will be ready to use after it is handed over to the client is generally
known as the turnkey contracts (Varghese and Doshi 2013). This type of strategy is mainly used
in the food chain business where the contractor to sub contractor is responsible for designing as
well as building of the project or facility.
Contract manufacturing: Some companies make contracts with firms located in foreign
countries in order to manufacture the products (Johnson 2016). Most of the international
companies like Ponds use this practice to while entering into a foreign company.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
7ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
Third country location: It has been seen that, some countries do not have good relation
between them. In such cases, when the companies of one the countries want to enter in the
economy of the other, they find it difficult (Glowik 2016). As a solution to this issue, the
companies operate from the third country base so that they can enter into market of that foreign
country.
Mergers and acquisition: Popularly known as the expansion strategy, two or more
companies adopt approaches of merge, acquisition and consolidation and so on (Varghese and
Doshi 2013). This strategy helps the companies to grow in a rapid pace in terms of entering into
a market. Mainly the acquisition of the technology is the main aspect for this type of market
entry strategy (Glowik 2016).
Fully owned manufacturing: Some companies in order to acquire long term benefits by
expanding g their business in a foreign country, establish completely owned manufacturing units
in that country (Holtbrügge and Baron 2013). Most of the organizations in order to avoid the
excessive cost of exporting, issues regarding trade relation, government policies of exportation
often adopt this strategy (Johnson 2016).
In order to capture the growing market of the smart phones in India, the company Vivo
has adopted different strategies. Initially, the company has started entering into the Indian smart
phone industry by exporting its large variety of product range (Vikram and Ramanathan 2015).
After it achieved its expected profit margin and the positive response from the Indian market, it
had established its fully owned manufacturing cum assembly unit in the country. Through
applying the strategy, Vivo has been able to minimize the cost of exporting of the products
Third country location: It has been seen that, some countries do not have good relation
between them. In such cases, when the companies of one the countries want to enter in the
economy of the other, they find it difficult (Glowik 2016). As a solution to this issue, the
companies operate from the third country base so that they can enter into market of that foreign
country.
Mergers and acquisition: Popularly known as the expansion strategy, two or more
companies adopt approaches of merge, acquisition and consolidation and so on (Varghese and
Doshi 2013). This strategy helps the companies to grow in a rapid pace in terms of entering into
a market. Mainly the acquisition of the technology is the main aspect for this type of market
entry strategy (Glowik 2016).
Fully owned manufacturing: Some companies in order to acquire long term benefits by
expanding g their business in a foreign country, establish completely owned manufacturing units
in that country (Holtbrügge and Baron 2013). Most of the organizations in order to avoid the
excessive cost of exporting, issues regarding trade relation, government policies of exportation
often adopt this strategy (Johnson 2016).
In order to capture the growing market of the smart phones in India, the company Vivo
has adopted different strategies. Initially, the company has started entering into the Indian smart
phone industry by exporting its large variety of product range (Vikram and Ramanathan 2015).
After it achieved its expected profit margin and the positive response from the Indian market, it
had established its fully owned manufacturing cum assembly unit in the country. Through
applying the strategy, Vivo has been able to minimize the cost of exporting of the products
8ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
(Holtbrügge and Baron 2013). Meanwhile, the other issues regarding trade relation was also
addressed by the Vivo through this strategy.
Vivo aimed to reach out to maximum customer target by providing the smart phone
ranges with maximum features in the industry. It mainly focused on the camera and the high
quality photograph to compete with the large smart phone brands in the industry (Glowik 2016).
Vivo could address that there is a growing demand of the best quality camera within the industry
and it planned its market strategy accordingly. The company presently secured its position
among the top brands of smart phones in India (Varghese and Doshi 2013). The market demand
of Vivo products is also high as its offers innovative features with latest design, which gives a
tough competition to the brands like Samsung, Microsoft, Oppo, Xiaomi and many more. As the
Indian market of the smart phones is price sensitive, the offers best features of a smart phone at
an affordable price (Varghese and Doshi 2013).
To hold the industry, the also has used several marketing strategies to promote its brand
in the country. Renowned celebrities from the film industry are hired to feature in the
promotional advertisement of the company (Sadafule 2014). As a part of its further plan of
expansion in the Indian economy, the smart phone brand Vivo it allowed many franchisees
across the nation, which in turn in order to avoid the liability and investments of the chain stores
(Andrews et al., 2016). As a result of different plans and strategies in enter in the market as well
as to hold the position in the industry, the clammy witnessed a significant amount of sales and
profit with a short time span (Kenney and Pon 2015).
