Accounting Report: Fair Value, Impairment, and Medibank Analysis

This report addresses key accounting concepts including fair value measurement, impairment testing, and relevant accounting standards such as AASB 13/IFRS 13, AASB 116/IAS 16, and AASB 136/IAS 39. The report begins with a discussion on whether Simba Ltd should adopt the fair value revaluation model for fixed assets, considering the challenges of determining fair value for certain assets and its potential impact on the company's financial statements. The second part of the report clarifies the relevance of impairment testing and its relationship with the revaluation model, clarifying the differences between them. Finally, the report analyzes Medibank's 2018 annual report to assess its compliance with the aforementioned accounting standards. This analysis includes a review of the company's valuation techniques, disclosures regarding impairment of assets, and the application of fair value accounting to various assets, including goodwill and other financial assets. The report also examines the company's impairment testing procedures and disclosures in accordance with AASB 136. The provided references support the analysis and findings.

Accounting
Assignment

By student name
Professor
University
Date: 31st March 2019.
Page 1

Table of Contents
Question 1..................................................................................................................... 3
Question 2..................................................................................................................... 3
Question 3..................................................................................................................... 4
References............................................................................................................... 11
Page 2

Question 1
The board of directors of Simba Ltd believe adopting a method of fair value for the valuation of
the assets will help the company in making the financial statements look better, and that would
eliminate the need for depreciation for the company. Most of these assets are not possible to be
obtained easily and the overall valuation of the same is also very difficult. So, the board of
director has given this proposal.
Fair value measurement is a method that uses the current market prices of the assets to value
them. There are different approaches based on which fair value can be calculated which includes
market approach, income approach or cost approach. But this does not eliminate the need for
calculation of depreciation, it leads to the revaluation model, where the assets carried on the
books is equivalent to asset fair value reduced by the accumulated depreciation and accumulated
impairment losses. So, the best advantage of using such kind of method is that it helps in
maintaining accurate valuation, thus the users can refer to the financial statements of the
company and get a correct value of the company and its assets all over. It also makes sure that
the management of the company is not manipulating with its data and the reported net income of
the company. But it is affected by the market conditions which fluctuates on many ends. Thus, it
can be said that the board of directors should adopt these proposal and value their asset as per
fair value accounting.
Question 2
The main characters of impairment testing are to make sure that the assets are carried by the
company at a price that is not more than the recoverable amount of the asset. This helps in
ensuring that overvaluation of the assets is not done and so the financial statements shows a true
position of the company and its overall financial position. In case of the revaluation model the
carrying amount of the assets increases decreases in sync with the fluctuations in the fair value of
the asset. Even though both are fairly connected there is a difference in them and that is very
apparent from its accounting. In case a company ignores the recoverable value of the asset then
there are chances that the assets fair value might exceed its recoverable value, and this will
Page 3

happen in situations where the recoverable value of the asset is equal to the fair value reduced by
the cost of disposal of the asset. If the asset is revalued to the fair value its carrying amount is
overstated by the disposal cost of the assets. Also, impairment testing is done every year and in
case of revaluation it is done in every 3-5 years. In case impairment losses are ignored it
increases the risk of potential overstatement of the assets. In short impairment is relevant to the
assets that are covered under the model of revaluation and those assets are tested for impairment,
and same applies to land and building also.
Question 3
In the following segment the annual report of the Medibank for 2018 has been downloaded and
analyzed to evaluate whether the annual report of the company is consistent with the
requirements of AASB 13/IFRS 13 Fair value Measurement, AASB 116/IAS 16 Property Plant
and Equipment, and AASB 136/IAS 39 Impairment of Assets.
a) In case of the following case all the assets have been measured under the historical cost
method except financial assets like grant (Johan, 2018). These financial assets consist of
externally managed equity trusts and direct mandates and internally managed fixed
income portfolios. Land and Building have been measured under the fair value method.
The liabilities that are measured at present value of expected future payments. The fair
value of the investments has been calculated using different techniques that includes
making conventions based on the overall market conditions. It also includes valuation
methods like the quoted market prices, and dealer quotation for similar instruments and
many other similar techniques are followed by the company (Yadao, 2018).
b) In the annual report, the management has made disclosures in the notes to account section
with respect to the kind of valuation technique that has been followed and what
measurement basis has been taken in case of most of the assets.
Page 4

Like in case of private health insurance scheme it has been stated that premium revenue
has been calculated based on the fair value method and the overall consideration is
recognized based on the straight-line basis between the date of accepting the overall
insurance risk and the date of paying up the overall amount of premium (Wendt, 2018).
In case of investments the fair value has been calculated using a variety of techniques that
includes making assumptions based on the overall market conditions. It also includes
valuation methods like the quoted market prices, or the dealer quotation for similar
instruments and yield curve calculations using the mid-yield. Also, the independent and
the vendor developed models are also followed by the company.
Fair value method of accounting is subjective, and the overall investments has been
categorized into a hierarchy that is dependent on the overall level of subjectivity
involved. The calculation of fair value hierarchy involves three different levels that
includes quoted prices, the next level being inputs other than the quoted prices, and the
last level is inputs for the asset and liability that is not based on the observable market
data (Webster, 2017). The group does not disclose the fair value of other financial assets
like the trade receivables as the overall cost involved is less and these assets are mostly of
short-term nature, the overall carrying amount of these assets are found to be approximate
to their fair value. All these disclosures regarding the type of assets, the type of valuation
method that has been followed and the overall fair value accounting that has been
undertaken is mentioned in the notes to account.
Question 3c)
Impairment of assets happens when the market price of the asset falls below the recorded value
of the asset in the financial statements. There are many assets that are tested in case of the given
company. Necessary disclosures and details regarding the same has been given the annual report
of the company in the notes to accounts sections (Vieira, O’Dwyer, & Schneider, 2017).
Page 5

