Article Review: Youth Victimization: Prevalence and Implications Study

This report is an article review of a 2003 study by Kilpatrick, Saunders, and Smith, focusing on youth victimization in the United States. The article examines the prevalence and implications of various forms of violence, including sexual assault, physical punishment, and witnessing assault, on children and youth. The research explores the link between victimization and outcomes such as delinquent behaviors, substance use, and mental health issues. The study highlights high victimization rates among Hispanic and Asian populations and identifies perpetrators as people known to the victims. While acknowledging limitations in sample size, the report underscores the importance of the findings for policymakers, criminal justice departments, and researchers. The authors, with strong backgrounds in relevant fields, provide credible information, and the report’s clear definitions and use of tables and graphs enhance understanding. The study's methodology, including the use of interviews, effectively addresses the research questions and offers valuable insights into youth victimization.

Running head: ARTICLE REVIEW 1
Article Review
Name
Institution

ARTICLE REVIEW 2
Article Review
Youth Victimization: Prevalence and Implications
The article is a creation of Kilpatrick, Saunders, and Smith completed in 2003 which
talks on the youth victimization issues surrounding the prevalence, implications, and research in
brief. The report promotes knowledge on the types and amount of victimization subjected on
children and youth as well as their effects on their daily lives. Therein, it conducts a survey on
the prevalence of sexual assault, physical punishment, physical assault, and that subjected to
whenever witnessing an assault (Ybarra, Espelage, Langhinrichsen-Rohling & Korchmaros,
2016). The aspects guided the observation or contribution of the assault cases towards growth of
delinquent behaviors, substance use, and mental problems.
The research found extreme cases of interpersonal violence and victimization in the
United States. Furthermore, the outcome documents a high prevalence of the case among the
Hispanics and Asians characterizing each type of assault. The study found that the perpetrators
were people closely known or related to the victims and thus spoke a lot towards the intervention
plans. Moreover, the study documents the limitation of the study touching on the sample size that
failed to offer a clear reflection of the case nationally (Kilpatrick, Saunders & Smith, 2003). The
sample excluded youths from homes with no phones, the homeless, and those in correctional
facilities. As a result, it may affect the assumption and fact findings on the wholesome treatment
of the victimization issue.
The report was essential and instructive given the segments of people it touches and that
can turn the information into useful knowledge. The information remains essential for the policy
makers in trying to address the challenge and coming up with measures to reduce the prevalence
of the same (Kilpatrick, Saunders & Smith, 2003). On the other hand, the information is critical

ARTICLE REVIEW 3
to the criminal justice department in understanding and unraveling the mystery behind challenges
that land children to the justice system (Hinduja & Patchin, 2017). Lastly, the research
information is important to the researchers in varied fields as they try to find the reasons
underlying practices in the society.
The information provided by the authors remains authentic given the background of the
authors and their contribution to the respective field. Kilpatrick doubles up as a professor and
director of the National Crime Victims Research as well as the director of national violence
against women prevention research center. Benjamin Saunders is a PHD holder and directs child
program and the National Crime Victims Research (Kilpatrick, Saunders & Smith, 2003). The
last author Smith serves as an associate professor and head of training at National Violence
against Women Prevention Research Center. As such, the information provided coming from a
reputable source can be trusted and counted for future research work (Lewis, 2015).
The report takes a proper approach as it defines the terminologies in trying to foster
understanding among the audience. Defining of terminologies assist in simplifying reading thus
manages to create an attractive piece of information. Furthermore, it provides information on the
tables and graphs that expound and give a trend analysis of the assault occurrence on victims
(Kilpatrick, Saunders & Smith, 2003). At the same time, the choice of interviewing as a method
of study remains essential in outlining information as it reaches a variety of people and gets
direct information that remains verifiable and justifiable as information is collected first hand.
Generally, the research remains instrumental and answers the research questions satisfactorily.

ARTICLE REVIEW 4
References
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2017). Cultivating youth resilience to prevent bullying and
cyberbullying victimization. Child abuse & neglect, 73, 51-62.
Kilpatrick, D. G., Saunders, B. E., & Smith, D. W. (2003). Youth victimization: Prevalence and
implications. Research in brief. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice
Programs.
Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.
Health promotion practice, 16(4), 473-475.
Ybarra, M. L., Espelage, D. L., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Korchmaros, J. D. (2016).
Lifetime prevalence rates and overlap of physical, psychological, and sexual dating abuse
perpetration and victimization in a national sample of youth. Archives of sexual behavior,
45(5), 1083-1099.