Accounting Information Systems: A Case Study of Y Not Flowers, Inc. (YNF)
Verified
Added on 2023/06/07
|6
|747
|467
AI Summary
This case study analyzes the sales process of Y Not Flowers, Inc. (YNF) using BPMN activity model and REA UML Class model. It also discusses the risks and weaknesses of YNF in context to COSO's principles.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS Accounting Information Systems: A Case Study of Y Not Flowers, Inc. (YNF) Student Name: University Name:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS Table of Contents 1. BPMN activity model and REA UML Class model for Sales Process of YNF..........................2 1.1 BPMN activity model for the Sales Process..........................................................................2 1.2 REA UML Class Model for the Sales Process......................................................................3 2. Analysis onrisks and weaknesses of YNF..................................................................................3 References........................................................................................................................................5
2ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1. BPMN activity model and REA UML Class model for Sales Process of YNF 1.1 BPMN activity model for the Sales Process
3ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1.2 REA UML Class Model for the Sales Process 2. Analysis onrisks and weaknesses of YNF In context to COSO’s principle 16 for monitoring activities mentioned by King (2016), the organization does not considers a mix of ongoing and separate evaluations due to which there are various problems being faced in their business process. During the sales process, proper communication strategies are not being followed and there is little scope for evaluation of the existing process. It has been identified that the organization is handling information related to the sales process with the help of excel and there is no proper information system which is making the process complex. Basically, there is also no internal control system in the organization so ongoing and separate evaluations is not possible for the sales process (Chang et al., 2014). The
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS evaluation has also not been carried out on their sales process so that they can adjust it according to their requirements. Hence, it is suggested that they should carry out separate evaluations periodically so that they can acquire feedback and improve their sales process with the help of new information system. According to the COSO’s principle 17 for monitoring activities stated by King (2016), it has been identified that the organization does not have suitable communication procedure for delivering the internal control deficiencies to the senior management or higher authorities. The issues or problems being faced while conducting the sales process are not communicated effectively to the senior management or higher authorities of the business so there is no measure taken for the internal control deficiencies (Garcia-Holgado et al., 2015). There is no scope for corrective actions as the deficiencies within the sales process are not being communicated properly. Hence, it is suggested that the deficiencies within the sales process should be monitored on a timely basis as the management is not well aware of those and there is no proper process being followed to mitigate the issues within internal control system of the organization.
5ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS References Chang, S. I., Yen, D. C., Chang, I. C., & Jan, D. (2014). Internal control framework for a compliant ERP system.Information & Management,51(2), 187-205. Garcia-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Hernández-García, Á., & Llorens-Largo, F. (2015, July). Analysis and improvement of knowledge management processes in organizations usingthebusinessprocessmodelnotation.InAnnualConferenceoftheGlobal Innovation and Knowledge Academy(pp. 93-101). Springer, Cham. King, A. M. (2016). A guide to COSO's framework: an important, practical resource to help your transition to the updated COSO internal control framework.Strategic Finance,97(10), 12-13. Roeser, T., & Kern, E. M. (2015). Surveys in business process management–a literature review.Business Process Management Journal,21(3), 692-718. Rosemann,M.,&vomBrocke,J.(2015).Thesixcoreelementsofbusinessprocess management. InHandbook on business process management 1(pp. 105-122). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Vom Brocke, J., Petry, M., & Gonser, T. (2016). Business process management. InA Handbook of Business Transformation Management Methodology(pp. 137-172). Routledge.