Vulnerability and Safeguarding

This article discusses the concept of vulnerability among the aged population, particularly old women, and the different forms of abuse that can increase vulnerability. It also explores the laws and principles of safeguarding adults, including the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Care Act 2014. The article emphasizes the importance of community involvement and emotional support in safeguarding vulnerable individuals.

Running head: VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
Vulnerability and Safeguarding
Name of student:
Name of university:
Author Note:

1VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
Vulnerability
The concept of vulnerability has been mainly prevalent among aged population,
predominantly among old women as compared to old men. Vulnerability can be identified
through assessing high risk groups or isolated individuals. Vulnerability among aged
population, particularly old women is the result of multiple complex interactions; the
individual is exposed to threats and failure to cope up with the exposed threats results in
vulnerable outcomes for that individual (Nicholson et al. 2013). Approach to a vulnerable
individual involves through identification of the risk factors of the exposure to threat. In old
age, coping capacities of an individual are integral in mitigating the chances of vulnerability;
individual capacity, social protection and capital resources provide strength to deal with
vulnerable threats and exposures in surroundings (Nicholson et al. 2013).
Different forms of abuse
Vulnerability is related to the discrete abusive outcomes which can increase an
individual’s degree of vulnerability. Different forms of abuse and neglect have been the
causal root of degrees of vulnerability among old population; sexual abuse, physical abuse,
psychological abuse for example exposure threats to abandon an individual or withdrawal of
support services from parents, domestic abuse, discriminatory abuse targeting age, religion,
gender, disability, financial abuse, neglect (Jackson and Hafemeister 2013).
Forms of abuse like neglect and self-neglect involve both the vulnerable individual
and the family members or care-giver. Neglect by others and self-neglect should not be
confused; self-neglect is a behavioral negligence in which an individual does not pay heed to
attend to the basic requirements of life (Lachs and Pillemer 2015). This basic requirements
may be in terms of proper clothing, proper personal hygiene, adequate dietary requirements
and attending to the timed medical requirements. On the contrary, neglect can be an abuse by

2VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
both the vulnerable individual and by the family or within the home. Poor hygiene and
grooming like lack of cleanliness, body full of dirt, matted or unclean hair, malnourishment,
foul smell of urine and faeces are some of physical signs to identify vulnerability (Iris,
Conrad and Ridings 2014).
Neglect and Self-neglect
Neglect as abuse can be identified by a multitude of determining signs like failure to
allow accessibility to foods and resources, isolation of a person and providing no access to
the vulnerable individual’s families. Both intentional and unintentional forms of neglect can
be a form of abuse. Intentional or wilful neglect is punishable according to Mental Capacity
Act 2005 (White and Baldwin 2016). Poor unhygienic surroundings and personal hygiene,
sores and infections, uncared due to reluctance in taking medical care, untreated wounds or
injuries and poor health conditions, lack of proper nutrition and failure to involve in social
interactions. Self-neglect involves lack of self-care which poses a threat to personal safety
and wellbeing, inability to seek support from care providers, negligence of house
maintenance and residing in filthy conditions with heaps of dirt and garbage all over,
unkempt personal appearance, hoarding, not complying with health professionals for follow-
up care as the identifying signs (Johannesen and LoGiudice 2013). The vulnerable people
often lacks mental capacity to make their own decisions necessary for self-care and
wellbeing. According to Mental capacity act 2005, the adult service providers engage and
involve the vulnerable individuals to make decisions for themselves. It has been hypothesized
that the older people in the community require the most attention for safeguarding; the older
people suffer from physical vulnerability due to physical immobility and inability to take care
of themselves, their children sometimes abandon them or stay away, their children often
show intentional lack of café and support to these individuals (Burnes et al., 2015). In certain
circumstances, the person is capable of taking decisions, however the decisions may pose

3VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
lack of care and serious risk to the person’s state of wellbeing. In such cases, it is necessary to
raise concern for that person and provide safeguarding services to enable the person live a
healthy life.
In the given case study involving Tereza, a 64year old woman, both neglect and self-
neglect has been evident in Tereza’s case. She is deficient in her physical abilities and
therefore she is unable to clean her flat which shows a heap of garbage scattered throughout
her flat. Tereza has been estranged by her daughter which is an example of neglect by her
daughter. Lack of personal hygiene has been observed for Tereza; her filthy clothes and
matted hair, infected ankles, widespread dirt and rubbish in her room are signs of self-
neglect. Tereza reported that she felt awful in her garbage-covered room. She expressed that
she would like to have a complete wash of her flat in order to get rid of uncleanliness. She
has physical immobility due to old age, however she has mental capacity to make decisions.
It is only her physical immobility that has refrained Tereza from any cleanliness activity. Her
mental ability allowed her to understand that my conversation with her would benefit her to
attain safety in health issues. Tereza has shared that she had no knowledge about
safeguarding; this may however mean that she might be agreeing to receive support from
health workers like me. However, she did not let me enter into her flat throughout the
conversation, which may indicate that Tereza might change her mind thereafter about seeking
support.
Safeguarding laws and principles
Elderly women who are at risk of vulnerability due to self-neglect or neglect by
family or any form of abuse require support and protection to enable them to live in safe
environment which is free from abuse and neglect. Initially neglect used to be included under
elderly abuse. It can be said that safeguarding adults is necessary to meet the needs of the

4VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
vulnerable elderly people and provide necessary support in order to help them lead a healthy
life and undergo a healthy aging (Graham et al. 2016). Various acts and legislations have
been made in order to safeguard adults. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 underlies five
principles in order to protect those vulnerable individuals who lack mental capacity to take
necessary relevant decisions. The Act provides beneficial principles to enable these
individuals to get involved in the decision making process and contribute as much as possible
without causing any harm (Foster and Herring 2015). According to this Act, the care
professionals should not assume a vulnerable person having mental capacity as always. They
should take all adequate practical measures to enable vulnerable people to make their own
decisions. The professionals should consider individual interests of the vulnerable without
assuming about their mental capacities and encourage them to take active part in decision
making (Series 2015). According to the Human Rights Act 1988, every individual has the
right to live a healthy lifestyle and have respect for both their personal and family life
(Tomuschat 2014). The Care Act 2014 lays out beneficial responsibilities that are aimed to
integrate both care and support to the vulnerable elderly population. The Act involves both
health as well as social organisations to work in collaboration and promote healthy wellbeing
within the communities. There are six key principles underlying any initiative on
safeguarding adults. The principle 1 states that a personalised form of relation needs to be
established with the vulnerable individual by the social and care professionals. Any decision
making process regarding provision of support services should involve the vulnerable
individuals and need to require informed consent. The vulnerable individual should be
informed how the support and care services would benefit in the healthy living. According to
principle 2, prevention forms a prior requirement as a concern before any harm can occur.
This means that the individuals who are at risk of vulnerability are informed beforehand to
understand the concept of abuse and recognise the indications of abuse (Boland, Burnage.

5VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
and Chowhan 2013). Principle 3 suggests proportionality, which means that the social and
health professionals would lend proportionate support so as to meet the requirements of the
vulnerable individuals. The professionals would reach only to that extent as required by the
individual. Principle 4 states about providing protection to safeguard the elderly people at risk
of vulnerability. This protection would aim to those individuals who are at greater risk.
According to principle 5, the health and social professionals would work in partnership with
the vulnerable individual and communities to bring about better and efficient support
services. Working in partnership would focus on maintaining the sensitive information of
vulnerable individual confidential and thereby help to build confidence within the vulnerable
individual that they would get adequate support and care from care professionals to improve
lifestyle (Stevens 2013). The principle 6 states about accountability and transparency in
rendering support and care to safeguard adults from risks of vulnerability.
Ideology of safeguarding
Considering Tereza’s condition which involves both self-neglect and neglect by her
daughter, the community neighbours, families and adult service providers need to take active
roles in protecting the vulnerable people. The local social and health organisations should
coordinate to reduce isolation for vulnerable people living alone. Continuous contact and
communication need to be made between the service providers and the vulnerable people.
The health care professionals should involve in providing physical support to perform day to
day activities for vulnerable old people. It is a collaborative role of the service providers to
identify the signs of self-neglect and neglect and assess the vulnerable individuals would
ensure that the concerning issues in improving her state of wellbeing is achieved. I would
engage with social organisations involved in safeguarding adults. I would work
collaboratively with the social organisations to arrange for physical support to Tereza. Tereza
needed regular physical support to perform cleaning activities in order to make her flat appear

6VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
clean and hygienic and thereby helping her to restore personal hygiene (Betts, Marks-Maran
and Morris-Thompson 2014). Tereza was not aware of the concept of safeguarding adults and
its necessity. It is necessary for adult service providers to contact the families and friends of
vulnerable people and involve them in making the vulnerable people understand about the
self-care approach and provision of support services in order to develop a healthy aging
process. The communities need to be alert and report to the adult service provider
organisations in cases of any vulnerable incidences. Having an enquiry with Tereza, I have
learnt that she has mental capacity to make decisions, however, due to physical immobility,
diabetes and old age, she was not being able to provide herself with the basic care to meet the
basic needs. Considering Tereza’s condition, Tereza cared least for her personal wellbeing. It
is necessary for the old age service providers to promote a welfare check on a community
basis. If the vulnerable people do not wish to take supportive care services from the service
providers, they should be respected for such decisions. No public laws or legislations demand
discriminating against vulnerable people if they choose to reside in poor hygienic conditions.
The six safeguarding principles underpinned by The Care Act 2014 needs to be followed in
case of Tereza to safeguard her and enable her to take decisions of her own regarding how
and what kind of care and support services she would wish to require from care professionals.
Tereza was estranged by her daughter and resided all alone in her flat filled with dirt and
garbage. Living lonely can result in emotional detachment causing depression and anxiety
(Charles and Luong 2013). Therefore safeguarding adults would also require provision of
emotional support to vulnerable elderly people. Evidences of the assessment of the physical
conditions need to be maintained and consulted with the safeguarding adult senior. Tereza
and other vulnerable individuals should be empowered so as to enable them to take active
part in community and social participation. The principles of the respective Acts need to be
followed by the social and health professionals. Involvement of multidisciplinary teams

7VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
would be statutory to meet every requirement of the vulnerable elderly people. A group of
professionals should provide for emotional support in order to prevent any depression and
anxiety from occurring. Focussing on emotional support of lonely elderly people is equally
important to promote mental wellness of these vulnerable people. Individual decisions of
vulnerable individuals should be recorded and collated; these should be discussed with the
members of safeguarding adults board and evaluated. The professionals should work in
groups and reach out to family members to advocate them about appropriate supportive roles
to the elderly to promote healthy aging and healthy lifestyle. The safeguarding principles
should be followed while involving the elderly individuals in self-decision making. They
should be listened patiently by the care providers, thereby respecting their dignity. The risk
factors for vulnerability like poverty, family connection, need to be assessed through proper
reliable assessment methods. The care providers need to be cautious while communicating
with the vulnerable elderly people, taking consideration that they have mental capacity to
understand. Calm and patient communication should be made with the vulnerable people
taking care to respect them so that they feel comfortable and safe within support services and
are therefore empowered to take active participation in their decisions for wellbeing (Braye,
Orr and Preston-Shoot 2015). It should be taken into consideration that elderly vulnerable
people like Tereza who possess mental capacity, can refuse to comply with the support
services they have previously agreed upon. The care professionals need to handle such
situations with care. Safeguarding adults to protect them abuse is essential to promote
wellbeing and healthy living. A multi-agency framework needs to be established to promote
safeguarding vulnerable adults. Efficiency in safeguarding adults could be reached through
clarification of the intermediate interface between quality of care and support service
provision and safeguarding principles (Huxhold, Miche and Schüz 2013). A general
awareness needs to be spread among the local communities, focussing on their active

8VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
participation in identifying, responding and reporting incidents of abuse and neglect to the
local organisations involved in safeguarding adults. Older people require dependence on
others to care for themselves and meet the basic necessities in life (Dodds 2014).
Safeguarding should be focussed on maintaining the privacy of information of these
individuals and services offered to them should maintain respect and dignity while these
vulnerable people take decisions.

9VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
References
Betts, V., Marks-Maran, D. and Morris-Thompson, T., 2014. Safeguarding vulnerable
adults. Nursing Standard, 28(38).
Boland, B., Burnage, J. and Chowhan, H., 2013. Safeguarding adults at risk of
harm. Bmj, 346, p.f2716.
Braye, S., Orr, D. and Preston-Shoot, M., 2015. Learning lessons about self-neglect? An
analysis of serious case reviews. The Journal of Adult Protection, 17(1), pp.3-18.
Burnes, D., Pillemer, K., Caccamise, P.L., Mason, A., Henderson Jr, C.R., Berman, J., Cook,
A.M., Shukoff, D., Brownell, P., Powell, M. and Salamone, A., 2015. Prevalence of and risk
factors for elder abuse and neglect in the community: a population‐based study. Journal of
the American Geriatrics Society, 63(9), pp.1906-1912.
Charles, S.T. and Luong, G., 2013. Emotional experience across adulthood: The theoretical
model of strength and vulnerability integration. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 22(6), pp.443-448.
Dodds, S., 2014. Dependence, care, and vulnerability. Vulnerability: New essays in ethics
and feminist philosophy, pp.181-203.
Foster, C. and Herring, J., 2015. Introduction. In Altruism, Welfare and the Law (pp. 1-5).
Springer, Cham.
Graham, K., Norrie, C., Stevens, M., Moriarty, J., Manthorpe, J. and Hussein, S., 2016.
Models of adult safeguarding in England: a review of the literature. Journal of Social
Work, 16(1), pp.22-46.

10VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
Huxhold, O., Miche, M. and Schüz, B., 2013. Benefits of having friends in older ages:
Differential effects of informal social activities on well-being in middle-aged and older
adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(3),
pp.366-375.
Iris, M., Conrad, K.J. and Ridings, J., 2014. Observational measure of elder self-
neglect. Journal of elder abuse & neglect, 26(4), pp.365-397.
Jackson, S. and Hafemeister, T.L., 2013. Financial abuse of elderly people vs. other forms of
elder abuse: Assessing their dynamics, risk factors, and society's response.
Johannesen, M. and LoGiudice, D., 2013. Elder abuse: A systematic review of risk factors in
community-dwelling elders. Age and ageing, 42(3), pp.292-298.
Lachs, M.S. and Pillemer, K.A., 2015. Elder abuse. New England Journal of
Medicine, 373(20), pp.1947-1956.
Nicholson, C., Meyer, J., Flatley, M. and Holman, C., 2013. The experience of living at home
with frailty in old age: a psychosocial qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing
Studies, 50(9), pp.1172-1179.
Nicholson, C., Meyer, J., Flatley, M. and Holman, C., 2013. The experience of living at home
with frailty in old age: a psychosocial qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing
Studies, 50(9), pp.1172-1179.
Series, L., 2015. Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support
paradigms. International journal of law and psychiatry, 40, pp.80-91.
Stevens, E., 2013. Safeguarding vulnerable adults: exploring the challenges to best practice
across multi-agency settings. The Journal of Adult Protection, 15(2), pp.85-95.
Tomuschat, C., 2014. Human rights: between idealism and realism. OUP Oxford.

11VULNERABILITY AND SAFEGUARDING
White, S.M. and Baldwin, T.J., 2016. The Mental Capacity Act 2005–implications for
anaesthesia and critical care. Anaesthesia, 61(4), pp.381-389.