This presentation examines the legal battle between Apple and the U.S. government following the San Bernardino attacks, where the FBI sought Apple's assistance in unlocking an iPhone belonging to one of the perpetrators. Apple resisted, citing concerns about creating a vulnerability that could be exploited by various agencies and compromise user data. The presentation outlines the FBI's objectives, Apple's reasons for resisting, and the eventual outcome where Apple was asked to patch the vulnerability used by the FBI. The incident is highlighted as a significant clash in the debate over encryption and data privacy, discussing the pros and cons of Apple's stance, including the protection of user data versus the FBI's need for vital information. The presentation concludes by referencing sources that provide further context on the San Bernardino public safety response and user experiences with software update messages.