AGL Energy Limited's Sustainability Reporting Practices: An Analysis

This report provides a detailed analysis of AGL Energy Limited's sustainability reporting practices. It begins by introducing AGL's commitment to sustainable energy and its role as a major player in Australia's energy market. The report examines the integration of sustainability into AGL's overall business strategy, highlighting the company's shift towards renewable energy and low-emission technologies. Key stakeholders, including employees, customers, shareholders, and the community, are identified and their interests discussed. The analysis then assesses AGL's sustainability performance, noting strengths in areas such as energy market evolution, public policy engagement, corporate governance, legislative requirements, customer experience, community engagement, greenhouse policy compliance, profitability, and supply chain management. Weaknesses are identified in ethical conduct and community investment. Finally, the report evaluates the overall quality of AGL's sustainability report, focusing on its readability, structure, and inclusion of relevant information on economic, environmental, and social performance, as well as risk management strategies. Desklib offers this and many more solved assignments to aid students.

Running Head: AGL’s Sustainability Report
Sustainability Reporting Practices
AGL Energy Limited

AGL’s Sustainability Report 1
Introduction
AGL Energy Limited is highly committed to contribute to shape the future of Australia
towards sustainable energy and it has reporting about its sustainable practices since 2004. The
company operates as the largest power generation portfolio across the country of which AGL
is the largest ASX Listed investor in the areas of renewal energy. The company has over 3.6
million customer accounts and has the experience of more than 180 years which has allowed
it to gain huge market share. The company has the responsibility of providing sustainability,
secured and affordable energy products for its customers. AGL Energy is aimed at prosperity
of world which is carbon-constrained and building the customer advocacy since the industry
in which it is operating is transforming. Further, the company is also committed to exit the
coal-fired generation by the end of 2050 and is also to continue to develop the innovative and
unique energy solutions for its wide base of customers.
Integration of sustainability strategy into overall business strategy of AGL Energy:
AGL is the biggest coal-fired energy generators operating privately in Australia and the
country’s largest operator of assets used in renewable energy generations in Australia. Also,
the company is among the largest energy retailers in the country. Presently, the company is
striving to become the personalised retailer from being the mass retailer of the energy
products through the use of various innovative and smarter solutions, upgraded technologies
and advanced services to serve its customers in the best possible manner. Also, AGL is
transforming from being the private owner and operator of the large energy generation assets
to the orchestrator of various large and small assets that allow energy generation, storage and
distribution among the different individuals. Moreover, AGL is also making efforts to move
towards the adoption of technologies that results in low-emission of toxic gases in the
environment. As a part of this business strategy, the company has set a deadline to shut-down

AGL’s Sustainability Report 2
its coal plants and to invest significant amount of funds in renewable energy processes. The
company recognises the importance of sustainability business practices for its continuous
growth and success. The management of the AGL believes that the reputational standing of
the company is maintained not merely by its sound economic performance but also its social
and environmental performance. Therefore, it is also aiming towards formulation of such
business strategies which leads to appropriate decision making and course of actions towards
sustainability business practices. The sustainable business strategy of AGL has clearly
outlined the material sustainability matters connecting it to the business strategy. The
company has wide range of on-going projects at different phases of development which
provide it a strategic depth as well as flexibility to its electricity generation business.
Australia’s energy markets are highly dynamic nowadays due to the advancement of
technologies and widened customer expectation, AGL is emphasising on adoption and
formulation of such strategies which enables it to globally commit to reduce the greenhouse
emission. The company also has an enduring as well as sustainable framework of climate
change policy in place which enables it to make investments in infrastructures meant for
electricity supply. Moreover, the greenhouse policy of the company is designed to contribute
positively towards meeting the climate change objectives.
Key stakeholders of AGL Energy:
Stakeholders are the parties which are directly or indirectly influenced by the actions and
performance of the company. A company can have a wide range of stakeholders from both its
internal or external business environment. The stakeholders who belong to the internal
environment of the company are called internal stakeholders. Internal stakeholders of a
company are managers, owners and employees (Perrini & Tencati, 2006). On the other hand,
stakeholders who belong to the external environment of the company are called its external
stakeholders. The governmental agencies that regulates the business of company, suppliers or

