Case Study: Apple's CSR Policies, Labor Rights, and Supply Chain

Verified

Added on  2023/06/05

|13
|546
|480
Case Study
AI Summary
This case study analyzes Apple's Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies, highlighting ethical challenges within the company, particularly concerning labor rights and supply chain management. It addresses issues such as long working hours in Chinese factories, conflicts within the company, and environmental policies. Surveys conducted by the organization revealed problems such as excessive working hours, child labor issues, and workers' health and safety concerns, including instances of poisoning and suicides. The analysis covers labor and human rights violations, including the employment of underage workers and explosions in Foxconn. Post-conflict, Apple refined its age verification methods, improved its supply management chain, and strengthened worker health and safety measures. The report suggests more transparency and clarity regarding the standpoints of Foxconn and Wintek workers, advocating for motivational leadership programs to enhance the company's ethical standing. Desklib provides access to similar case studies and solved assignments for students.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
APPLIED BUSINESS ETHICS
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF APPLE
Market leader in technology industry
Name in the NASDAQ Global Select Stock
Exchange
Variety of electronic products and services
Trusted employees all across the world
Document Page
CSR POLICIES OF APPLE
Overcoming the risks within the business
performance
Strict actions against corruption and bribery
Maintaining the ethical codes of conduct
Employee discrimination not encouraged
Document Page
THE DESCRIPTION OF THE
SITUATION
Conflicts within the company
Environmental policies and climate change
Long working hours in Chinese factories
Problems in internal management
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
SURVEYS BY THE ORGANIZATION
Military approach in the organization
Interviews with the labors of Foxconn
Child labor issues
Excessive working hours
Workers had to work for around 70 hours
Workers could not enjoy the facilities given to
them because of the long working hours
Committing suicides by many workers
Document Page
ANALYSIS OF LABOR AND HUMAN
RIGHTS
Explosion in Foxconn
Issues of labor violations
Employment of underage workers
Arrangement of training programs
Document Page
ANALYSIS OF APPLE CONFLICTS
Shortage of labors in factories
Guidelines for employment of underage
workers
Child Labor Remediation Program
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
ANALYSIS ONWORKERS HEALTH
AND SAFETY
Securing the health of the employees
Poisoning of the workers by n-hexane
Resignation of the employees
Document Page
APPLE CSR POLICY POST-
CONFLICTS
Refinement of age verification methods
Improving the brand reputation of Apple
Stress on the supply management chain
Strengthening health and safety of workers
Document Page
APPLE ANNUAL REPORT
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
SUGGESTIONS OF MAKING THE
CASE BETTER
More transparency into the matter
More clarity on the standpoint of the Foxconn
and Wintek workers
Motivational leadership programs
Document Page
REFERENCES
Albuquerque, R.A., Durnev, A. and Koskinen, Y., 2013. Corporate social responsibility and firm risk:
Theory and empirical evidence.
Apple.com (2018). Apple. [online] Apple. Available at: https://www.apple.com/ [Accessed 22 Sep.
2018].
Carroll, A.B., 2015. Corporate social responsibility. Organizational dynamics, 44(2), pp.87-96.
Christopher, M., 2016. Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson UK.
Crane, A., Matten, D. and Spence, L., 2013. Corporate social responsibility in a global context.
Monczka, R.M., Handfield, R.B., Giunipero, L.C. and Patterson, J.L., 2015. Purchasing and supply
chain management. Cengage Learning.
Patterson, P., Wilkins, L. and Painter, C., 2018. Media ethics: Issues and cases. Rowman & Littlefield.
Sodhi, M.S. and Tang, C.S., 2012. Strategic approaches for mitigating supply chain risks. In Managing
supply chain risk(pp. 95-108). Springer, Boston, MA.
Tai, F.M. and Chuang, S.H., 2014. Corporate social responsibility. Ibusiness, 6(03), p.117.
Wisner, J.D., Tan, K.C. and Leong, G.K., 2014. Principles of supply chain management: A balanced
approach. Cengage Learning.

Document Page
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 13
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
logo.png

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]