Analyzing Employee Social Media Ethics and Business Conduct

This essay provides an ethical analysis of whether employees should be able to post negative comments against their employers on social media, considering freedom of speech, legal rights, and potential consequences for both the employee and the organization. It discusses the importance of addressing concerns internally before resorting to public platforms and examines the impact on brand identity. The essay also delves into business ethics, focusing on issues like harassment and discrimination, particularly in the Australian context, referencing relevant legislation and ethical principles such as beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. It further explores Rushworth Kidder's framework for ethical decision-making, including moral temptations and ethical dilemmas, and concludes by emphasizing the importance of ethics in guiding business conduct and fostering equality in the workplace. Desklib provides a platform to access this and many other solved assignments for students.

ETHICAL ANALYSIS

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3
Part 1............................................................................................................................................3
Part B ..........................................................................................................................................4
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................1

INTRODUCTION
Ethics is a morale values of an individual or a firm or an institutions. This study will
discuss the ground of ethical analysis such a employees should be able to post negative
comments against the organisation. Furthermore, the business ethics issue will also discuss in the
project.
MAIN BODY
Part 1
A)
Should employees be able to post negative comments against the employer in order to showcase
the individual concern?
B)
The chosen question is very important. As the freedom of speech must be there even if
the person is being employed at some organisation. This is the legal right of the employee to
express the opinion on social media if they have experienced something wrong or bad. This is a
big issue as in today time anyone post anything negative on social media accounts. This is the
legal right of the employee to express the opinion it is also unethical to do it without addressing
the issue in front of the authority eligible or liable to look at such a matter.
C)
Freedom of speech, equality act and such other are applicable to this respective matter. These
acts allow the person and individual to express the opinion in front of the people and world.
D)
There are a certain facts require taking into the considering whole entertaining the
respective issue. It is important that employee must have expressed his concern in front of the
eligible person to look into the whole matter. This is highly required for the institutions that the
individual or the person must have expressed the concern (Aitchison and Meckled-Garcia, 2021).
Positing anything like this on social media can completely damage to the brand identity of the
organisation. This is important that before positing anything big employee must showcase the
concern with respective authority. The comment must be truthful as employee must not post
anything in order to take on the undue advantages.

E)
Positive consequences
This act will allow and support the employee to raise the issue at a bigger level. Further,
this action would allow the employee to gain the public support or the support of the top
authority of the organisation in order to address the whole issue.
Negative consequences
This act may lead to some negative consequences like this is highly possible that
employee kight loose the respective job. Further, this can also damage the brand value of the
organisation as well.
F)
Posting on social media is free today. Employees also hold the right to post anything if
they have experienced something wrong or unethical. It is also required that before taking any
such step employee must have discussed in front of the employer the issue they are facing
(Gardner and Allen, 2019). If the company is not listening to the concern of the employee or not
in a position to address the issue than this is the right of employee to raise the issue further.
Social media will be a very powerful platform to showcase the opinion or issue. If the employee
did not receive the favourable response than this step is required and ethical.
Part B
Business ethics can be defined as set of values that is followed by organization in order
to provide their employee and customer quality services. Nowadays the most common issues
in business is harassment and discrimination. During the time of pandemic this issues has
increased radially. Along with this, discrimination can be defined as means of being treated
differently or unfairly although is illegal in employment to treat someone on the basis of
personal characteristics, sex or status. It can be expresses in the form of harassment such as
boss is unfairly treating its subordinates or do something that create a hostile environment. In
Australia, it's unlawful to discriminate on the basis of age, race, sex and gender as well as
education (Kelly and et.al., 2021). Although Australian human rights and equal opportunity
commission act has made provision related to discrimination.
In addition to this, Rushworth Kidder has defined ethics means right and wrong and the
behaviour of an individual that is socially accepted by the society. It mainly included morals,

values, tolerance and discipline. There are three core values and principle that is followed by
ethics such Maleficence that means do no harm, beneficence means promoting good as well
as justice means right of fairness. Although Rushworth Kidder suggest that decision-making
process is driven by core values, integrity, morals as well as it falls under two types such as
Moral temptations and ethical dilemmas (Sroka and Szántó, 2018). Along with this, Moral
temptation is basically about right and wrong as it clearly based on the core values of person.
There are three ways of being wrong like violation of the law, departure from the truth and
deviation from moral. There are various principle involved in right and wrong such as the
stench test that a person should listen to the gut feeling as well as front page test is consist
of social morals. Furthermore, ethical dilemmas is defined by Kidder at right vs right the
people have to choose between the tough choices and it because they are facing moral
temptation (Adeleye and et.al., 2020). Thus, issue like this in business ethics is very common
and due to that people face difficulty. Along with this, it has been found that most of the
discrimination is face by women in the workplace. Moreover, company can reduce the impact of
this issue by fairly treating their employees with equality and provide them with good
opportunity. There should be In order to educated workers about the type of discrimination
and legal action that can be taken towards it.
CONCLUSION
From the above report it has been concluded that ethics is very important for individual and
business as it acts as guiding path for the company. Along with this, ever firm has to follow
this set of rules in order to avoid the intervention of government. One of the most common
issue in business ethic is discrimination and harassment that is faced by employee at
workplace.

REFERENCES
Books and journals
Adeleye, I. and et.al., 2020. Business ethics in Africa: the role of institutional context, social
relevance, and development challenges. Journal of business ethics.161(4). pp.717-729.
Aitchison, G. and Meckled-Garcia, S., 2021. Against online public shaming: Ethical problems
with mass social media. Social Theory and Practice. 47(1). pp.1-31.
Gardner, J. M. and Allen, T. C., 2019. Keep calm and tweet on: legal and ethical considerations
for pathologists using social media. Archives of pathology & laboratory
medicine. 143(1). pp.75-80.
Kelly, E. M. and et.al., 2021. When rules are not enough: Developing principles to guide ethical
conduct. Behavior Analysis in Practice. 14(2). pp.491-498.
Sroka, W. and Szántó, R., 2018. Corporate social responsibility and business ethics in
controversial sectors: Analysis of research results. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and
Innovation.14(3). pp.111-126.
1