Analysis of Assessment Methods: Peer, Self, Collaborative, & Teachers

This report delves into the critical aspects of assessment methods, focusing on peer and self-assessment, collaborative activities, and teacher observations. The strategies of assessment may promote teachers to gather usable and consistent substantiation of learner’s culture; consider equilibrium a...Read More

PEER AND SELF-ASSESSMENT, COLLABORATIVE
ACTIVITIES AND TEACHERS’ OBSERVATIONS
The strategies of assessment may promote teachers to Plan on behalf of gathering usable and
consistent substantiation of learner’s culture; consider equilibrium among informal as well as
formal indication (Clay, 2010). A variety of formal besides informal approaches can afford
prospects for pupils to prove the magnitude of their awareness, understanding as well as
talents, their wisdom by means of a collection of resources in addition to motivation based on
materials, comprising ICT. The strategies encompass observations, concerted events and
actions of an insightful landscape.
TEACHER’s OBSERVATIONS
Teacher observations can be responsible for facts about schoolchildren’s accomplishment in
terms of effects. Substantiation of facts may be accumulated and chronicled officially and
unceremoniously, where: informal surveillance and response occur all through the teaching as
well as learning events (Dubicki, 2013). The formal reflection involves preparation for an
occasion to perceive specific educational consequences. Assessment of actions might embrace:
listening, inspecting and responsive assignments (e.g. replies to scripts comprising digital stories,
pictures and television programs, podcasts, biopics as well as consultations), teacher/student
deliberations or seminars. The learner’s involvement in concrete events and demonstrations
reflection of students as they join in and involve throughout learning actions, for instance,
listening to students’ use of philological features and presentation of talents to new settings and
the incorporation of ICT, planned examination to govern distinct statuses of understanding,
pupil’s handling of materials to validate theoretical knowledge of key ideas (McCabe, 2012).
When educator’s observation is utilized for resolutions of assessment, confirmation can be
assembled about pupils’ aptitude to: clarify ‘how or else why’, establish their appreciative views
of significant concepts and proper language for deliberating their learning involvements and
relating their knowledge to new environments and state of affairs as well as interconnect
successfully (Merisuo-Storm & Soininen, 2014).
PEER ASSESSMENT
1 | P a g e

Educators should idealize suitable linguistic traits and clarify expectations for events that
integrate peer feedback. Response may be verbal, written or else digital, and might deliver an
opening for schoolchildren to mature their social, concerted and rational abilities. Students might
provide opinion to their peers around:
 whatever gets concluded
 talent and what characteristics have been accomplished in decent state
 recommendations to progress their work with orientation to the knowledge and target of
assessment
 Additional approaches to fulfil the accomplishment (Schlesinger & McMurray, 2012).
Teaching pioneering generation to magnificently locate in the economical system and in power
of purpose as “national capital” more principally indicates to an enthusiastic attribute fairly
round the domain of education (7–10 assessment strategies | NSW Education Standards, 2019).
The learners persevere with adeptness to settle their precise improvement and teaching come to
be reinforced with the self-motivated theoretical harmonization implemented over learning
appraisal on the training area.
SELF-ASSESSMENT AND SELF-EVALUATION
Student’s self-assessment procedure might benefit to classify whatever they are familiar with,
where they want to stand and by what method to acquire the objectives of learning. Collecting
information around the approach of students’ way of thinking and revelation on their knowledge
can give valuable information to the educators to update future training and knowledge practices.
Reinforcement of the abilities of self-evaluation might improve the methods of students’
interpretation of responses (Merisuo-Storm & Soininen, 2014).
Self-evaluation inspires the growth of metacognitive technique of thinking as apprentices
redirect on them as learners as well as recognize their learning flair and in what manner they
could learn the best of their abilities. It correspondingly reassures pupils to fix learning
objectives with reference to their curriculum, ascertain what they need to learnt and whatever
they have achieved, and perform as per feedback provided by the teachers (Clay, 2010).
Portfolios, illustrations of varied sort of activities and newsletters, counting online journals,
might provide help to undertake the reflective development where pupils can establish
2 | P a g e

appropriate goals, reveal on their performance and observe their learning potentials (Seely Flint,
Kitson & Lowe, 2014).
COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES
Collaborative activities transpire on account of interface among students involved in the
accomplishment of a collective task. They team up, “face-to-face inside or outside the
schoolroom”. They might practice ICT to empower group conversation or complete cooperative
assignments within their institute, in the middle of schools, in the vicinity, countrywide and
universally.
Assessment activities may include:
 Evaluating and stimulating opinions over group discussions
 Cooperative group effort, team projects and surveys, counting the distribution of definite
roles and accountabilities
 Group-prepared demonstrations on a variety of themes for a diversity of determinations
and listeners
 Group critiques/squad experiments, comprising the usage of technology in the direction
of supporting groundwork, facility and learner’s responsibility (eg wiki, blogs)
 Mixed-ability besides distinguished group events as suitable
 Paired assignments (think–duos–share, free-associating, electronic message allotment and
meetings)
 Learner’s question/answer arrangements, creating their individual matter in Schemes of
Learning Management
 Productive comment to the partners according to the standards of effort (7–10 assessment
strategies | NSW Education Standards, 2019).
3 | P a g e

References
7–10 assessment strategies | NSW Education Standards. (2019). Retrieved from
https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/understanding-the-
curriculum/assessment/7-10-assessment-strategies
Clay, M. (2010). How very young children explore writing. Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson
Dubicki, E. (2013). Faculty perceptions of students' information literacy skills
competencies. Journal Of Information Literacy, 7(2). doi: 10.11645/7.2.1852
McCabe, R. (2012). An academic literacy course: Making choices. J. Lang. Teach., 45(2).
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v45i2.3
Merisuo-Storm, T., & Soininen, M. (2014). The Interdependence between Young Students’
Reading Attitudes, Reading Skills, and Self-Esteem. Journal of Educational and Social
Research. doi:10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n2p122
Schlesinger, M., & McMurray, B. (2012). The past, present, and future of computational models
of cognitive development. Cognitive Development, 27(4), 326-348. doi:
10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.07.002
Seely Flint, A., Kitson, L. & Lowe, K. (2014). Literacy in Australia. Pedagogies for
engagement. Old. Wiley.
4 | P a g e