AGL’s Sustainability Report 3
vendors, the customers, the provider of finance such as banks, financial institutions,
investors, shareholders and the business community in which company operates its business
are its external stakeholders.
In the present case of AGL Energy, the company has various stakeholders such as employees,
creditors, customers, society in which it is operating its business, the holders of its shares and
other investors such banks and financial institutions, the community in which it operates its
business. The shareholders are the parties which have provided AGL Energy a financial
assistance by ways of shares in return of which they hold a portion of equity (ownership) in
the company (Berthelot, Coulmont & Serret, 2012). For their shareholding, the shareholders
possess voting right in the company. These voting rights are utilised whenever, any
significant matter is discussed in relation to the business of the company. Along with the
voting rights, shareholders of AGL are also entitled to the dividend which is the part of
company’s profit distributed among those stockholders. The shareholders of the company are
therefore interested in knowing about the profitability position of the company. The banks
and financial institutions have given large sums of funds to the company as a financial
assistance in their business operations. Before and even after lending funds to AGL the banks
and other financial institutions have to consistently assess the solvency position of the
company (Prado‐Lorenzo, Gallego‐Alvarez & Garcia‐Sanchez, 2009). Further, AGL
presently holds around 3.6 million customer accounts and it supplies gas and electricity
across Australia. The customers of the company expects from it to maintain top quality of its
energy related products and services. The sustainable reporting function has helped the
company in maintaining its high level of credibility and trust in the eyes of its customers in t
in the market. The said report contains the policies, strategies and other initiatives that are
undertaken by the company to maintain the quality in its production processes. Further, the
community in which AGL Energy is operating is one of its stakeholders. As the company

AGL’s Sustainability Report 4
deploys the natural resources in the large number for its basic business operations of energy
production and distribution, it is its core responsibility to conserve these valuable resources
by taking up sustainable business practices. Also, the production processes of AGL Energy
involves carbon gas emissions which causes the harm to the environment so the company is
obligated to take environment responsive actions so as to avoid causing excessive pollution to
the environment (Morsin, Schultz, 2006).
Areas of strong sustainability performance of AGL Energy:
There are various areas under which the company has outperformed its own targets which
were pre-determined for the financial year 2017 before the commencement of said year. The
following are the areas where the company has strongly achieved its targets:
 Energy market evolution:
The company had the aim to positively contribute towards the electricity market
development. AGL had a target of publishing two leadership papers in this context but in
reality it has published more than two papers which contributed to the design of sustainable
market.
 Public policy engagement:
AGL was aimed at engaging itself with the Australian government so as to transparently
contribute to the development of sensitive public policy. AGL has successfully engaged itself
in making material submissions of public policy.
 Corporate governance:
The aim of AGL was to adopt the best practices in the areas of corporate governance. In
relation to which the company has successfully published corporate governance statement

AGL’s Sustainability Report 5
which shows the details of composition of Board of AGL and their respective roles. Also, it
clearly states that the corporate governance structure of the company is adequately framed
that it has effectively maintained transparency in its operations so as to protect the interest of
the stakeholders (AGL Energy, 2017).
 Legislative requirements:
All the compliance requirements have been strictly adhered to in the financial year 2017 and
there were zero number of adverse court proceedings in relation to Australian Consumer
Laws and also there is no case of penalty or fines in relation to environmental compliances.
The targeted Environmental Regulatory Reportable Frequency Rate was to be kept below 1.5.
However, in reality it was only 1 (AGL Sustainability Report, 2017).
 Customer experience:
AGL aimed at fulfilling the needs of the customers. It was targeted to bring improvement in
the average annual NPS score in 2017 from 2016. The actual NPS in 2017 was higher than
that of 2016.
 Community engagement:
At a minimum 4 events were organised at each site where the business of AGL Energy was
operated with the aim of mutual development of advantageous energy projects.
Employee engagement:
The targeted talent retention was on or above 80% but actually the talent retention rate in
2017 was 93% which is quite better than that of 2016. Also, it was targeted to keep the rate of
injury frequencies was kept below 3.9 but in FY 2017, actual frequency rate was merely.
 Green-house policy:

AGL’s Sustainability Report 6
The compliance with green-house policy of the company was 100% in the areas of climate
change.
Further, in the areas of renewal energy, water management, air, noise and waste management,
biological diversity management, rehabilitation the ERRFR is 1 which was targeted at 1.5.
 Profitability:
The profitability position of AGL is slightly improved in 2017 as compared to 2016.
 Supply chain management:
The supplier agreements that were signed in 2017 were 100% authenticated and was in line
with the supplier’s code of conduct (AGL Sustainability Report, 2017).
Areas of weak sustainability performance of AGL Energy:
 Ethical conduct:
The targeted number of substantiated issues in relation to the unacceptable behaviour at the
workplace was zero. However in 2017 there were 8 issues identified and reported in the said
areas.
 Community investment:
The targeted employee volunteering participation rate was 35% but actual rate in this respect
in 2017 was merely 16% (AGL Sustainability Report, 2017).

