Textual Analysis Report: Speech-Acts Analysis of Bush Speech

This report presents a textual analysis of a speech, focusing on the methodological perspective of speech-acts, as articulated by Quentin Skinner. The study examines a speech delivered by President George W. Bush to the U.S. Congress on September 20, 2001. It explores the possibilities and limitations of speech-act analysis, the objects of study within the speech (including the identification of various speech acts such as compliments, announcements, and acknowledgements), and the role of conceptual history. The report discusses encountered difficulties, such as biases and the challenges of understanding audience perception, and concludes with the key learnings from the analysis, emphasizing the interdisciplinary nature of the methodology and the president's use of speech acts within the context of historical events and societal impact. The analysis references relevant literature and historical context, offering valuable insights into the use of language in political discourse.

Textual Analysis

TABLE OF CONTENT
1. METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR ANALYSIS.....................................................3
a. speech-acts ( Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics)...........................................................3
2. DISCUSSION ON THE CHOSEN METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE............................3
a) Possibilities and limitations of the implicated methodological perspective.......................3
b) Objects of the study............................................................................................................3
c) Discussion on the considered facts of the chosen article...................................................4
d) Encountered difficulties.....................................................................................................4
e) Learnings from the analysis...............................................................................................5
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6

1. METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR ANALYSIS
a. Speech-acts ( Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics)
As per the views of Skinner, speech is also considered to an action. Theory of speech acts is
concerned with the philosophy of action. It also explains the role of causality during explanation
of behaviour. Improvement in the awareness about the aspects of speech and writing is important
to understand the association between power and language (Skinner, 2001, p.5). Speech act
analysis should not be considered as merely a piece of philosophical jargon.
2. DISCUSSION ON THE CHOSEN METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
a) Possibilities and limitations of the implicated methodological perspective
There are various possibilities and limitations of speech acts.
It is basically to discuss upon some factual opportunities and limitations of an abstractive
framework that has been implicated over here to discuss on the elected article of speech that was
held by the President George W. Bush to U.S. Congress dated on 20 September, 2001. In relation
to which, a conceptual study has hereby acted as a filtering tool that has further aided to go
beyond the descriptive message of the speech as a mean of explaining its materialistic
representation. However, on referring to some of its limited perceptions, it has been interpreted
that it is comprised with both initial and ongoing forums of biasses (Skinner and Quentin, 2001).
The initial sense of partiality is basically when the study duly gets influenced by the proposed
thoughts of the individual with another fact of ongoing partiality. It is when the surveyor is
influenced by the evolved perception of the study with a fact of giving value to certain things and
disregarding others that in turn interrupt into the inbuilt balance of the study.
Limitations of speech-act is that it is not sufficient to analyse verbal communication. However,
the possibility is that it can be expected that a vital role can be played by speech acts in empirical
theory of language and communication. But, another limitation with speech- acts is that these
suffer with problems of identifiability of unit acts.
b) Objects of the study
The objects of study in the chosen texts were speech- acts. A methodological perspective of
speech-acts has been opted to conceptualise the study that has presented a speech given by the
President George W. Bush to U.S. Congress dated on 20 September, 2001. On whose basis, the

historical conceptions of this study that has been analysed over here are linked with the war
assumptions of the President where he has addressed the American civilians to keep patience in
regard to come out of such terrible situation. It has together discussed upon some historical
measures taken up by America to tackle the existing situation (McKee, 2003). A number of
speech acts have been identified. This is for instance to one of his spoken lines “My fellow
citizens, for the last nine days, the entire world has seen for itself the state of our Union, and it is
strong.” on page number 1 that reflected a “compliment”. Another type of speech detected over
here is “announcement” that was again in page number 1 in the lines “justice will be done.
“Thanking” is the next speech act that was yet again depicted in page number 1 defining the line
“I thank the Congress” (Skinner & Quentin, 2001). Wherein, “acknowledgement” is yet another
discovered speech act in page number 2 where he stated “I thank the world for its outpouring of
support.” And lastly, informing is referred to be the endmost speech act in the chosen literature
that was ascertained in the line of page number 5 stating “We will direct every resource at our
command -- every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law
enforcement, every financial influence and every necessary weapon of war -- to the destruction
and to the defeat of the global terror network.”
The term conceptual history that is also acknowledged as the history of speech-acts and in
German, Begriffsgechichte is termed to be a branch of cultural and historical studies as a mean
of dealing with the linguistic terminologies that are being used while configuring the historical
study. Into which, the three main agendas are rigorously being pursued as a mean of intercepting
the perception of scientific discipline, abstractive model and cultural of contemporary in the
contended set of data that are being represented in a textual framework. Etymology plays a
greater role in it where this study is also supported to illustrate any altered significance in the
terms that are being used in the textual messages. Conceptual history is together known to deal
with the development of classical ideas and quantifiable systems over the changing period of
time (Parker, I., 2014). This article has together conceptualised the terrible fear of terrorism in
people that are being addressed by the President in his entire speech where he has also referred to
rise the helpful bodies who are supporting in its removal.
c) Discussion on the considered facts of the chosen article
The current state of war are hereby taken into a valid consideration where it has referred
to discourse upon varied other participants of war like the fellow citizens of America, FBI

agents, victims of terrors and their families, Congress leaders and American administrations, etc.
It has also involved some other relevant bodies of New York to strengthen the American forces.
This is for instance to specify about some conceptualised terms like autonomy and improvement
where it together tends to contend with the facts of social history. Hence, all historical
consideration is expected to begin with a principle agreement of the qualified values in cultural
and historical practices. It is basically to relate with their changing backgrounds over the
modifying period of time and should not be treated as a mere concept of static ideologies and
procedures (Howarth and David, 2000). A prior interest in this particular segment of conceptual
history was drawn in the period of 20th century by some phenomenal publications written by
some famous authors.
d) Encountered difficulties
There existed varied difficulties while carrying out this particular study with a leading
force of prejudices in it. It firstly created a difficulty in understanding the reflective cognition of
the study provided with another concern of balancing its prominence by evaluating its overall
context (Silverman, 2013). It has been compared to some other relative terms of economics,
civilization and modernism has developed at a much slower pace where they are used on
continual basis with a brief and disrupted past of the term globalisation. Some other encountered
difficulties while referring to this study was to study about the actual perception of the audiences
listening to President's speech. It was basically as a mean of identifying their power of patience
to deal with the prevalent state of terrorism over there.
e) Learnings from the analysis
The above analysis has hereby assisted in learning the conceptual base of methodology
that is usually adopted in a study that was based on referring to the interpreted texts of the speech
given by the President George W. Bush to U.S. Congress on 20th September, 2001 (Richter and
Melvin, 1990). It is where the term of conceptual history was duly configured as an
interdisciplinary tact of methodologies implicated to undertake varied set of investigation. In
context to which, the President is hereby evident to make a detailed study about the
chronological facts of past wars and their impact on the residing people of America. It is
therefore on enlightening the opted text analysis where there existed several speech-acts used by
the president George Bush in his speech.

REFERENCES
Books and Journal
Howarth, David (2000). Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press. (176 pages).
McKee, A., 2003. Textual analysis: A beginner's guide. Sage.
Parker, I., 2014. Discourse Dynamics (Psychology Revivals): Critical Analysis for Social and
Individual Psychology. Routledge.
Richter, Melvin (1990). “Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner,
and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”, History & Theory 29(1), 1990, pp. 38- 70.
Silverman, D., 2013. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications
Limited.
Skinner, Q., 2001. Visions of Politics, vol. 1: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, chap. 1, 4, 6, 10. (77 pages).