ASRS Legal Case Study: Parties, Issues, and Legal Recourse Analysis

This case study examines the ASRS legal case, focusing on the legal issues arising from a failed automated warehouse project. The analysis covers the liability of the managing director and general manager for misrepresenting their qualifications, the actions of external contractors who disclosed confidential information, and the legal recourse available to Super Cola Taiwan (STC). Key issues include contract breaches, negligence in project management, and the impact of liquidation on stakeholders. The document explores potential legal actions STC can take against the company's administrators and directors, as well as the implications of the project's failure on the parties involved. The case highlights the importance of ethical conduct, competent management, and adherence to contractual obligations in preventing such outcomes. The document references legal precedents and scholarly articles to support the analysis and proposed solutions.

ASRS LEGAL CASE
June 24
2015

Table of Contents
SOLUTION 1.................................................................................................................................................3
SOLUTION 2:-...............................................................................................................................................3
SOLUTION 3:-...............................................................................................................................................4
SOLUTION 4:-...............................................................................................................................................4
References...................................................................................................................................................6

SOLUTION 1.
The various parties that are involved in the contract might adapt the legal directions like the DB
believes that the market could be mainly developed in Asia, which mainly provides high rising
automated warehouse solutions at more reasonable rates which are demanded by the good
suppliers by using the variations in normally used ASRS configuration.1 The parties involved in
the contract can take legal action against the managing director and the general manager of the
company as they shows their experiences and qualifications false and appoint the individuals for
the completion of the work with no qualification which results to liquidation of the company.
They can recover their loss from the owners of the company.
SOLUTION 2:-
The motivations of the two external contractors, which were described by the full-time employees of
the company were questioned. These two contractors were approached by the client, and they
provided the inside information about the project to the clients for which they received a handsome
amount which contribute to terminate the contract with DB. The two contractors were liable for the
winding up of the company and in the legal sense they were liable for disclosing the personal
information of the company to the client and action can be taken accordingly and in the ethical sense
1 BURNS, BEVERLY, ARCO Alaska Inc., A, 'Development Implications And Systems Tract Architecture Of Zones 2B
And 2C, Ivishak Sandstone, North Slope, Alaska' (2000) 84 Bulletin.

the license of both the contractors should be cancelled because the contract which are terminated
impacted on DB’s cash flow and credibility and stakeholder confidence.2
SOLUTION 3:-
The legal issues contained in this case study are-
 Whether the lack of the management of the company amounts to the failure of the project.
 Whether incompetence in the project management results in the winding up of the company
just after the one year of being honored with the prestigious awards.
 Whether the information disclosed by the two external contractors led to the loss of the DB's
cash flow and credibility.
 Whether Super cola Taiwan, (STC) can take action against the Dag- Bracken for the failure
of the project.
SOLUTION 4:-
With the effect of this liquidation, the STC was unable to perform any place near the required
optional speed. SCT had taken the steps to avoid the project failure, i.e. the Super cola Taiwan (STC)
would replace the whole system with the more consistent ASRS model.3 No doubt many ASRS
2Alexia Bertrand and Arnaud Coibion, 'Shareholder Suits Against The Directors Of A Company, Against Other
Shareholders And Against The Company Itself Under Belgian Law' (2009) 6 European Company and Financial Law
Review.
3 Ian Duncan Wallace and Werner Lorenz, International Encyclopaedia Of Comparative Law. Vol VIII: Specific
Contracts. Ch. 8. Contracts For Work On Goods And Building Contracts' (1984) 32 The American Journal of
Comparative Law.

models had successfully completed since the time, but no one has ever used the same technology
which was attempted by DB.The systems were gotten unreliable both as manually or electrically. The
administrators of the state will only award a few cents to the creditors of the DB.4 As the DB
awarded with the export award, within a week, the administrator announces that for the
administrative reasons the award was placed in the hands of the administrator. So the STC can take
legal action against the administrator also to avoid the project failure. STC can also initiate legal
proceedings against the managing director and the general manager of the DB as they pretend the
wrong qualification and experiences.
4 Corporations. Rights Of Stockholders. Payments To Preferred Stockholders In Liquidation Under Public Utility
Holding Company Act Not Limited To Amount Of Liquidation Preference (1946) 59 Harvard Law Review.

References
Bertrand, Alexia and Arnaud Coibion, 'Shareholder Suits Against The Directors Of A Company,
Against Other Shareholders And Against The Company Itself Under Belgian Law' (2009) 6
European Company and Financial Law Review
BURNS, BEVERLY, ARCO Alaska Inc., A, 'Development Implications And Systems Tract
Architecture Of Zones 2B And 2C, Ivishak Sandstone, North Slope, Alaska' (2000) 84 Bulletin
'Corporations. Rights Of Stockholders. Payments To Preferred Stockholders In Liquidation
Under Public Utility Holding Company Act Not Limited To Amount Of Liquidation Preference
(1946) 59 Harvard Law Review
Mews, J. And R. Jones, 'Continuances, Mergers And Winding Up Procedures Under The Newly
Enacted Jersey Foundation Law' (2010) 16 Trusts & Trustees
Wallace, Ian Duncan and Werner Lorenz, International Encyclopedia Of Comparative Law. Vol
VIII: Specific Contracts. Ch. 8. Contracts For Work On Goods And Building Contracts' (1984)
32 The American Journal of Comparative Law
'Winding Up' (2009) 459 jobs