Benefits and Liabilities of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems of Democracy

This discussion compares the benefits and liabilities of Presidential and Parliamentary systems of democracy. It discusses the differences in the election of the chief executive and the legislative and executive branches present in the parliamentary system. The US President has a wide range of authority and power, but encounters certain limitations created by the standards of the separation of authorities in the constitution. In parliamentary systems, the chief executive is primarily elected by the citizens and not by the legislature. Furthermore, the combination of the legislative and executive branches present in the parliamentary system primarily aims to advance to an extensive amount of regulations among political party members.

Week 6 Discussion – Political Institutions
In readings for this week we find much discussion of parliaments. Parliaments are used in many different
forms of democratic government. Focus for reading was on comparison of House of Commons with
House of Representatives. We might compare also how the prime minister in the Westminster form of
parliament (UK) differs in duties from the president of the United States. In 300-500 words please
explain what you see are benefits and liabilities of each element of democracy.
RESPONSE:
The US President comprises a wide range of authority and power. it has been noted that the US
President can turn bills of Congress into law or acts of Congress. Moreover what is power the US
President can appoint every major Federal official which includes all Federal judges important members
of the present cabinet all foreign ambassadors along with every directors of Federal agencies as well as
other organizations. However, regardless of his range of powers the US President encounters certain
limitations created by the standards of the separation of authorities in the constitution. Peter (2005)
how stated that in the voting proceedings, the quorum tends to be present in both the chambers of
Congress. However, there can be identified fever prospects for delay by calling for a quorum.
On the other hand, Diller (2016) has claimed that the most distinctive parity between
Presidential and Parliamentary system relies on the process of election of the chief executive. In
parliament systems, it has been noted that the chief executive primarily is elected by the citizens and
not by the legislature. Furthermore significant proportion of party present in the parliament electricity
chief executive identified as the Prime minister. Nonetheless in few parliaments they can be identified
certain organized parties who have being represented whereby none have team majority. Thus, the
members of the parliament must proficiently decide among themselves regarding the election of the
Prime Minister. Furthermore, the combination of the legislative and executive branches present in the
parliamentary system primarily aims to advance to an extensive amount of regulations among political
party members. Diller (2016) as noted that party members in parliament typically vote in accordance to
party lines. Meanwhile Presidential regulations on the other hand, possesses a lesser degree of
disciplinary nature where legislatures do not face any limitations to vote their conscious with lesser
degree of consequences from the party.
Moreover, certain disagreements have tended to change between the two systems. Presidential
system legislators mainly utilize filibuster or the right in in order to extend speeches for upholding
certain legislative actions. Consequently, it has been noted that parliament system and authorities will
demand for cloture or an end to the disagreements in order to successfully initiate voting proceedings.

Week 6 Discussion – Political Institutions
References
Diller, P. A. (2016). Reorienting Home Rule: Part 1-The Urban Disadvantage in National and State
Lawmaking. La. L. Rev., 77, 287.
Petersen, R. E. (2005, May). Parliament and Congress: A Brief Comparison of the British House of
Commons and the US House of Representatives. Library of Congress Washington Dc
Congressional Research Service.