The War of the Worlds Essay - Political and Moral Ideas
Verified
Added on 2023/06/10
|4
|740
|278
AI Summary
This essay analyzes the political and moral ideas presented in H.G Wells' The War of the Worlds. It critiques major aspects of society like religion and the military, and highlights the greed and selfishness of humankind.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: THE WAR OF THE WORLDS ESSAY THE WAR OF THE WORLDS ESSAY Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1THE WAR OF THE WORLDS ESSAY “The War of the Worlds” written by H.G Wells is a novel that has an immense political and moral ideas. He was an anti-colonialist and through his works, he portrayed the idea of superior races taking over inferior races to build empires. Based on the theory of evolution, Wells presented the novel as a story that shows.The struggle for survival and this concept is used throughout the book (Turner, Abrahams, & Harris, 2017). The greed and selfishness of humankind is portrayed using situations that are reflected in the novel. The theme of the novel is to criticize the major aspects of society like the religion; the military which presents the like facades that hides the primal nature of man. The ignorance of man is pointed out in the novel when the Martians arrive; humans treat them with curiosity rather than taking a direct measure to prevent further invasion. People watch the remarkable event from all the surrounding villages and cities but when the attack begins, they are helpless. It is even so because religion has taught men that they are all in the image of God, therefore superior to others (Rydell, 2013). Human kind experiences fear and they resort to defense. Instead of a victory, the world is in calamity due to the major invasion.Initially, there is where every one of the Martians is dead of infection. There are a bundle of pieces of information in the book that portend either that the Martians can be murdered or that it will be microorganisms that do the executing. For example, the main line of the book takes note of that the Martians are "as mortal" as man, so we know they can be slaughtered from the earliest starting point. The greater part of the glad stuff occurs in the short Book 2. Section 9, so we should proceed onward to Chapter 10, where things are less blushing. Truly, there's a feeling of humankind all being a piece of one major family, which is so sweet it gives us depressions. The storyteller begins to go frantic in the boulevards of London, and methodologies a Martian machine, with the expectation of executing himself. The storyteller has a mental meltdown and is
2THE WAR OF THE WORLDS ESSAY breast fed back to wellbeing by a kind family. In the end, he returns home, finding that his significant other is as yet alive (Cantril, 2017). The last piece of the book considers the importance of the new Earth, post-attack, and on the new questions and stresses that sustain the storyteller's psyche. Finally, one thing to note about the last section is that it appears to parallel the specific initial one (Clements, 2013). That is, both the first and the last parts begin with some bird's-eye perspective of the circumstance on how the Earth is getting along now and afterward moves into the storyteller's own story. Despite the fact that the substance of the story is uncertain and to some degree open-finished, there is a manner by which this closure appears like a fitting method to close the story.
3THE WAR OF THE WORLDS ESSAY REFERENCES Cantril, H. (2017).The invasion from Mars: A study in the psychology of panic. Routledge. Rydell, R. W. (2013).All the world's a fair: Visions of empire at American international expositions, 1876-1916. University of Chicago Press. Turner, V., Abrahams, R. D., & Harris, A. (2017).The ritual process: Structure and anti- structure. Routledge. Clements, C. S. (2013). Perception and Persuasion in Legal Argumentation: Using Informal Fallacies and Cognitive Biases to Win the War of the Worlds.BYU L. Rev., 319.