A Comprehensive Report on Apple Company's CSR and Sustainability

This report provides an executive summary and in-depth analysis of Apple Company's Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and sustainability report, evaluating its adherence to corporate information principles. The report examines Apple's CSR practices, stakeholder engagement, implications for financial decision-making, and reporting issues. It highlights the company's performance across various CSR pillars, including community, employees, environment, and governance. The analysis covers the importance of sustainability reporting, its implications for stakeholders, and the role of the Apple Company in standardizing reporting guidelines. The report also offers recommendations for improving Apple's CSR initiatives and concludes by emphasizing the value of sustainability reports for demonstrating a company's commitment to social responsibility. The report also provides a detailed discussion on the key findings and recommendations for future improvements, based on the analysis of Apple's current CSR practices.

1
Name:
Course
Professor’s name
University name
City, State
Date of submission

2
Executive summary
Apple Company criteria value, according to a certain proportion, the contents of the
sustainability report - profile, accounting and information policies, vision and strategy,
governance structure , management and performance systems - and the adequacy of the report to
8 principles of corporate information - clarity, clarity, comparability, periodicity, completeness,
verifiability, reliability and general impression. - Consider the above criteria and strive to
compete in prestigious competitions a great way to ensure the development of a quality
sustainability memory, gaining in reputation and opening the possibility of our efforts being
recognized. Sustainability reports are a fundamental tool for the company committed to this
socially responsible approach in that it provides society in general, and more specifically to
stakeholders or stakeholders, with clear and standardized information of its business activities
from the triple economic, social and environmental dimension.

3
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
Issues and Practices.........................................................................................................................4
Stakeholders in sustainability reporting...........................................................................................5
Implications for various stakeholders in relation to financial decision making..............................6
Sustainability reporting issues.........................................................................................................7
Findings...........................................................................................................................................8
Corporate Social Responsibility Report Recommendations............................................................9
Conclusions......................................................................................................................................9
References......................................................................................................................................10

4
Introduction
Apple Company is a distributor and manufacturer of personal computers, mobile phones and
tablet computers as well as applications and software’s that was established in 1977 and is based
in Cupertino in California.
Apple Company sustainability report
The sustainable development and social responsibility of the company are currently among the
most innovative topics of research and business management.
Today, differentiation in a saturated or especially competitive market can come from the
perception of the client and other stakeholders (employees, investors, suppliers, local
communities, etc.) regarding the social and environmental merits of the company. In this way,
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) comes into play as a competitive advantage (Robinson et
al., 2015).
Corporate social responsibility represents a commitment to basic values and behavior consistent
with these approaches. The perspective of CSR is oriented towards three objectives - economic,
social and environmental - grouped under the neologism 'sustainability', understood as the
capacity to generate sustainable development or of an integral and multipurpose character.
Transparency and verifiability are recognized qualities among the principles of corporate social

5
responsibility. They are fundamental rules that govern the socially responsible behavior of
organizations.
Issues and Practices
The company’s CSR is 62% compared to other companies in America. This is a good rating as it
is highly satisfactory in terms of service delivery in social responsibility. CSR has four pillars,
the community pillar, employees pillar, environment pillar and governance pillar. Its score in
environmental management is the highest at 70%, it is then followed by employee management
at 61%, the governance pillar is rated at 58% and lastly the community pillar which is placed at
56% (Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Restructuring and Firm's Performance, 2010).
They take form in the information on CSR offered by the companies, which is presented in the
form of the so-called "sustainability reports" or "corporate social responsibility reports".
Although it is necessary to distinguish that in the first case the memory is structured by
emphasizing the triple dimension (economic, social or environmental) and in the second,
information is organized by distinguishing one by one the interest groups.
Exposing the relationship between market mechanisms, the achievement of sustainability and the
effectiveness of the company's policies for this purpose is the main work of sustainability
information.
This information must be able to be constituted from the most elementary levels, considering the

6
action of individuals and organizations, to the most complex, taking sustainability into account
from a planetary point of view. The difficulty of measuring the situation and the progress of
sustainable development can be mitigated by assessing and reporting on social, environmental
and economic impacts(Haerens and Zott, 2014).
The measurement of sustainability must consider the process of internalizing external costs (and
benefits). Among the main drivers of disclosure are market forces such as reputation and risk,
competitive advantage, the possibility of attracting socially responsible investments, and the
restriction on operations that may be derived from government action, as well as their social
legitimacy.
For Apple Company, the elaboration of a sustainability report implies making a company's
efforts regarding social and environmental issues much more visible.
Stakeholders in sustainability reporting
Communicating the company's social responsibility policy entails advantages such as enhancing
relations with financial suppliers through greater transparency - thus improving access to capital
-, offering a clearer understanding of the company to customers, opening up innovation in
products and services by observing the needs of the consumer from a new angle, motivate
employees through an ethical commitment, discover opportunities to save energy costs, raw
materials or environmental responsibility, and prevent breaches or future adjustments to labor or
environmental regulations(Manos and Derori, 2016) .

