Accounting Theory, Managerial Pay, Performance, and Finance

Verified

Added on  2021/06/16

|5
|1333
|26
Homework Assignment
AI Summary
This assignment delves into the realm of accounting theory, exploring the intricate relationship between managerial pay, performance, and financial management. The solution begins by examining the use of pay-for-performance systems and performance appraisals to align organizational goals with employee incentives. It then provides a detailed analysis of BHP Billiton's CEO remuneration, highlighting the components of base salary, short-term incentives (STI), and long-term incentives (LTI), and the factors influencing these components. The assignment further discusses the principal-agent model, the separation of ownership and control, and how bonus schemes can mitigate issues arising from this separation. It also addresses moral hazard in contracts, emphasizing the role of restrictive covenants in mitigating risks. The assignment underscores the importance of accounting information in decision-making, particularly in banking, and its role in addressing agency problems. The solution incorporates relevant references to support its arguments and analysis.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
ACCOUNTING THEORY
1
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Accounting
Answer - 1
Managerial pay and performance are balanced by the organization with the help pay for
performance system. It is done through the concept of performance appraisal. The
organization draws a line of difference and projects them that help them to have a strong
focus on the goals. The organization designs a number of methods that are in tune with the
functioning of the company (Parrino et. al, 2012). Further, the organization must consider that
the performance goals and measure are relevant, reasonable and usable because it helps the
employees to understand and take active participation in the performance evaluation process.
The organization should have a pay for performance system and must devote appropriate time
to the evaluation of the performance (Marsh, 2009). The organizations ensure proper balance
with the aid of strong policies that consider the performance and the payment measures. It just
needs to ensure that the benefits of either party are not suppressed as it might create
differences.
Answer - 2
BHP Billiton listed on the ASX and a pioneer in the mining sector is considered for the
purpose of a study. Mr, Mackenzie is the CEO and the total remuneration for FY 2017 stands
at USD4.554 million as compared to a figure of USD 2.241 million in the year 2016. The
main difference for the figure appears in the fact that he did not receive any STI for the year
2016 because of the dam failure together with a fall in the commodity market that affected the
performance. Moreover, the LTI in 2016 stands at zero and the same was repeated in 2017.
The base salary of Mackenzie stands at USD 1.700 million yearly and the contribution of
pension is 25 percent of base salary (BHP Billiton, 2017). There is no change to base salary
or pension contribution in the year 2018.
The annual STI of the CEO is bent on incentivizing controllable yearly performance and is
160 percent of the base salary that is linked to attainment of performance. Further, a
maximum of 240 percent of base salary is realizable in the scenario of major outer
performance and a minimum outcome tends to be zero (BHP Billiton, 2017).
The Remuneration committee establishes the remuneration of the CEO that is based on the
remuneration policy and charter. The committee considers the market condition that is
prevailing, the competitive environment and the positioning of the pay scenario across the
workforce of BHP. The committee ascertains the annual base salary for the employee while
determining the base salary of the CEO (BHP Billiton, 2017).
Document Page
Accounting
The CEO can ensure with his decision-making process that the business benefits in the
performance. If the business derives ample benefits from the decision-making process then
the CEO can have an added advantage thereby leading to a maximum bonus.
The principal-agent model is the main model that underpins the reason why managers are
compensation with stocks, options, etc. The principal-agent model stress upon the economic
interaction of the uninformed party that delegates task to the informed party who private
action can impact both the parties. Principal-agent model is tools that highlight the maximum
incentive method that addresses the interest between principal and agent based on the
preferences and information structure.
Answer – 3
The separation of ownership and control implies that the managers can act as per their own
interest that may be different to the shareholder interest. This can be attributed to the number
of difficulties such as:
Risk aversion problem – Less risk is being preferred by the manager because human capital is
linked to the firm. The main preference is to diversify the risk instead of maximizing the
firm’s value.
Retention of dividend – It is a common parlance that the manager prefers to pay less out of
the earnings of the firm so that they can pay their own perquisites (Bedard et. al, 2014).
Horizon problem – Managers are interested in cash flow as it influences the remuneration for
the period while the shareholders have a long-term interest because share price equals the PV
of the expectation of the shareholders of all future cash flow.
Bonus scheme can lessen such problem by associating the manager’s remuneration to the
index of the performance of the firm that contains a high correlation with the firm’s value
such as share price or earnings. This connects the managers and the interest of the shareholder
by linking managerial compensation to the performance ex-ante without requiring the need to
stress on the ex-post method like renegotiating the salary (Petty et. al, 2012).
Answer – 4
One of the major tools for facing the moral hazard in a contract of a dent is enforcing the
restrictive covenant. It is a means of reducing the moral hazard. It is done by ruling out
undesirable behavior or enforcing the desirable behavior (Mock, 2010). The covenant lowers
the moral hazard by stopping the borrower from going opposite to the covenant terms. Hence,
this deters the borrower from grasping any investments of risky nature. On the contrary, the
restrictive covenant can be utilized to influence desirable behavior (Melville, 2013). It allows
Document Page
Accounting
the borrower to take various investments that will yield desirable results. Hence, it ensures
that the loan will be repaid.
The banking industry has specified the number of agency problems. One of the prominent
problems is that of limitation on the managerial wealth force that is a separation between the
ownership and control. As a result of this, managers pursue the objectives at the shareholder
expense. Asset risk can be defined more in banks (Bedard et. al, 2014). Accounting
information can ensure strong information that helps in ascertaining the facts and figure. In
the presence, if proper information, the banks will be able to take proper decision. Hence, it
will aid in the smooth decision-making process. Therefore, the major help that accounting
information can ensure is that of the projecting valid and meaningful information that assists
in decision making. In the absence of such information, it will be difficult to operate and
provide valid judgments.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Accounting
References
Bedard, J., N., Gonthier, Besacier, & Schatt, A. (2014) Costs and Benefits of Reporting Key,
Harvard Press
BHP Billiton. (2017). BHP 2017 Annual report and accounts [online]. Available from:
https://www.bhp.com/media-and-insights/reports-and-presentations [Accessed 30 May 2018]
Marsh, C. (2009) Mastering financial management. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Melville, A. (2013) International Financial Reporting – A Practical Guide. 4th edition.
Pearson, Education Limited, UK
Mock, T. (2010) A Ten-Country Comparative Analysis, Human Resource Management.
[online]. 41(1), pp. 45-66.
Nau S. (2010) Adopting Fairer Compensation, American City & County. [online]. 114(1), pp.
10-21
Parrino, R, Kidwell, D. & Bates, T. (2012) Fundamentals of corporate finance. Hoboken,
Petty, J. W, Titman, S., Keown, A. J., Martin, J. D., Burrow, M. and Nguyen, H. (2012)
Financial Management: Principles and Applications, 6th ed. Australia: Pearson Education
Australia.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 5
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
logo.png

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]