The main assets that have been tested for impairment includes:
Goodwill – Goodwill held by the company is tested for impairment. In this case the assets are
grouped into different categories known as the Cash Generating units which are identifiable
sectors which are not dependent on cash inflow from other sectors. The CGU in which the
goodwill is classified is expected to benefit from the synergies of the overall combination of the
assets. There are two CGU in which the goodwill is categorized and that includes Health
Insurance CGU and Medibank Health Telehealth CGU. In case of Health insurance, the
company uses the recoverable amount that is determined based on the value-in-use. The value-
in-use is determined based on the cash flow projections that are derived from the corporate plans
of the management of the company. Any cash flow beyond the corporate plans are analyzed
based on the estimated growth rates (Norberg, 2018).
In case of Medibank Health Telehealth CGU, the recoverable amount is calculated based on the
value in use that is calculated based on the one-year projections that are done by the
management.
Apart from goodwill none of the assets of the company are tested for impairment, other
intangibles like the software are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment
losses. Customer contracts and relationships that are acquired by the company are recorded at
their fair value. In case of such assets, they are often accessed for impairments in case there is a
change in events that indicates that the carrying amount will not be recovered by the company
(Kaufmann, 2017). The major assumption that is done by the management in this regard is
assessing the overall contracts of the customer, assumptions are made on the renewal of these
contracts, cash flow associated with these contracts, long term plans of the organization. So, we
see that impairment testing plays an important role in determining the accurate value of the
assets that a company might be holding especially for intangible assets that includes the goodwill
(Johan, 2018).
Question 3d)
The necessary disclosures regarding impairment has been made in the notes to accounts of the
company, where the details of the assets that have been tested, the overall methods that have
been adopted by the company, the different assumptions that are done by the company in
Page 6

calculation of the recoverable amount of depreciation and the necessary accounting standards
that have been followed by the company in this impairment testing. All the necessary disclosures
have been given based on the impairment of assets AASB 136 (Cundill, Smart, & Wilson, 2017).
It highlights the key assumptions of the company in calculation of the carrying charges, the rates
on which the present value are calculated and the events and circumstances under which these
rates changes are also stated in the notes to account of the company (Schwarzbichler, Steiner, &
Turnheim, 2018).
Like we see in the figure stated below, the management of the company has disclosed the overall
trade and other receivable net of the allowance of the impairment losses of the company. Over
the year if we see that the allowance for impairment is and there is very less reduction in the
same. This allowance for impairment loss is stated so that in case there is any change in events or
circumstances then there should be a provision to deal with the same and in no case the carrying
amount of the assets should be more than the recoverable value of the assets (Boghossian, 2017).
Goodwill is the most important asset that is tested for impairment and the company provides
proper disclosures with regards to that in its notes to account. An extract from the same has been
attached below for further understanding –
Page 7

In case of goodwill the CGU in which the goodwill is classified is expected to benefit from the
overall combination of the assets. There are two CGU in which the goodwill is categorized and
that includes Health Insurance CGU and Medibank Health Telehealth CGU. In case of Health
insurance, the company uses the recoverable amount that is resoluted based on the value-in-use.
The value-in-use is based on the cash flow projections that are derived from the corporate plans
of the management of the company. Any cash flow beyond the corporate plans are analyzed
based on the estimated growth rates (Deegan, 2014).
The key assumptions that are made by the company are also disclosed in the notes to accounts
for the users of the financial statements (Abdullah & Said, 2017). These key assumptions are
related to the growth rates and discount rates, the health insurance CGU, the Medibank Health
Telehealth CGU and the overall impact in case there are changes in any kind of situations and
events are also stated in the notes to account of the company. An extract from the same is
attached below:
The annual report of the company can be found at the below URL :
Page 8

https://www.medibank.com.au/content/dam/retail/about-assets/pdfs/investor-
centre/annual-reports/Medibank_Annual_Report_2018.pdf
References
Abdullah, W., & Said, R. (2017). Religious, Educational Background and Corporate
Crime Tolerance by Accounting Professionals. State-of-the-Art Theories and
Empirical Evidence, 3(1), 129-149.
Boghossian, P. (2017). The Socratic method, defeasibility, and doxastic
responsibility. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(3), 244-253.
Cundill, G., Smart, P., & Wilson, H. (2017). Non‐financial Shareholder Activism: A
Process Model for Influencing Corporate Environmental and Social
Performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 606-626.
Deegan, C. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory (first ed.). Australia: McGraw-Hill
Education (Australia) Pty Ltd.
Johan, S. (2018). The Relationship Between Economic Value Added, Market Value
Added And Return On Cost Of Capital In Measuring Corporate Performance.
Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 3(1), 121-134.
Kaufmann, W. (2017). The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness (First ed.). New
York: Routledge.
Norberg, P. (2018). Bankers Bashing Back: Amoral CSR Justifications. Journal of
Business Ethics, 147(2), 401-418.
Schwarzbichler, M., Steiner, C., & Turnheim, D. (2018). Impairment of Assets (Fixed
Assets and Goodwill) (first ed.). New York: Springer Publication.
Vieira, R., O’Dwyer, B., & Schneider, R. (2017). Aligning Strategy and Performance
Management Systems. SAGE Journals, 30(1), 23-48.
Webster, T. (2017). Successful Ethical Decision-Making Practices from the
Professional Accountants' Perspective. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing,
3(1), 142-156.
Wendt, K. (2018). Positive Impact Investing: A Sustainable Bridge between Strategy,
Innovation, Change and Learning (first ed.). Switzerland: Springer.
Yadao, J. (2018). Forensic accountants and big data.
Page 9

Page 10