AGL’s Sustainability Report 7
Overall assessment of quality of the company’s sustainability report:
Readability
The quality of the sustainability reporting depends on the credibility and communicative
value of the information contained in the sustainable report of the company. The
sustainability report of AGL Energy contains all the relevant information about the company
in the logical structured manner so as to allow the users of the report to perceive the true
sense of the information contained therein (Gray & Milne, 2002). The report covers the
information about the vision of the company in social economic and environmental terms. It
also contains the information insights about the markets in which company is actively
operating its business and the target markets where AGL would be more actively
participating. From these discussions on the report, the readers could easily identify the
extent to which AGL has redefined its economic role. The report shows that company is not
merely a sales driver and the source of profit. Followed by the general introduction, the
business strategy of AGL Industry that is integrated in the overall business strategy of the
company has been discussed to allow the users of the report to understand how the objectives
of sustainability are achieved in the course of achieving the overall objectives of the business.
A use of scorecard has been made in the report to recognise the performance targets in
financial year 2017, the results of actual performance and the targets for financial year 2018.
Apart from economic performance, the performance in various material areas such as
employee engagement, environment, customer relationship, sustainability business strategy,
ethical conduct, corporate governance and legislative compliances has been included in the
scorecard. While presenting the said scorecard, the focus is on stakeholder’s relations and the
management system of the company. Further, the report also contains the strategies that the
company has implemented to manage the risk its economic, environmental, social,
compliance and IT related risks (Aras & Crowther, 2009). The inclusion of discussion on risk

AGL’s Sustainability Report 8
management strategies is to show the AGL’s interest towards contributing to its social as well
as environment’s sustainable development. Along with qualitative information, disclosure of
quantitative facts has been made by the company in its sustainability report (Daub, 2007).
The report makes reference to the factual data in the form of performance indicators which
are used by AGL to take responsive actions towards environment, social and economic
objectives. The sustainability report of AGL Energy is prepared keeping in mind the
information needs of the stakeholders of the company and all the matters are reported in the
most transparent manner.
Adoption of GRI principles
Further, the report has been prepared by following the Global Reporting Initiative Principles.
GRI framework is a credible framework of sustainability reporting which can be adopted by
any type of the organisation. To ensure the quality of the sustainability report various
principles have been used such as balance, accuracy, timeliness, reliability and clarity of
whatever information is presented in the report (Kolk, 2008). The report of AGL Energy has
reflecting both positive as well as negative aspects of the performance in terms of social,
economic and environmental goals and objectives so as to allow the stakeholders to
understand the overall performance of the business. AGL has incorporated the performance
targets for 2017 and 2018 and along with this it has also included the results of actual
performance for FY 2017. This has allowed the stakeholders to make comparative analysis of
the company’s performance so that they can better assess the company’s effectiveness in
achieving its targets. The quality sustainable report allows the stakeholders of the company to
gauge its performance over time as well in relation to the other firms belonging to the same
industry. The information contained in the sustainability report of AGL Energy sufficiently
accurate and detailed enough to allow the users to understand the purpose of inclusion of
such information in the said report. The company has also engaged Deloitte Touche

AGL’s Sustainability Report 9
Tohmastu to provide the assurance of company’s own declaration about the compliance of
GRI standards (AGL Energy, 2017).
Conclusion:
From the examination of Sustainability Report, 2017 it can be said AGL Energy has
performed its business operations keeping in mind the sustainable development of the
country. Thus, it has positively contributed to the development and growth in economic,
social and environmental terms. However in terms of ethical conduct and employee health
safety, AGL has failed to achieve the desired targets.

AGL’s Sustainability Report 10
References:
AGL Energy, 2017. Annual Report. Available at:
http://agl2017.reportonline.com.au/sites/agl2017.reportonline.com.au/files/
concise_financial_report_2017.pdf Accessed: 07.10.2018
AGL Energy, 2017. Sustainability Report. Available at:
http://agl2017.reportonline.com.au/sites/agl2017.reportonline.com.au/files/
sustainability_report_full_report_0.pdf Accessed: 07.10.2018
Berthelot, S., Coulmont, M. and Serret, V., 2012. Do investors value sustainability reports? A
Canadian study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(6),
pp.355-363.
Daub, C.H., 2007. Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative
methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), pp.75-85.
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S. and Ricceri, F., 2015. CSR reporting practices and the quality of
disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, pp.59-78.
Morsing, M. and Schultz, M., 2006. Corporate social responsibility communication:
stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business ethics: a European
review, 15(4), pp.323-338.
Prado‐Lorenzo, J.M., Gallego‐Alvarez, I. and Garcia‐Sanchez, I.M., 2009. Stakeholder
engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure
effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), pp.94-107.

AGL’s Sustainability Report 11
Kolk, A., 2008. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring
multinationals' reporting practices. Business strategy and the environment, 17(1), pp.1-15.
Perrini, F. and Tencati, A., 2006. Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for
new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 15(5), pp.296-308.
Gray, R. and Milne, M., 2002. Sustainability reporting: who's kidding whom?. Chartered
Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81(6), pp.66-70.
Aras, G. and Crowther, D., 2009. Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in
disingenuity?. Journal of business ethics, 87(1), p.279.