ACC300 Group Assignment: Ethical Standards, Auditing, and Opinions

This assignment addresses ethical standards in accounting, focusing on violations of APES 110 and their implications. It analyzes scenarios involving breaches of confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and professional conduct. The assignment also examines different types of audit opinions, including qualified and adverse opinions, based on various situations, such as restrictions on audit procedures, undisclosed liabilities, inadequate internal controls, and non-compliance with accounting standards. The document provides detailed explanations and justifications for the opinions, referencing relevant sections of APES 110 and accounting principles. Furthermore, it evaluates situations where auditors face challenges in forming opinions due to limitations or non-compliance, and how these impact the financial statements and stakeholders. Finally, the assignment explores going concern issues and their impact on audit opinions.

T117 ACC300 GROUP ASSIGNMENT
1

Table of Contents
T117 ACC300 GROUP ASSIGNMENT........................................................................................1
Question 1....................................................................................................................................3
Question 2....................................................................................................................................6
References....................................................................................................................................8
2

Question 1
(a) In this scenario, the ethical requirements of the APES 110 are been violated because the
professional ethics never permit the company to disclose any of the information that are
gathered while auditing and security procedures regarding any client without his
permission (Trevino and Nelson 2016).
The Mortdale accounting company has organized audit of different public companies and
from there he has accumulated several working papers of different client. He then shared
those information gathered during the assurance processes to his peer reviewer- Penshurst
accountants in order to carry out assurance activity of Mortdale. Even though the
information was given for conducting the working processes of the company and for
checking whether all the processes that is necessary for executing audit is being
implemented, still it should never be shared without taking permissions of the clients.
Hence, Mortdale must have taken consent from its clients prior to providing the working
papers to the peer reviewer.
(b) Yes, the ethical requirements of APES 110 have been violated both by the CPA and the
accounting firm (Briggs 2013). Instead of depending on the words of candidate, the
accounting firm should gather information regarding its past engagements. With the
same, it is also vital to ensure that its interests are not in conflict with the organization’s
objectives.
In this scenario before providing Jan Dungog job in the company, the local accounting
firm must have made research about him. It should have tried to find out the reasons that
made him leave his past job. Through this, the firm would have identified his strength and
weakness.
(c) Yes, the ethical requirements of APES 110 have been breached by WendalSailor in this
scenario, as he is not permitted to request his clients for giving information about their
other engagements and services (Townsend 2014). It is the duty of a professional
accountant to be independent of his opinions and objectives. He should never be
influenced through any factors during conducting his assurance services and audit. This
3

may lead to influenced opinion towards its stakeholders about the true position of the
organization.
In this case the work of wendalsailor is entirely against the ethical standards of
professional accountant, as this would affect the autonomic opinion formation regarding the
true image of the engaging firm.
(d) This situation is not a breach of any of the stated ethical requirements stated under
APES110.
(e) In this scenario, Ernie Dengate should not have sold his accounting practices without
taking permission for doing that. Here he has breached the professional standards as
specified under APES 110 by selling all the working papers to Jago. The professional
standards do not allow Ernie to supply information regarding his clients to any other
without taking permissions from them (Han Fan, Woodbine and Cheng 2013). Even
though Ernie has taken permission for transferring the tax working papers, but he should
have also sought permissions sharing the audit documents too. Hence, in this way the
ethical requirements are breached in this case. This is due to the reason that there is a
direct relationship between the audit and tax working papers. It is always recommended
that audit documents should be shared and taken permission before the transfer of the tax
papers. Without taking the permission of the audit, it will involve more risk for the
transferring of the tax papers due to the reason that without having the permission of the
audit, tax paper may have to face added risk of fraud and other scams.
(f) .The professional standard stated by APES 110 under the section 290 states that a
professional accountant should not get influenced during providing the audit opinion as
well as should be independent of his views (Carey, Monroe and Shailer 2014). If an
accountant provides management services to any of the client and if it is related to the
organization’s decision, then he is not allowed to provide the audit procedure to the same
client.
In this case, Fred Nerk provides tax services, management advisory services along with
audit procedures. If providing the management advisory service influences the
independence during providing the audit or taxation services then it shall be against the
stated professional standards.
4