The smart brand Vivo is one of the largest companies of telecommunication not only in
India but also across the world. The company has addressed the market trend during the
(Holtbrügge and Baron 2013). Meanwhile, the other issues regarding trade relation was also
addressed by the Vivo through this strategy.
Vivo aimed to reach out to maximum customer target by providing the smart phone
ranges with maximum features in the industry. It mainly focused on the camera and the high
quality photograph to compete with the large smart phone brands in the industry (Glowik 2016).
Vivo could address that there is a growing demand of the best quality camera within the industry
and it planned its market strategy accordingly. The company presently secured its position
among the top brands of smart phones in India (Varghese and Doshi 2013). The market demand
of Vivo products is also high as its offers innovative features with latest design, which gives a
tough competition to the brands like Samsung, Microsoft, Oppo, Xiaomi and many more. As the
Indian market of the smart phones is price sensitive, the offers best features of a smart phone at
an affordable price (Varghese and Doshi 2013).
To hold the industry, the also has used several marketing strategies to promote its brand
in the country. Renowned celebrities from the film industry are hired to feature in the
promotional advertisement of the company (Sadafule 2014). As a part of its further plan of
expansion in the Indian economy, the smart phone brand Vivo it allowed many franchisees
across the nation, which in turn in order to avoid the liability and investments of the chain stores
(Andrews et al., 2016). As a result of different plans and strategies in enter in the market as well
as to hold the position in the industry, the clammy witnessed a significant amount of sales and
profit with a short time span (Kenney and Pon 2015).
The smart brand Vivo is one of the largest companies of telecommunication not only in
India but also across the world. The company has addressed the market trend during the
9ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
evolution of smart phones and started manufacturing its own range of smart phones in the year of
2014. The primary aim of this smart phone brand is to provide quality products as well as
services at an affordable price. Vivo brought the innovation in the sphere of smart phone while
making the customer’s life easier. The study intends to analyze the strategies that have been
adopted by the smart phone company Vivo to enter in the Indian smart phone industry. The
strategies adopted by Vivo included exporting, fully owned manufacturing facilities and
franchising. During the initial days of its entry in the market of smart phones, it uses exporting
strategy. Gradually, after achieving a position in the market, the company set up its own
manufacturing unit with the strategy of franchising. The essay also discussed the other market
entry strategies apart from the strategies adopted by Vivo. Hence, in conclusion it can be said
that the study has tried to discuss all the aspects in order to understand the market entry strategies
by Vivo.
evolution of smart phones and started manufacturing its own range of smart phones in the year of
2014. The primary aim of this smart phone brand is to provide quality products as well as
services at an affordable price. Vivo brought the innovation in the sphere of smart phone while
making the customer’s life easier. The study intends to analyze the strategies that have been
adopted by the smart phone company Vivo to enter in the Indian smart phone industry. The
strategies adopted by Vivo included exporting, fully owned manufacturing facilities and
franchising. During the initial days of its entry in the market of smart phones, it uses exporting
strategy. Gradually, after achieving a position in the market, the company set up its own
manufacturing unit with the strategy of franchising. The essay also discussed the other market
entry strategies apart from the strategies adopted by Vivo. Hence, in conclusion it can be said
that the study has tried to discuss all the aspects in order to understand the market entry strategies
by Vivo.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
10ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
References
Andrews, M., Goehring, J., Hui, S., Pancras, J. and Thornswood, L., 2016. Mobile promotions:
A framework and research priorities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 34, pp.15-24.
Attri, R., Maheshwari, S. and Sharma, V., 2017. Customer Purchase Behavior for Smartphone
Brands. IUP Journal of Brand Management, 14(2).
Damayanti, D.D., 2018. THE EFFECT OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN AND PERCEIVED
QUALITY ON PURCHASE INTENTION (BRAND IMAGE AS THE MEDIATING ROLE
CASE STUDY: VIVO SMARTHPHONE IN PONTIANAK). Jurnal Manajemen Update, 7(1).
Davey, S. and Davey, A., 2014. Assessment of smartphone addiction in Indian adolescents: a
mixed method study by systematic-review and meta-analysis approach. International journal of
preventive medicine, 5(12), p.1500.
Glowik, M., 2016. Market Entry Strategies: Internationalization Theories, Concepts and Cases
of Asian High-Technology Firms: Haier, Hon Hai Precision, Lenovo, LG Electronics,
Panasonic, Samsung, Sharp, Sony, TCL, Xiaomi. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Holtbrügge, D. and Baron, A., 2013. Market entry strategies in emerging markets: An
institutional study in the BRIC countries. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(3),
pp.237-252.
