Analyzing RBS's Sustainability Failure: A Detailed Case Study

Verified

Added on  2023/06/13

|15
|626
|474
Case Study
AI Summary
This case study examines the sustainability failure of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), tracing its roots back to its establishment in 1727 and subsequent expansion. The analysis identifies key factors contributing to the bank's collapse, including its capital and liquidity positions, uncertainties in asset quality, losses in credit trading activities, and the acquisition of ABN AMRO. The study highlights the inadequate capital levels, reliance on short-term wholesale funding, deterioration in market confidence, and poor management decisions as critical vulnerabilities. Ultimately, the case study provides valuable lessons regarding risk assessment, decision-making processes, and the importance of maintaining a strong equity base, emphasizing the need for institutions to prioritize liquidity and seek independent advice on significant transactions. Desklib provides access to similar case studies and solved assignments for students.
Document Page
SUSTAINABILITY FAILURE: RBS
STUDENT NAME
University Name
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
ABOUT RBS
Set up in 1727 in Edinburg
First branch was set in 1783
Expanded in England in 1874
Today, it has its presence in UK & Ireland,
Europe, Asia Pacific, and United States
In 2007-08, divestment of RBS was
proposed
308 branches in England and 6 Natwest
branches were divested by RBS (RBS 2018)
Document Page
WHY DID RBS FAIL?
Capital Position of RBS
Liquidity position
Uncertainties in asset quality
Losses in credit trading activity
ABN ABRO’s acquisition
Overall systemic crisis
Document Page
CAPITAL POSITION OF RBS
RBS issued £12 billion rights in 2008
RBS’s capital position in 2007 – 8%
This is was the minimum requirement and RBS met that.
Lost of trust among investors and funders
Acquired ABN ABRO. Acquisition through Debt and not equity
Change in regulations – Hold 9.5% equity to operate without
restrictions on dividends and other distributions
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
CAPITAL POSITION OF RBS CONTD…
Regulatory system allowed banks like RBS to run
with inherent uncertainties
Trading book risks were inadequately evaluated
(FSA 2011)
Document Page
RBS’S LIQUIDITY POSITION
Banks and financial institutions were
not willing to meet the financial needs
of RBS
Short-term wholesale funding gap
increased. It was visible clearly from
July 2018
(FSA 2011)
Document Page
ASSET QUALITY: CONCERNS &
UNCERTAINTIES
Loss of market confidence as credit quality reduced
Credit trading losses amounted to £12.2 billion in
2008
Large loan loss provisions in Autumn 2008
(FSA 2011)
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
LOSS IN CREDIT TRADING ACTIVITIES
Due to structured credit risks, exposure to monoline
bond insurers and leveraged finance
Also due to boom and bust of US housing credit
market and Sub-prime credit
Expansion of structured credit business aggressively
in 2006.
Assessment of losses increased over a period of time
Document Page
ABN ABRO’S ACQUISITION
27.2 billion to acquire ABN ABRO’s
certain businesses
Exposure to risk trading assets
Acquisition through debt and not equity
No anticipation in place to understand if ABN ABRO
doesn’t meet regulatory capital requirements
Consortium leader for ABN ABRO’s acquisition
Document Page
SYSTEMATIC VULNERABILITIES AND
CONFIDENCE COLLAPSE
Inadequate levels of capital
Short-term wholesale funding
Deterioration in market confidence
Poor management decisions
Funding needs of the bank wasn’t met
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
POOR MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Low priority to liquidity
Imperfect analysis and judgement
CEO’s management style was poor
No questions on the strategy proposal
(FSA 2011)
Document Page
LESSONS LEARNT FROM RBS FAILURE
Seek independent advice on the viability of
significant transactions
Strong network should be build with the
chairman
Detailed and structured briefing material should
be produced for decision making
Risk assessment should be undertaken
periodically
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 15
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]