Writing Literature Reviews: A Reprise and Update

Writing Literature Reviews: A Reprise and Update
Communication is the most significant factor in an enterprise in every aspect, considering
the decision-making process, motivation, and employee performance. There are various ways to
present information and communicate to make another party understand the information. This
can be either oral or written form. The report purpose is to understand the writing
communication skills in the form of literature reviews. The key objective of the research is a
review of high quality publications that is human resource development review that is
specifically dedicated to reviewing articles. This would include an understanding of literature
review importance and major characteristics that make a literature review a better and effective
communication way to a large group of people for years (Callahan, 2014).
From the literature, it was identified that the key objective of the editorial was to regain
the focus of the readers or the author on aspects that considers for developing a good review
article. Moreover, it discussed the documentation of work in an effective way to make it
presentable and understandable. As per the scholar research, in 2015 Toronto presented an
integrative literature review in descriptive form, which was followed up by the scholar that had
identified various difference of character among conceptual frameworks, and integrative
literature reviews (Quirke, 2017).
Whilst conceptual frameworks and integrative literature review are the two maximum
commonplace styles of manuscripts posted in HRDR, different styles of review works also are
published in the article. Those may be categorized as opportunity varieties of literature
evaluations, and they share some, however not all, of the traits of integrative reviews. The
editorial seeks to make clear these differences and provide tips for authors lettering any sort of

literature review. At the same time as the word integrative literature review has to turn out to be
ubiquitous inside the discipline of human resource improvement, there are numerous other
varieties of literature opinions and HRDR accepts a huge variety of manuscripts, which might be
non-empirical in feature—inclusive of methodological opinions, ancient reviews, and conceptual
reviews. An argumentative review is written to offer an opposing opinion to a given role. this
could be appreciated to encourage others to link you in assisting your thesis. A historical
evaluation will check all the ancient information of scholarship chronologically even as
methodological assessment scrutinizes the studies methods by oneself. It includes series of
information, their crucial analysis, elucidation, and studies consequences, as an instance. For this
understanding, the initial aspect would be to understand what exactly the literature review is and
related concepts (Torraco, 2016).
A literature review discusses posted facts in a specific subject location, and sometimes
facts in specific difficulty vicinity within a positive term. A literature review can be only a
pretentious summary of the resources; nevertheless, it typically has an organizational sample and
comprises of both précis and synthesis. A summary is an outline of the vital facts of the source,
however a synthesis is a pre-business enterprise, or a reorganizing, of that info. It might supply a
brand new elucidation of old substantial or integrate new with historical interpretations.
Alternatively, it might hint the intellectual development of the sector, together with primary
debates. Then depending on the scenario, the literature review might also examine the assets and
suggest the reader at the maximum pertinent or appropriate. Literature reviews offer one with an
accessible manual to a specific topic. When one has confined time to conduct research, literature
critiques can come up with a top level view or act as a stepping stone (Sharma, 2015). For
experts, they are beneficial reviews that hold them updated with what is current inside the field.