Johnson, G., 2016. Exploring strategy: text and cases. Pearson Education.
Kenney, M. and Pon, B., 2015. Structuring the smartphone industry: is the mobile internet OS
platform the key?. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11(3), pp.239-261.
References
Andrews, M., Goehring, J., Hui, S., Pancras, J. and Thornswood, L., 2016. Mobile promotions:
A framework and research priorities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 34, pp.15-24.
Attri, R., Maheshwari, S. and Sharma, V., 2017. Customer Purchase Behavior for Smartphone
Brands. IUP Journal of Brand Management, 14(2).
Damayanti, D.D., 2018. THE EFFECT OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN AND PERCEIVED
QUALITY ON PURCHASE INTENTION (BRAND IMAGE AS THE MEDIATING ROLE
CASE STUDY: VIVO SMARTHPHONE IN PONTIANAK). Jurnal Manajemen Update, 7(1).
Davey, S. and Davey, A., 2014. Assessment of smartphone addiction in Indian adolescents: a
mixed method study by systematic-review and meta-analysis approach. International journal of
preventive medicine, 5(12), p.1500.
Glowik, M., 2016. Market Entry Strategies: Internationalization Theories, Concepts and Cases
of Asian High-Technology Firms: Haier, Hon Hai Precision, Lenovo, LG Electronics,
Panasonic, Samsung, Sharp, Sony, TCL, Xiaomi. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Holtbrügge, D. and Baron, A., 2013. Market entry strategies in emerging markets: An
institutional study in the BRIC countries. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(3),
pp.237-252.
Johnson, G., 2016. Exploring strategy: text and cases. Pearson Education.
Kenney, M. and Pon, B., 2015. Structuring the smartphone industry: is the mobile internet OS
platform the key?. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11(3), pp.239-261.
11ANALYSIS OF MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY OF VIVO
Laufs, K. and Schwens, C., 2014. Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized
enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Business
Review, 23(6), pp.1109-1126.
Mohan, A., 2014. Consumer behaviour towards smartphone industry in Indian market (Doctoral
dissertation, Dublin Business School).
Sadafule, R.D., 2014. Mobile app development for the Indian market. IEEE software, 31(3),
pp.17-20.
Singh, S.K., 2018. The diffusion of mobile phones in India. Telecommunications Policy, 32(9-
10), pp.642-651.
Varghese, T. and Doshi, R. 2013, Marketing Strategies Adopted to Capitalize Smartphone
Market by Chinese Smartphone Companys in Pimpri Chinchwad Area.
Vikram, K. and Ramanathan, K.V., 2015. A study on smartphone industry and their effects on
indian market an over view. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, 1.
Watkins, J., Kitner, K.R. and Mehta, D., 2013. Mobile and smartphone use in urban and rural
India. Continuum, 26(5), pp.685-697.
Vivo.com. 2018. About Vivo | Vivo India. [online] Available at: https://www.vivo.com/in-/about-
vivo [Accessed 22 Apr. 2018].
Statista. 2018. vivo smartphone sales worldwide 2015-2017 | Statistic. [online] Available at:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/541618/vivo-smartphone-shipments-worldwide/ [Accessed 22
Apr. 2018].
Laufs, K. and Schwens, C., 2014. Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized
enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Business
Review, 23(6), pp.1109-1126.
Mohan, A., 2014. Consumer behaviour towards smartphone industry in Indian market (Doctoral
dissertation, Dublin Business School).
Sadafule, R.D., 2014. Mobile app development for the Indian market. IEEE software, 31(3),
pp.17-20.
Singh, S.K., 2018. The diffusion of mobile phones in India. Telecommunications Policy, 32(9-
10), pp.642-651.
Varghese, T. and Doshi, R. 2013, Marketing Strategies Adopted to Capitalize Smartphone
Market by Chinese Smartphone Companys in Pimpri Chinchwad Area.
Vikram, K. and Ramanathan, K.V., 2015. A study on smartphone industry and their effects on
indian market an over view. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, 1.
Watkins, J., Kitner, K.R. and Mehta, D., 2013. Mobile and smartphone use in urban and rural
India. Continuum, 26(5), pp.685-697.
Vivo.com. 2018. About Vivo | Vivo India. [online] Available at: https://www.vivo.com/in-/about-
vivo [Accessed 22 Apr. 2018].
Statista. 2018. vivo smartphone sales worldwide 2015-2017 | Statistic. [online] Available at:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/541618/vivo-smartphone-shipments-worldwide/ [Accessed 22
Apr. 2018].
1 out of 12
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.