Arabic vs. Chinese Writing Systems: A Detailed Linguistic Analysis

This report provides a comparative analysis of the Arabic and Chinese writing systems, highlighting their origins, characteristics, and unique features. It delves into the historical context of both systems, tracing the Arabic script back to the Nabataean tribal community and the Chinese system to the legendary figure Cangjie. The report examines the phonetic structures, logograms, syllabary aspects, and segmentation processes of each language, noting the complexities and differences in their symbolic representations. It further discusses the evolution of Chinese characters from pictograms to stylized forms and the standardization efforts in both writing systems. The study concludes by emphasizing that understanding one writing system does not automatically translate to comprehension of another due to the inherent differences in their symbolic concepts and structures. Desklib provides access to this and many other solved assignments.

Running head:ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:

1ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
Introduction
The emergence of writing system further known as script, characters or orthography is
regarded as one of the most significant achievements to humankind. According to Perfetti and
Harris (2013), the art of primitive tool making to the days of contemporary expertise, it has been
believed that homo sapiens have travelled a long way in order to reinstate ancient stones and
bricks to pen and paper and even advanced electronic gadgets in recent times. Eminent authors
like Saiegh-Haddad and Henkin-Roitfarb (2014) mentioned that without the emergence of
writing, the development of human civilization and knowledge would not have been achievable
have mentioned it. This paper will intend to focus on two of the major writing systems of the
world namely, the Arabic writing system and the Chinese writing system. In addition to this, the
report will further shed light on the origin, characteristics of these two writing system by
evaluating their respective phonetics, logograms, segments as well as signs in order to implicitly
understand the two writing systems.
Section
Section 1: Arabic Writing System
According to Sahlolet al. (2014), the foundation of the Arabic writing system can be
traced to the conceptualization of inscription and writing of the people belonging to the semi-
nomadic Nabataean tribal community, who colonized the southern region of Syria and Jordan,
along with other areas such as Northern Arabia as well as the Sinai Peninsula. It has been
believed that the stone inscriptions existing in writings of Nabataean reveal immense likenesses
to the contemporary form of Arabic writing method. As per Blucheet al. (2014), Arabic scripting
system comprises mostly of consonants and vowel along with the certain level of modifications

2ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
on the similar fundamental letter shapes utilized to create a representation of a varied number of
resonance and sounds. The alphabetical range of Arabic system includes eighteen figures and
shapes that express around twenty-eight phonetic sounds by the aid of diacritical symbols.
Arabic is written from the right hand side continuing to the left. While the figures or numbers are
written from left to right. However, Perfetti and Harris (2013) noted that until the beginning of
twentieth century, the concept of punctuation marks was not implemented. Furthermore, short
vowels, which are signified by a range of symbols and marks, positioned below or above the
letters facilitate in the process of pronunciation as well as articulation of a word. They further
stated that these set of symbols are only present in the Quran, ‘the holy book of Islam’, whereby
there is immense significance of proper recitation and citations are essential for the beginners or
novice readers. The alphabets of the Arab language according to Saiegh-Haddad and Henkin-
Roitfarb (2014), further regarded as ‘Arabiyyah’ is referred as scripts or writings used to inscribe
a large numbers of languages in varied geographical regions. However, the Modern Standard
Arabic Method of Writing is regarded as a standardized as well as literary form of the language
that is used in majority of the formal speech across the Arab region in order to facilitate effective
communication. According to Rojo (2014), the Modern Standard Arabic is considered as an
esteemed variety. Brierleyet al.(2016) formulate the concept of Diglossia that is a term used for
two different variations of similar language is characteristically regarded as a division in purpose
and utilization between MSA and the nationwide spoken range of Arabic language. However,
being employed in formal as well as official contexts, MSA is not widely used by the Arabic
speakers during a regular means of interpersonal communication.

3ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
Section 2: Chinese Writing System
The Chinese writing system is regarded as the most complex form of language, which
does not comprise an alphabet that is a set of figures and characters representing several units of
sound and resonance. As per Henderson (2013),this type of writing system comprises an
unrestricted set of symbols and fonts representing a word. Chinese writing system requires
several set of characters, symbols and fonts in order to represent each of its distinctive
morphemes. This writing system has been considered as the oldest form of writing system
existing in the world. However, Wei (2014) noted that according to old Chinese legendary
scripts, Cangjie a historian official was responsible for its invention under the regime of
legendary emperor Huangdi during 2600BC. Andersonet al. (2013) conceptualized that written
Chinese inscriptions are regarded as a script of ideograms, which can be characterized into six
broad categories such as pictogram or figures, ideograph, logical collective, pictophonetic
compounds as well as associate alteration. Williams (2016), noted that the scripted form of
Chinese characters are regarded as ‘hànzì’ which are considered to be formerly images of
humans, animals and several other things. However,these Chinese characters have transformed
gradually into a more stylized form and do not have comprised any resemblance of the things,
which they used to represent. Tianet al. (2015) mentioned in his writing that among the 56,000
Chinese fonts and symbols that are in existence, the major section of these characters would be
incomprehensible and vague to the classic and typical Chinese reader. He further mentioned that
a distinctive Chinese who reads would only require acquiring 3000 fonts and characters in order
to learn Chinese language. There lies a dispute in learning the ways to read as well as inscribe
thousands of characters comprising the Chinese language. As per Perfetti and Harris (2013), this
has further led to the generalization of Chinese writing method initiated by the People’s Republic

4ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
of China (PRC) in 1956, which has been recognized in the process of colonization as well as
translation industry called “Chinese”. Tranter (2013) took into account that in this process
around 2000 fonts of Chinese writing system had been simplified to read as well as write.
However, in recent times, Chinese is consideredas a standardized form of writing by the PRC
barring Hong Kong and Singapore, whereby the conventional or traditional form of Chinese
method is still regarded as the standard language system for regions such as Hong Kong, Taiwan
along with Macau.
Subsection
Arabic Writing System
(I) Phonetics- According to Sahlolet al. (2014), Arabic writing system comprises of almost 30
phonetically unique consonant segments along with six vowels. However, in terms of the range
of consonants, the Arabic writing system can be positioned within the range of 20- 37
subdivisions whereas, other languages are likely to be varying towards 20-27 resonance.
However, Perfetti and Harris (2013) noted if more than 20 Arabic geminates can be incorporated,
the overall sections in Arabic writing system reaches a range of 53 that is considered to be more
twice the means for the language system across the world.
(II) Logograms- It has widely understood that Arabic script is not only implemented to write the
language of Arab. Brierley et al.(2016) noted mentioned that several other languages namely,
Urdu, Persian, Sindhi as well as Malay can be sited as instances that use Arabic scripts in their
writing method. However, this language system does not reveal any logographic signs.
(III) Syllabary- According to Rojo (2014), Arabic characters can be written in two varied
alphabetic orthographies, a voweled intensely swallow and the other one that in unvoweled that

5ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
has immense depth because of the deficientphonological detailed information when short vowels
are absent or being omitted.
(IV) Segments- As per Saiegh-Haddad (2014), Segmentation of Urdu script while scripting in
Nasta’liq writing technique is considered a comprehensive task because of the complexities of
writing techniques in comparison to the Naskh writing technique.It must be noted that the Arabic
writing recognition has gathered the awareness because of its challenging nature.
(V) Signs and Symbols- Vowels and symbols belonging to the Arabic language, resemble
dashes and symbols positioned below or above the Arabic letters to articulate the pronunciation
of the language in a correct manner. Saiegh-Haddad provided an instance, “the word
‘Shariba’that is to drink or consume is similar to /shrb/ but have incorporated distinctive
symbols to the readers and listeners to simplify the words”.
Chinese Writing System
(I) Phonetics- The most popular Chinese phonetic systems are the Zhuyin alphabet and Hanyu
Pinyin. As per Henderson (2013), it must be noted that Chinese employ these two phonetic
methods primarily to learn the enunciation and pronunciation of the language and not in form of
a writing system. Among these two Pinyin is regarded as the most commonly used phonetics in
Mainland China. This phonetic system immensely aids the complex form of language easier to
comprehend for meaning of the characters to foreigners and the ones unknown to the language.
(II) Logograms- Anderson et al. (2013) mentioned that Chinese language can be sited as an
exceptional example of logographic system whereby each of the Chinese symbols and characters
signifies a single unit of meaning or morpheme along with a sole segment of speech. However,
Chinese has eventually adapted a characteristic progress of logographic writing method. Initially

6ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
images were used in order to comprehend thoughts and ideas, however recently, symbols and
characters are used to demonstrate specific connotations and ideas. For example, a sword symbol
can be used to express anger.
(III) Syllabary- As per Tranter (2013), the systematic method of sound in Chinese language is
manifested by the use of tones and resonance in order to specify the differences of connotations
between words or syllables. Chinese words generally comprises of one syllable, however
contemporary Chinese style employs compound language with higher numbers of suffixes.
(IV) Segments- Tianet al. (2015) stated that Chinese character segmentation is referred as a key
factor of recognition. The rate of accuracy of segmentation of Chinese fonts and characters plays
a vital role for the performance of Chinese font’s recognition method.
(V) Signs and Symbols- Wei 2014 acknowledged that signs and symbols are regarded as
innovative technique of communication because of its magnificence as well as functionality.
This form of language is taken through characters and symbols. In recent times, almost 4000
signs and symbols are used in the process of conveying messages through Chinese language.
Conclusion
Therefore, from the above discussion it can be concluded that an individual’s illiteracy
incorporates the parallel growth of scripted forms of the language known as upper and lower.
The fundamental symbolic concepts of each writing system describe the words of the similar
spoken language. The above discussion has evaluated those essential symbolic concepts vary so
implicitly that knowing a single writing system will not facilitate the ability of speaking the
particular language. The report has focused on the Chinese and Arabic writing systems by

7ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
evaluating the origin, characteristics, logograms, signs, symbols, Syllabary and segmentation of
each of these writing systems.

8ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
References
Anderson, R.C., Ku, Y.M., Li, W., Chen, X., Wu, X. and Shu, H., 2013. Learning to see the
patterns in Chinese characters. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), pp.41-56.
Bluche, T., Louradour, J., Knibbe, M., Moysset, B., Benzeghiba, M.F. and Kermorvant, C.,
2014, April. The a2ia arabic handwritten text recognition system at the open hart2013 evaluation.
In Document Analysis Systems (DAS), 2014 11th IAPR International Workshop on (pp. 161-
165). IEEE.
Brierley, C., Sawalha, M., Heselwood, B. and Atwell, E., 2016. A Verified Arabic-IPA mapping
for Arabic transcription technology, informed by Quranic recitation, traditional Arabic
linguistics, and modern phonetics. Journal of Semitic Studies, 61(1), pp.157-186.
Henderson, E.H., 2013. The interface of lexical competence and knowledge of written words.
In Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy (pp. 15-44).
Routledge.
Perfetti, C.A. and Harris, L.N., 2013. Universal reading processes are modulated by language
and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), pp.296-316.
Rojo, L.M., 2014. Taking over the square: The role of linguistic practices in contesting urban
spaces. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), pp.623-652.
Sahlol, A.T., Suen, C.Y., Elbasyouni, M.R. and Sallam, A.A., 2014. A proposed ocr algorithm
for the recognition of handwritten arabic characters. J. Pattern Recognit. Intell. Syst, pp.8-22.

9ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
Saiegh-Haddad, E. and Henkin-Roitfarb, R., 2014. The structure of Arabic language and
orthography. In Handbook of Arabic literacy (pp. 3-28). Springer, Dordrecht.
Tian, J., Wang, R., Wang, G., Liu, J. and Xia, Y., 2015. A two-stage character segmentation
method for Chinese license plate. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 46, pp.539-553.
Tranter, N., 2013. Logography and layering: A functional cross-linguistic analysis. Written
Language & Literacy, 16(1), pp.1-31.
Wei, B., 2014. The origin and evolvement of Chinese
characters. GdańskieStudiaAzjiWschodniej, 2014(Zeszyt 5), pp.33-44.
Williams, C., 2016. The Chinese Language. In Teaching English Reading in the Chinese-
Speaking World (pp. 19-38). Springer, Singapore.