PPMP20011 Course Portfolio: Week 11 - Argument, Logic, Ethics

This assignment, a portfolio for PPMP20011, covers the topics of argument, logic, and ethics within the context of project management. It analyzes arguments using logic, persuasion, and influence factors as applied to stakeholder agendas, emphasizing the importance of considering the needs of all parties involved. The portfolio differentiates methods of project negotiation, conflict management, and stakeholder engagement across projects, highlighting the primary stakeholders and the need to advance new inventions in the technology sector. It also explains methods for identifying and reconciling inconsistent objectives, using the laws of authority and coexistence to manage relationships. The assignment further discusses the consequences of project delays and methods for handling claims and variations, and it evaluates project management tools for conflict resolution. References include works by Anbari, Kerzner, Peña-Mora, and the Project Management Institute.

(Insert Student Name) / (Insert Student Number) - PPMP20011 Course Portfolio for Week 11
Weekly Portfolio Learning Table
Description of
topics including
reading samples
Learning
outcomes of the
course
Learnings from your experience, this and prior course
reading, assignments
Supporting
documentation
including your
prior learning
Week 11 Topic:
Argument; Logic;
Ethics.
The Internet
Encyclopedia of
Philosophy;
Emotional
Intelligence;
QLD Government
negotiation advice;
YouTube: Popular
Videos – Negotiation;
2. Analyse common
arguments using
logic, persuasion and
influence factors as
commonly applied to
conflicting and/or
competing
stakeholder agendas.
In an organization with conflicting stakeholders, the greater
persuasion and logic factors are to consider the needs of the other
party and compliment them. There can only be an agreement if both
conflicting parties can coexist and tolerate each other and make
their approaches based on facts and logics. Competition can be
healthy, but if it is not managed properly, then an organization
might face disagreements which in the long run lead to failure.
PPMP20011 Course
Profile
PPMP20011 Moodle
Web site
Have you any insights
you can add from other
units you have studies or
readings you’ve made?
Are any of the
activities above
relevant to your
reflections for the
learning outcomes
on the right?
3. Differentiate
methods of project
negotiation, conflict
management, and
stakeholder
engagement across
The primary stakeholders include the management team,
government, employees and external consumers. All the activities
should be conducted in such a way that they encourage the
Have you any insights
you can add from other
units you have studies or
readings you’ve made?
1 of 4

(Insert Student Name) / (Insert Student Number) - PPMP20011 Course Portfolio for Week 11
Description of
topics including
reading samples
Learning
outcomes of the
course
Learnings from your experience, this and prior course
reading, assignments
Supporting
documentation
including your
prior learning
projects consisting of
differing technology
standards and asset
lifecycles.
development and satisfaction of all the parties (Anbari F (Date
Unknown) ). In the technology sector, the methods of stakeholder
management should focus more on advancing new inventions
which benefit all parties in one way or the other.
Are any of the
activities above
relevant to your
reflections for the
learning outcomes
on the right?
4. Explain and apply
methods of
identifying and
reconciling
inconsistent and
conflicting objectives
and drivers that
develop, maintain,
mange relationships
and communication
with key
stakeholders.
Organizations can use the laws of authority and coexistence to
identify and come up with reconciling factors within its team.
Individuals need to know that they are answerable to an authority
and all the set rules must be followed (Kerzner 2013.). Another way
is to encourage group activities as they bring people together and
enhance their communication in a particular area.
Have you any insights
you can add from other
units you have studies or
readings you’ve made?
Are any of the
activities above
relevant to your
reflections for the
learning outcomes
on the right?
5. Explain the
consequences of
project delays,
disruptions, and
changes to planned
activities and the
Some of the consequences caused by delay or postponing of
activities and other interruptions in an organization are interfering
with the team’s progress (Peña-Mora 2001.). Each department has a
Have you any insights
you can add from other
units you have studies or
readings you’ve made?
2 of 4

(Insert Student Name) / (Insert Student Number) - PPMP20011 Course Portfolio for Week 11
Description of
topics including
reading samples
Learning
outcomes of the
course
Learnings from your experience, this and prior course
reading, assignments
Supporting
documentation
including your
prior learning
methods for claims
variations, liquidated
damages, contract
entitlements, and
arbitration.
timetable of how they want to conduct their activities and delaying
important issues like finances and resources might drag all the
arrangements behind.
Are any of the
activities above
relevant to your
reflections for the
learning outcomes
on the right?
6. Evaluate project
management tools
that help avoid or
provide conflict
resolution via
negotiated solutions.
Some of the management tools considered in conflict resolution are
encouraging team work, giving all people an equal chance of
participation and coexisting (PMI. 2013). An organization should
be able to work together despite their different views and also learn
to tolerate each other knowing that each has a great role in the
development of the company.
Have you any insights
you can add from other
units you have studies or
readings you’ve made?
3 of 4

(Insert Student Name) / (Insert Student Number) - PPMP20011 Course Portfolio for Week 11
References
Anbari F.T., Giammalvo P., Jaffe P., Letavec C., and Merchant R. (Date Unknown) “The Chunnel Project”. PMI Case Studies in Project Management.
http://www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/Academic/case%20studies/Chunnel%20Project.ashx Visited …../…/…
Kerzner H. 2013.Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Control, 11th Edition. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Peña-Mora F., and Tamaki T. 2001. "Effect of Delivery Systems on Collaborative Negotiations for Large -Scale Infrastructure Projects”. Journal of
Management in Engineering. Vol:April 2001 pp.105-121
PMI. 2013a.A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) 5th Edition. USA: Project Management Institute.
4 of 4