Project Scope and Stakeholders: ARTC Case Study, MAN 5401

This case study analyzes the 'Ander Reach Treatment Complex' (ARTC) project in Apple Vale, Australia, focusing on project scope, constraints, and management principles. The project aims to construct a two-story treatment complex to revitalize the town's economy and provide quality healthcare services. The scope encompasses detailed facility requirements for both in-patients and out-patients, including treatment rooms, administrative offices, staff areas, and various amenities like a fitness suite, parking, and utilities. The study outlines project assumptions, constraints (time, scope, cost, and quality), dependencies, and business options. It also covers the expected benefits, dis-benefits, timescale, cost, investment appraisal, and major risks associated with the project. The case study emphasizes the application of project management practices to ensure successful project execution within the predetermined budget and timeline, considering the economic context of Apple Vale and the charitable trust, Tun Therapy, driving the initiative.

Running head: ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
MAN 5401 Managing Project Scope: Ander Reach Treatment Complex
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:

1ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Executive summary
This project reflects the construction practices and processes to be followed while constructing
the “Ander Reach Treatment Complex” in Apple Vale. In order to overcome the current
economic downturn challenges the Project is proposed by Tun Therapy to give quality services
and facilities to the in patients and out patients. The project scope, constraints, assumptions, risk
factors and expected benefit from the project are also elaborated in the Overall business case.

2ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Table of Contents
Project Scope...................................................................................................................................3
Project assumptions.........................................................................................................................5
Project constraints............................................................................................................................5
Project dependencies.......................................................................................................................7
Reasons............................................................................................................................................8
Business Options.............................................................................................................................8
Expected benefits...........................................................................................................................10
Expected Dis-benefits....................................................................................................................11
Timescale.......................................................................................................................................11
Cost................................................................................................................................................13
Investment appraisal......................................................................................................................15
Major risks.....................................................................................................................................16
References......................................................................................................................................20

3ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Project Scope
This paper portrays the essential use of project management principles and project
management prcatices to evaluate and execute any project in a predetermined budget and
timeline. The business case scenario considered here is related to Apple Vale a small coastal
town that is 300 Km far from north Perth, Australia. The town does not have any wide source of
income except farming and tourism. However, due to its tranquil and pollution free environment
the town is successful to grab huge numbers of older as well as wealthier tourists. Tun Therapy is
a charitable trust located besides Vale College has proposed to refurbish the current center and
develop a new complex in the location.
The scope of the project is to develop and construct a new building “Ander Reach
Treatment Complex”, a two storey treatment complex for patients. The center will be capable to
treat both the in patients and out patients. The ARTC building will be designed to cater people
who will stay here, for the staffs and also for the visitors. Some of the staffs will always be
present in the site to serve for day and night. The project scope is to arrange facilities for the
staffs patients and visitors. It requires elevators for those patients who have movement issues or
who uses wheelchairs. The sizes of the treatment rooms will be big to make sure that it will
provide the patients enough space to relax and sleep well and also can receive those who will
come to visit the patient. In order to support the treatment operations it will require o
administrative office.
The other scope of this complex building project are to accommodate enough facilities in
terms of single bed, telephone, persona locker, bedside table, en suite shower, toilet, wardrobe,
chair, Television, wi fi connection, table or a desk and an emergency calling button for atleast 50

4ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
patients. The complex will have 10 individual rooms for treatment. The in patients additional
service will be massage counseling and homeopathy. There will be 5 additional classrooms for
joint counseling. The classrooms must accommodate 10 patients once a time to attend the
workshop session. There will be a large common social area including lunge, dining room, TV
rooms, library, quite space and a private garden. The staff area will be comprises of staff
lockers, staff classrooms that can accommodate 8 people, staff meal preparation area, 4 numbers
of staff meeting rooms, 10 offices, staff shower and staff toilets. The kitchen will offer 24X7
commercial grade catering facility for meal services to the patients.
The Kitchen will require gas ranges, ovens, waste disposal boxes, catering staff facilities,
freezer, food storage, chef office room, wash rooms, storage and facilities for staff catering
service providers with toilets and shower rooms. There will be 20 numbers of out-patients
treatment rooms. Theses rooms will be used for other purposes as well like lows level medical
exams, acupuncture, and homeopathy, massage and counseling sessions. However for the out-
patients there will be large 6 numbers of joint counseling classrooms. These rooms must
accommodate 15 patients at a time to attend the workshop session.
The minor medical treatment facilities facilitates for the out patients include weighing,
blood pressure checking, body fluid taking to test etc. There will also be a public toilet and
showers, medicine dispensary with a secure storage for prescribed drugs, a very small public
restaurant with a commercial kitchen that can accommodate 30 customers. The other scope of
the project is to design a fitness suite that can accommodate 20 patients. The fitness suite will
offer gymnasium, cardio machines, trade mill, cross trainers, weight machines, swimming pool,
spa and spa and shower. The reception and administrative offices include patient record keeping
storage also. Last but not the least the other scope of this project is to design and construct a car

5ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
parking system that can park 200 cars, emergency ambulance right of entry bay, gardening, site
maintenance, deliveries, waste disposal, on site utilities (in terms of water treatment, fire alarm,
electric generator, computer room, record storage, workshop and water storage as well).
Project assumptions
It is assumed that successful delivery of the project will be able to accommodate and
provide effective services to both the in patients, staffs and out patients of Apple Vale.
Project constraints
For different projects the project constraints also differs a lot. However identification of
project constraints at the project initiation phase is very essential to arrange the project
deliverables and project development activities accurately (Erdogan, Šaparauskas & Turskis,
2017). Project management constraints are basically the limitations or the boundaries that is set
by the project supervisor at the project initial phase. In order to achieve the project goals and
objectives the project needs to be completed in the boundary line. It will also help the project to
avoid unfortunate risks. While developing a project plan the project managers are needed to be
conscious about the boundaries (Kerzner, 2018). The common project constraints that are
considered for this particular ARTC construction project are elaborated below:
Time: The final deliverable or due date of the construction project is assumed to be on
October, 2020. It is also identified that the time constraints can be negotiated but can never
overcome completely (Mishakova, Vakhrushkina, Murgul & Sazonova, 2016).
Scope: It is expected that the complex will consider all the above mentioned scope
criteria. The scope of the project is to build new treatment complex for both in patients and out

6ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
patients besides Vale College, neighbourhood farm and a large play ground. The building must
have good catering facilities for the visitors, patients and day and night working staffs. The
complex construction plan is proposed by Tun Therapies and the sponsor of the project is also
the Tun Therapy itself. In order to be updated about the under treatment patients conditions a
record keeping system will also be there operated by the admin in administrative office area
(Banihashemi, Hosseini, Golizadeh & Sankaran, 2017).
Some of the services will be different for the in-patient and out patients but both
categories will be treated with equal care. The complex will provide wi fi services for the patient,
staffs and visitors. There will large treatment rooms, workshop classroom, additional services
like massage, counseling, homeopathy etc. Not only this but also there will be small common
public toilet and shower as well. The other important scope for the project is to construct a large
parking lot that can accommodate 200 cars along with a easy entry exit bay for the emergency
ambulance.
Development of some other on site utilities are also part of the project scope that include
record storage, workshop, computer room, water storage, fire extinguisher, gardening, site
maintenance space, waste disposal, water storage treatment and also an electric generator for
emergency power supply. The treatment complex building project is assumed to take
approximately 158*120m area. As soon as the complex area will be developed Apple vale will
start marketing it. The project scope can be sometime negotiated however if the project
supervisor plans to do something additional too then, that are also needed to be accomplished in
the assigned time (Ahmed, 2018).

7ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Cost: Total budget and cost predicted for the project is $100,000. Considering project
activities the budget needs to be planned (Erdogan, Šaparauskas & Turskis, 2017). The
responsibility of project sponsor and Tun Therapy is to design the cost structure and budget
based on the activities expected to complete the complex construction work. The planned budget
may not be equal to the actual budget but the variance needs to be kept as little as possible.
Quality: Quality is the ultimate limitation on project deliverable. The scope considered
for the complex building project must meet the expected plan and components to meet the
quality level expectations (Bourne, 2016). Project quality can be maintained followed by proper
risk management risk treatment program, and procurement management plan as well.
Project dependencies
The project is dependent on the following:
 Project budget
 Project timescale
 Project scope
 Probable risks and its mitigation strategies
 Procurement plan
 Construction tools and techniques selected
 Suppliers and vendors
 Architect and civil engineer’s experiences
 Material quality
 Dedication of the Apple Vale government
 Role played by Tun Therapy

8ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Reasons
The purpose or reason of the project is to give the in patients and out patients (who
generally visit the treatment center for single day) a good calming and relaxing environment. The
treatment center will facilitate the treatment process easier and effective than early days. Apple
Vale coastal town is a small town basically known for its calm and tranquil eco friendly
environment. In order to keep the environment as it is the town allows mostly wealthier and rich
older tourists only. However, due to economic downturn the older people of the town have
started facing financial pressure thus not visiting this place. In order to regain the tourists back
and accommodate them in a better way with a better facilities and quality services the Tun
Therapy has proposed to refurbish the small resort Ander Reach into “Ander Reach Treatment
Complex (ARTC).”
Business Options
From the current status of the Apple Vale town it is determined that it holds multiple
numbers of business options. The business options offers by the town include: farming, tourism.
The different local businesses available in the town are food, accommodation and tourist
entertainment. As the town has marketed itself as a peaceful area thus, it is intentionally aimed
on elderly as well as wealthy tourists only and avoids young tourists to keep the environment
beautiful. As, the other investment such as property rentals generating lower thus, elder tourists
have started facing major financial pressure. Due to this reason the n umbers of tourists were
started decreasing frequently.
For avoiding this challenge the market started focusing on wealthy families. It was
another business option to Apple Vale town. The town was offering workshop facilities along

9ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
with, wine tasting, yoga classes, natural therapies, writers’ courses and poetry reading. These
facilities helped Apple Vale to attract wealthier families and develop another tourist market.
Government of Apple Vale also believes that in order to fight against the business
downturn they may need to open market for the young tourists. The rate of alcohol consumptions
will increase drastically with this market opening.
On the other hand, Apple vale has another very important business platform that is
hospitality industry chain opening, because the tourist spot does not have any such hotel chains
instead of that it has many local breakfast offering family business, low level accommodation
resorts, green eco compounds etc. It helps to reduce the business opportunities for outsider travel
agencies, event planning agency etc.
In a parallel way Apple Vale also offers running business like gift shops, coffee shop and
bars, individual themed restaurants, small shop with usual collection. The town also has a large
shopping mall which has Woolworths Limited, Coles and other 200 shops that provides good
food products to the consumers.
The Town has Anders Reach, which is a small sized resort that is put under sale. The
resort was capable to accommodate around 100 people. Now the Ander reach has been taken by
a Perth base charitable trust called “Tun Therapies”. Though, now the TT is undertaken by a
charitable trust. After that, an action group was created named as “Turn Out”. TT has the license
to conduct beyond the regular. The tourists or visitors are also welcomes to take treatment from
the centre. The opening of a treatment centre is treated like an alliterative business idea.
The town is known for its quite and calm environment and thus, for decades the place is
in demand for the older tourists, again mainly for those people who are interested in crafts and

10ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
arts. With changing time the interest rates are also changed among the tourists and local people.
It is found that the economy of Apple Vale town is mainly supported by the farming and tourism.
Though, the area of farming is changing every day. In order to keep the environment of Apple
Vale calm and beautiful people promotes this location suitable for only older and wealthy
people.
Apple Vale has no newspaper therefore; the other business option available for the town
is opening of publishing house to serve the purpose of newspaper publishing. TT proposed to
refurbish the Ander Reach treatment center and build a new building: “Ander Reach Treatment
Complex (ARTC)”. It is expected that the charity trust would definitely meet the policy standard
and expectation of patients as well. A detail site plan is presented by the TT. The ARTC
development site is be surrounded by a play ground, Vale College and a neighbourhood farm.
Successful completion of the complex will help Apple vale to gain huge commercial profit that
may turn on the town’s economic condition as well.
The total area of land that the development is going to occupy is (158m*120m). The total
budget predicted that the total development site would need is $100,000. If all the measured
actions and activities are successfully followed throughout the complex development life cycle
then it is predicted to be completed in 7 months only.
Expected benefits
If all the above mentioned criteria are successfully followed throughout the complex
construction development period then Apple Vale would be no longer dependent on only tourism
and farming but also hospitality chain will also become a major source of income. Many
business options are available for Apple Vale. Among those many options tourism and farming

11ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
are considered as most effective and beneficial as well (Fleming & Koppelman, 2016). If the
complex is successfully developed within estimated cost of $100,000 and time of 7 months then,
it will be open for all the in patients and out patients. The building will be able to accommodate
many patients and due to quality services and facilities people will come to this place for
treatment. As it will provide effective emergency ambulance services therefore, patient’s
families will call for their services. It will give long term business success and thus the economic
backbone of Apple Vale will become stronger than the current scenario.
Expected Dis-benefits
After analyzing the current condition it is identified that, Apple Vale is facing drastic
economic downturn and therefore may not be able to give full fledged support to the construction
project. The total budget assumed for the project is quite high if the government invests this total
money for the project and the project failed to meet the expected outcomes and expectations then
it will totally breakdown the economic backbone of the town (Fleming & Koppelman, 2016). If
it successfully starts accommodating people all over Perth and other neighbourhood countries
then numbers of young tourist will start increasing which will misbalance the tranquil
environment of the town. However, based on the project elements and components it can be said
that the estimated is not unnecessary (Gulghane & Khandve, 2015).
Timescale
WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
0 Project schedule for ARTC
construction 210 days 13/04/20 29/01/21
1 pre construction stage 37 days 13/04/20 02/06/20
1.1 Analyzing current business
option of Apple Vale 5 days 13/04/20 17/04/20

12ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
1.2 Site supervision 3 days 20/04/20 22/04/20 2
1.3 Design project Scope 4 days 23/04/20 28/04/20 3
1.4 Scope documentation 2 days 23/04/20 24/04/20 3
1.5 Detail checking of Tun Therapy
proposal for ARTC 4 days 29/04/20 04/05/20 4,5
1.6 Feasibility report presentation 6 days 05/05/20 12/05/20 6
1.7 budget prediction 3 days 13/05/20 15/05/20 7
1.8 timeline prediction 4 days 18/05/20 21/05/20 8
1.9 project deliverables and
assumptions 4 days 22/05/20 27/05/20 9
1.10 Selecting major milestones 3 days 22/05/20 26/05/20 9
1.11 Developing project charter 4 days 28/05/20 02/06/20 10,11
2 Project construction phase 167 days 03/06/20 21/01/21
2.1
Anders Reach Treatment
Complex’ (ARTC) blueprint
presentation
10 days 03/06/20 16/06/20 12
2.2 Selection of construction tools
and techniques 8 days 17/06/20 26/06/20 14
2.3 Contract to suppliers 7 days 29/06/20 07/07/20 15
2.4 Hiring labours 6 days 08/07/20 15/07/20 16
2.5 Base construction completion 20 days 16/07/20 12/08/20 17
2.6 Concrete 40 days 16/07/20 09/09/20 17
2.7 Framing and tiles 20 days 13/08/20 09/09/20 18
2.8 plumbing and electricity 16 days 10/09/20 01/10/20 19,20
2.9 Painting 15 days 02/10/20 22/10/20 14,21
2.10 Design of the car parking lot area 20 days 23/10/20 19/11/20 22
2.11 Interior work 45 days 20/11/20 21/01/21
2.11.1 installing elevators 5 days 20/11/20 26/11/20 23
2.11.2 Administrative office set up 5 days 27/11/20 03/12/20 25
2.11.3 Treatment rooms set up 12 days 04/12/20 21/12/20
2.11.3.1 In- patients 7 days 04/12/20 14/12/20 26
2.11.3.2 Out patients 5 days 15/12/20 21/12/20 10,28
2.11.4 social area set up 6 days 22/12/20 29/12/20 29
2.11.5 Kitchen set up 10 days 30/12/20 12/01/21 30
2.11.6 Public restaurant set up 5 days 13/01/21 19/01/21 31
2.11.7 completing other facilities 2 days 20/01/21 21/01/21 32
3 Post construction stage 6 days 22/01/21 29/01/21
3.1 Stakeholders signoff 2 days 22/01/21 25/01/21 22,33
3.2 Final opening of the treatment
center 4 days 26/01/21 29/01/21 35
Table 1: Project Gantt chart

13ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Figure 1: Time scale for the project
(Source: created by author)

14ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Cost
The total budget estimated for the project is $100,000 and the cost distribution id
elaborated in the below table.
WBS Task Name Resource Names Cost
0 Project schedule for ARTC construction $100,000.00
1 pre construction stage $2,648.00
1.1 Analyzing current business option of Apple
Vale $0.00
1.2 Site supervision Site supervisor $144.00
1.3 Design project Scope Project manager $480.00
1.4 Scope documentation Project manager $240.00
1.5 Detail checking of Tun Therapy proposal for
ARTC $0.00
1.6 Feasibility report presentation Finance manager $384.00
1.7 budget prediction Finance manager $192.00
1.8 timeline prediction Resource manager $256.00
1.9 project deliverables and assumptions Project manager,
Resource manager $736.00
1.10 Selecting major milestones Contractor, Sub contractor $216.00
1.11 Developing project charter $0.00
2 Project construction phase $97,352.00
2.1 Anders Reach Treatment Complex’ (ARTC)
blueprint presentation Architect $560.00
2.2 Selection of construction tools and
techniques Civil engineer $512.00
2.3 Contract to suppliers Contractor, Sub contractor $504.00
2.4 Hiring labours Contractor $432.00
2.5 Base construction completion Labours $1,600.00
2.6 Concrete Concrete [1],Labours $29,744.00
2.7 Framing and tiles Framing and tiles [1] $14,000.00
2.8 plumbing and electricity plumbing and electricity
[1] $12,000.00
2.9 Painting Painting [1] $13,000.00
2.10 Design of the car parking lot area Car parking lot design
cost[1] $10,000.00
2.11 Interior work $15,000.00
2.11.1 installing elevators elevator installation
cost[1] $900.00

15ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
2.11.2 Administrative office set up admin office setup cost[1] $800.00
2.11.3 Treatment rooms set up $12,000.00
2.11.3.1 In- patients Treatment room setup
cost[1] $12,000.00
2.11.3.2 Out patients $0.00
2.11.4 social area set up cost for social area set
up[1] $300.00
2.11.5 Kitchen set up Kitchen set up cost[1] $400.00
2.11.6 Public restaurant set up Restaurant set up cost[1] $600.00
2.11.7 completing other facilities $0.00
3 Post construction stage $0.00
3.1 Stakeholders signoff $0.00
3.2 Final opening of the treatment center $0.00
Table 2: Project cost
Investment appraisal
Discount
rate (%)
4.00
%
cost of
contract
$
2,000.
00
Tools
$
15,00
0.00
Operational
cost
$
20,00
0.00
Year of
Project
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Total
expected
profit
$12,0
00.00
$
15,000.
00
$
35,000.
00
$
45,000.0
0
$
50,000.
00
$
60,000.
00
Discount rate
0.200
0 0.2500 0.3000 0.4500 0.5000 0.7000
PV
$4,00
0.00
$8,000.
00
$15,000
.00
$18,000.
00
$20,000
.00
$35,00
0.00
Profit (PV) $4,00 $ $ $ $ $ $

16ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
0.00
12,000.
00
27,000.
00
45,000.0
0
65,000.
00
100,00
0.00
100,00
0.00
Assigned
cost for the
project
$
(20,00
0.00)
Net recurring
cost $0.00
$
(15,000.
00)
$
(15,000.
00)
$
(15,000.
00)
$
(15,000.
00)
$
(15,000
.00)
Discount rate
0.250
0 0.1500 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500 0.3000
Recurring
PV cost $0.00
$
(2,250.0
0)
$
(3,750.0
0)
$
(3,750.0
0)
$
(3,750.0
0)
$
(4,500.
00)
Net value
$
(20,00
0.00)
$
(22,250.
00)
$
(26,000.
00)
$
(29,750.
00)
$
(33,500.
00)
$
(38,000
.00)
$
(38,00
0.00)
Net NPV
$
62,000
.00
ROI
1.6316
Table 3: ROI calculated for the project
Major risks
Risks are probably the most effective factor that can hamper the entire outcome of a
project. Therefore, regardless of type, nature and size of project it is essential to consider
probable risks at the project initiation phase that can be obstacle for the project development
activities (Sears, Sears, Clough, Rounds & Segner, 2015). Not only risk identification but also
respectively risk treatment plan followed by risk ranking, likelihood, priority and impact are also
needed to be developed for each identified risks. Apart from risk identification risk management
plan is also needed to be developed for the project to streamline the project development
activities accurately (Saunders, Gharaie, Chester & Leahy, 2017). For the Ander Reach

17ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Treatment Complex building design and construction project the probable risks that may create
issues are identified and elaborated in the below section. Not only this but also proper risk
management plan for each risks related to the project are also elaborated in the risk matrix table.
Risk
Id
Risk description Impact Likelihood Score Mitigation
strategies
R1 Risk with project
resources allocation: At
the ARTC complex design
initial phase if proper
human and physical
resources are not identified
and allocated to individual
project development
activities then the project
Major 4 Possible 3 High 12 appropriate resource
management
planning
R2 Over running project
budget and time: Time
and budget are the two
most important and
complimentary factor of
project development
(Kerzner, 2017). Before
initiang the project is
major 4 unlikely 2 High 8 Feasibility analysis
and feasibility report
presentation (Halpin,
Lucko, & Senior,
2017)

18ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
budget and time is not
properly assigned and
measured then this risk
occurs. Delay will lead to
additional cost
requirements as well.
R3 Lack of technical
expertise: The complex
will offer services for both
In patients and out patients.
Therefore, they need to
store the patient data in a
record keeping system.
Due to lack of technical
experts data keeping issues
may occur and also patients
financial and health related
data can be disclosed to all
the staffs (Mishakova,
Vakhrushkina, Murgul &
Sazonova, 2016). The car
parking system is a manual
one but not a smart parking
Moderate
3
Rare 1 Low 1 Hiring technical
experts after
analyzing individual
performances

19ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
system. Therefore, risks
may arise while numbers of
patients will increase and
numbers of cars
respectively according to
that.
R4 Insufficient
communication: While
developing the plan and
constructing the complex it
is essential to have proper
communication. Due to
lack of communication the
project associates may not
feel free to share their
thoughts and ideas related
to the project.
Major 4 Likely 4 Extreme
16
Use of verbal and
open communication
while sharing
information among
each other (Qazi,
Quigley, Dickson &
Kirytopoulos, 2016)
R5 Sudden price hike of
building construction
materials
Moderate
3
Almost
certain 5
Extreme
15
Considering budget
before developing
beginning for the
project (Zulch, 2016)
R6 Improper selection of
suppliers
Negligible
1
Possible 3 Low 3 Selecting best
suppliers for the

20ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
project after
developing the
project activities
R7 Lack of financial support
The economic status of
Apple Vale is not so very
high. In other words the
town is not rich like other
countries because its
economic status is
dependent on farming and
tourism only. due to this
reason the government may
not give enough economic
support to the development
activities.
Major 4 Unlikely 2 High 8 The government may
not be able to
support the projects
every time therefore,
the sponsors need to
be selected based on
investment
assumptions (Tam &
Hadikusumo, 2016).
R8 Selection of wrong
construction tools and
techniques
Minor 2 Possible 3 Moderate
6
After analyzing
project’s features
and construction
requirements the best
suited tools are to be
selected to avoid the
issues of wrong

21ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
selection of tools and
techniques
(Todorović et al.,
2015).
Figure 2: Reference Risk matrix Scoring model
(Source: Iqbal, Choudhry, Holschemacher Ali & Tamošaitienė, 2015).

22ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Transcript
<Self Introduction>
The scenario that is selected for the business case is Apple Vale’s: Ander Reach
Treatment Complex (ARTC) building construction. With the help of the presentation I would
like to bring your all kind attention on some business element and factors that are very much
essential to implement any project followed by different project prcatices. In this project I have
mentioned the project scope in details to portray why the project is so important for Apple Vale.
Not only this but in the business option section I have mentioned the different options that the
town has to retain their tourism business. The basic two source of income available for the
coastal town are tourism and Farming. However, due to some reason the businesses are getting
downturn. The treatment center that is recommended to construct will give quality facilities and
services to the in patients and out patients as well. I have developed a detail time schedule for the
project along with a cost. Not only this but also, possible ROI that the successful delivery of the
project can bring is also illustrated in the paper. Apart from that I have also elaborated the
possible risks that may hamper the project development activities along with its respective
mitigation strategies. Besides this, I have discussed the reasons for what the project is developing
along with the expected benefits and dis-benefits as well.

23ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
References
Ahmed, S. (2018). A review on using opportunities of augmented reality & virtual reality in
construction project management. Organization, technology & management in
construction: an international journal, 10(1), pp.1839-1852.
Banihashemi, S., Hosseini, M.R., Golizadeh, H. & Sankaran, S. (2017). Critical success factors
(CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in
developing countries. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), pp.1103-
1119.
Bourne, L. (2016). Stakeholder relationship management: a maturity model for organisational
implementation. Routledge.
Erdogan, S.A., Šaparauskas, J. & Turskis, Z. (2017). Decision making in construction
management: AHP & expert choice approach. Procedia engineering, 172, pp.270-276.
Fewings, P. & Henjewele, C. (2019). Construction project management: an integrated
approach. Routledge.
Fleming, Q.W. & Koppelman, J.M. (2016), December. Earned value project management.
Project Management Institute.
Gulghane, A.A. & Khandve, P.V. (2015). Management for construction materials & control of
construction waste in construction industry: a review. International Journal of
Engineering Research & Applications, 5(4), pp.59-64.
Halpin, D.W., Lucko, G. & Senior, B.A. (2017). Construction management. John Wiley & Sons.

24ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Kerzner, H. (2018). Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. John
Wiley & Sons.
Mishakova, A., Vakhrushkina, A., Murgul, V. & Sazonova, T. (2016). Project control based on a
mutual application of pert & earned value management methods. Procedia
engineering, 165, pp.1812-1817.
Qazi, A., Quigley, J., Dickson, A. & Kirytopoulos, K. (2016). Project Complexity & Risk
Management (ProCRiM): Towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in
construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), pp.1183-
1198.
Sears, S.K., Sears, G.A., Clough, R.H., Rounds, J.L. & Segner, R.O. (2015). Construction
project management. John Wiley & Sons.
Tam, N.T. & Hadikusumo, B.H. (2016). Modelling of trust & working relationship in
construction project management: a case study of Vietnam. International Journal of
Project Organisation & Management, 8(4), pp.366-395.
Todorović, M.L., Petrović, D.Č., Mihić, M.M., Obradović, V.L. & Bushuyev, S.D. (2015).
Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project
management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), pp.772-783.
Zulch, B. (2016). A proposed model for construction project management communication in the
South African construction industry. Acta Structilia, 23(1), pp.1-35.

25ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Bibliography
Ferrada, X., Núñez, D., Neyem, A., Serpell, A. & Sepúlveda, M. (2016). A lessons-learned
system for construction project management: a preliminary application. Procedia-Social
& Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp.302-309.
Gunduz, M. & Yahya, A.M.A. (2018). Analysis of project success factors in construction
industry. Technological & Economic Development of Economy, 24(1), pp.67-80.
Heravi, A., Coffey, V. & Trigunarsyah, B. (2015). Evaluating the level of stakeholder
involvement during the project planning processes of building projects. International
Journal of Project Management, 33(5), pp.985-997.
Hughes, W., Champion, R. & Murdoch, J. (2015). Construction contracts: law & management.
Routledge.
Iqbal, S., Choudhry, R.M., Holschemacher, K., Ali, A. & Tamošaitienė, J. (2015). Risk
management in construction projects. Technological & Economic Development of
Economy, 21(1), pp.65-78.
Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, &
controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

26ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX
Larsen, J.K., Shen, G.Q., Lindhard, S.M. & Brunoe, T.D (2015). Factors affecting schedule
delay, cost overrun, & quality level in public construction projects. Journal of
Management in Engineering, 32(1), p.04015032.
Luo, L., He, Q., Jaselskis, E.J. & Xie, J. (2017). Construction project complexity: research trends
& implications. Journal of construction engineering & management, 143(7), p.04017019.
Mallawaarachchi, H. & Senaratne, S. (2015), December. Importance of quality for construction
project success. In 6th International conference on structural engineering & construction
management.
Mok, K.Y., Shen, G.Q. & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega
construction projects: A review & future directions. International Journal of Project
Management, 33(2), pp.446-457.
Ogunde, A., Olaolu, O., Afolabi, A.O., Owolabi, J. & Ojelabi, R.A. (2017). Challenges
confronting construction project management system for sustainable construction in
developing countries: Professionals perspectives (a case study of Nigeria). Journal of
Building Performance, 8(1), pp.1-11.
Saunders, P., Gharaie, E., Chester, A. & Leahy, C. (2017). Improving the student experience
with learning analytics in construction project management courses. EPiC Series in
Education Science, 1, pp.505-515.
Wu, X., Zhao, W., Ma, T. & Yang, Z. (2019). Improving the Efficiency of Highway
Construction Project Management Using Lean Management. Sustainability, 11(13),
p.3646.

27ANDER REACH TREATMENT COMPLEX