(g) In this case, the professional standard is not violated by the Allgood Chartered accounting
firm.
(h) James Jameson has breached the professional standards set by the APES 110 under the
section 150. The section clearly states that if the professional accountant involves in
illegal activities that could brings disgrace to his profession, then the person will be
considered as adversely affecting the stature of the profession (Clayton and Staden 2015).
James is engaged in a fight and is charged for assaulting a person being in drunken state.
With the same, he has behaved in disorderly manner during his attempt to drive off. In
this way he has violated the standard of professional behavior.
Question 2
(a) In this case, the auditor has taken every necessary action to obtain confirmations from the
major customers of the clients. He then has undertaken other audit procedures to confirm
the position of the customers who were included in the sample. The procedures finally
made him satisfied by providing balances of the accounts. Hence, it can be said that a non
qualified opinion should be expressed in this situation.
(b) A qualified opinion should be expressed by the auditor on this issue because the client has
restricted him to carry out verification processes for the property, plant and equipment.
As the accountant finds himself unable to obtain information regarding the true position
of the same, he should share this matter to those who are charged with governance With
the same, these parts comprises of 35% of the total asset. Hence, necessary disclosure
should be expresses with qualified opinion.
(c) The auditor should express a qualified opinion in this situation where the client have not
revealed the existence of contingent liability and that if it becomes actual liability, it can
harm the client’s financial position. The auditor can discuss about the matter with
management and if management could not help him out, then he should seek a qualified
opinion on this matter because it has the ability to affect the financial position of client.
With the same, the information related to the same should also be supplied to its
stakeholders.
(d) An adverse audit opinion should be expressed on this matter because the organization of
the client does not have adequate internal control procedures in order to record the cash
sales that affect the financial position of the client. With the same, the auditor is unable to
5

perform required audit tests and this is making the situation worse. This is because the
auditor is unable to form audit opinion on fair sales position made by client.
(e) In this case the accountant is unable to confirm the opening balances because he was not
involved with his new client in last financial year. Therefore, qualified opinion should be
expressed in this situation to find out the true position of the financial statements (Kumar
and Sharma 2015). This is more important due to the reason that financial statement
should always be checked with the expert accountants due to the reason that they will be
able to help in identifying the mistakes and errors in the financial statements. In addition,
financial statements are such that they cannot get examined by the common people. Thus,
it is always recommended that in order to reduce the risk of the errors and mistakes in the
financial statements, accountants should be involved in checking those.
(f) Not working according to the accounting standards may affect both the financial and true
position of the client. Hence adverse opinion should be expressed during reporting this
matter in his report. The auditor should at first state the issue to the management and in
case if no rectifications are made then the auditor should express adverse opinion on the
same.
(g) The auditor should express qualified opinion in this situation because the client is not
adhering to proper accounting methods; instead he is following a method of LIFO that is
disallowed under the Australian accounting standard (Chiang and Braender 2014)
Furthermore, there is no accurate disclosure of valuation of the inventory upon which the
auditor should express his opinion. In case if the management does not alter the inventory
method of valuation (the LIFO method), the auditor should report the issue in the report
by expressing qualified opinion (Gronewold, Gold and Salterio 2013).
(h) Where there is inappropriate going concern position of the operation or entity in the
organization and the client position in financial statements reveal that the survival of it is
difficult, and then the auditor must report this issue in his report with all the necessary
facts and figures; reasons and circumstances by expressing a qualified opinion. Since the
major customers of the organization has gone into liquidation and with the same the
chances for the other customers to take its place is very less; hence it can be concluded
that the going concern position is influenced. Therefore, expressing a qualified opinion is
needed in this situation.
6

References
Briggs, L., 2013. The Ineffectiveness of the National Programmatic Agreement for Cell
Phone Towers.
Carey, P.J., Monroe, G.S. and Shailer, G., 2014. Review of Post‐CLERP 9 Australian
Auditor Independence Research. Australian Accounting Review, 24(4), pp.370-380.
Chiang, B. and Braender, L.M., 2014. Business Ethics in Public Accounting: Ethical
Dilemmas Faced by Today’s Public Accountants and Its Implication to Accounting
Education.
Clayton, B.M. and Staden, C.J., 2015. The Impact of Social Influence Pressure on the Ethical
Decision Making of Professional Accountants: Australian and New Zealand
Evidence. Australian Accounting Review, 25(4), pp.372-388.
Gronewold, U., Gold, A. and Salterio, S.E., 2013. Reporting self-made errors: The impact of
organizational error-management climate and error type. Journal of business ethics, 117(1),
pp.189-208.
Han Fan, Y., Woodbine, G. and Cheng, W., 2013. A study of Australian and Chinese
accountants’ attitudes towards independence issues and the impact on ethical
judgements. Asian Review of Accounting, 21(3), pp.205-222.
Kumar, R. and Sharma, V., 2015. Auditing: Principles and practice. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd..
Townsend, S.R., 2014. The regulation of auditor ethical behaviour in Australia: the problem
of conflicts of interest and proposal for structural reform.
Trevino, L.K. and Nelson, K.A., 2016. Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to
do it right. John Wiley & Sons.
7