7
There is a stable debate among those in favor of standardizing information on sustainability and
those who advocate total flexibility for the company. The standardization of reports on corporate
social responsibility is justified mainly by two reasons. The first is that stakeholders in corporate
activity and society as a whole demand that documents published by different companies be
comparable to each other. The second is that the possibility of comparing the activity of the
companies in the social and environmental fields is a demonstration of value for the
shareholders, as well as an improvement in the information processes within the
market(Allouche, 2006).
Implications for various stakeholders in relation to financial decision making
Improve the transparency of sustainability reports and harmonize its criteria will generally imply
a better appreciation of corporate social responsibility policies. The main organization involved
in the process of standardizing the reports is the aforementioned Apple Company. The company
is an independent institution whose mission is to develop and disseminate guidelines for the
elaboration of sustainability reports. Currently, its guidelines serve as a basis for all those
companies that seek to make their socially responsible policies known in a global and generally
accepted way. Innovation in the development of sustainability reports, the creation of digital
solutions and the implementation of education and accreditation programs. The above
components have been designed to follow five objectives: . Integrate information processes
under the standards with the internal management and management processes of the company.
Simplify 'guides' so reports can be compared efficiently. Advance the harmonization of the
guidelines with other elements of the general corporate responsibility system, thus enhancing the
compatibility of resources and tools (Perrini, Pogutz and Tencati, 2006). Facilitate the

8
implementation and use of the guides, as well as supply the appropriate support material and
tools for the process.
Sustainability reporting issues
To this we must add the free choice of a large number of companies, from large multinationals to
small non-profit organizations and associations, to Apple Company guidelines as a basis for
structuring their sustainability reports. the bet of so many and so many companies can only mean
that either there is no clear alternative or between the different possibilities the guidelines of the
Apple Company are the ones that best suit your needs. A choice free of value by those directly
interested. Some critics also maintain that the Apple company guidelines for the development of
sustainability reports are not very rigorous. It is important to point out, in defense of the, that
sustainability information systems are - as the whole movement implies corporate social
responsibility - still subject to continuous development and experimentation. The rigor and
reliability will go reaching the maturity of the subject and after pooling the experience of all
stakeholders (issuers and recipients of information).
It is interesting to highlight, among the numerous awards that reward CSR information policies
and processes, the Award for the Best Sustainability Report for American companies promoted
by the
The most positive aspects of these reports are a well-defined strategy and a good description of
the sustainability profile of the organization, the introduction of some negative aspects, the

9
establishment of objectives in the field of CSR for the following year and principles of
information clearly set and integrated throughout the report(Perrini, Pogutz and Tencati, 2006).
In addition, some of the reports were verified according to high standards of assurance.
Findings
Despite not being exempt of some weak point - much extension, some data little relevant and
small problems in the definition of the scope, fruit of the scope of activity - can be considered
that the award-winning sustainability reports are kept in line with the latest trends in
sustainability information.
Measuring sustainable yield
After evaluating the indicators, a new business perspective for management can be drawn from
them. Based on the information obtained, the long-term objectives and the action plan to
influence sustainability performance can be traced(Perrini, Pogutz and Tencati, 2006).
Communicate
After knowing the social and environmental past of the company, and once the socially
responsible strategy for the future has been planned, the forms of information and the media that
best adapt to the nature of the organization must be chosen. The report will be written and
disseminated according to the strategy and method chosen. To be truly effective a sustainability
report should allow stakeholders to comment, recommend and critique both their presentation
and its content. Comments should be compiled with a view to establishing a process of

10
continuous improvement in sustainability: (O'Grady, 2009). The valuations of memory should
affect the company's social responsibility policy, influencing the preparation of future reports. It
should not be forgotten that a sustainability report is, in addition to a tool for communication
with stakeholders, a way of distinguishing the organization against its competitors.
Corporate Social Responsibility Report Recommendations
Since its launch in 2006, the company has been guided by its core values and has consistently
aligned its commercial and financial performance with the responsible form in which it operates.
By integrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) in a holistic manner into the business, the
company grew as a responsible corporate citizen delivering consistent results as one of the
world's best performing hotel companies.
In the company's annual sustainability report, the 2016-2017 Sustainability Responsibility Report
details its strong manufacturing-leading commitment to responsible business practices vis-à-vis
society and the environment. Throughout the report, the successes achieved by the teams in each
CSR area are highlighted: sustainability, diversity and inclusion, philanthropy, human rights and
responsible business practices.
Conclusions
The Sustainability Reports are the perfect tool to demonstrate to third party the efforts made by
an organization in the field of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). To do this, they focus on
communicating and managing the positive and negative impacts of the organization on society,
and adopt necessary measures to empower the former and minimize the latter (O'Grady, 2009).

11
Therefore the Sustainability Report is a tool to communicate the economic, social, and
environmental and governance performance of the same.
References
Allouche, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave
Macmillan.

12
Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Restructuring and Firm's Performance. (2010).
Gardners Books.
Cragg, W., Schwartz, M. and Weitzner, D. (n.d.). Corporate social responsibility.
Haerens, M. and Zott, L. (2014). Corporate social responsibility. Detroit: Greenhaven Press.
Jamali, D., Karam, C. and Blowfield, M. (n.d.). Development-oriented corporate social
responsibility.
Manos, R. and Derori, I. (2016). Corporate responsibility. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave
Macmillan.
O'Grady, J. (2009). Apple Inc.. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Perrini, F., Pogutz, S. and Tencati, A. (2006). Developing corporate social responsibility.
Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Robinson, T., Henry, E., Pirie, W., Broihahn, M. and Cope, A. (2015). International Financial
Statement Analysis. Somerset: Wiley.
Schreck, P. (2009). The business case for corporate social responsibility. Heidelberg: Physica-
Verlag.